Abstract
Background
The overlapping nature of thyroid lesions visualized on ultrasound (US) images could result in misdiagnosis and missed diagnoses in clinical practice.
Purpose
To compare the diagnostic effectiveness of US coupled with three mathematical models, namely logistic regression (Logistics), partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and support vector machine (SVM), in discriminating between malignant and benign thyroid nodules.
Material and Methods
A total of 588 thyroid nodules (287 benign and 301 malignant) were collected, among which 80% were utilized for constructing the mathematical models and the remaining 20% were used for internal validation. In addition, an external validation cohort comprising 160 nodules (80 benign and 80 malignant) was employed to validate the accuracy of these mathematical models.
Results
Our study demonstrated that all three models exhibited effective predictive capabilities for distinguishing between benign and malignant nodules, whose diagnostic effectiveness surpassed that of the TI-RADS classification, particularly in terms of true negative diagnoses. SVM achieved a higher diagnostic rate for malignant thyroid nodules (93.8%) compared to Logistics (91.5%) and PLS-DA (91.6%). PLS-DA exhibited higher diagnostic rates for benign thyroid nodules (91.9%) compared to Logistics (86.7%) and SVM (88.7%). Both the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of PLS-DA (0.917) and SVM (0.913) were higher than that of Logistics (0.891).
Conclusion
Our findings indicate that SVM had significantly higher rates of true positive diagnoses and PLS-DA exhibited significantly higher rates of true negative diagnoses. All three models outperformed the TI-RADS classification in discriminating between malignant and benign thyroid nodules.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
