Varicocele represents the most common correctable cause of male infertility. The presence of non-invasive imaging parameters providing evidence as to which patients with varicocele are at risk for infertility would be important.
Purpose
To explore the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using semi-quantitative parameters in the assessment of testicular perfusion in infertile men with clinical varicocele.
Material and Methods
The study cohort included 11 infertile men with clinical varicocele and six controls, with prior paternity. Subtraction DCE-MRI was performed after gadolinium administration, using a three-dimensional fast field-echo sequence. Time-signal intensity curves were created and semi-quantitative parameters were calculated. The independent samples t-test was used to compare basic T1 perfusion parameters between infertile testes with clinical varicocele and normal testes. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the most significant predictor of the diagnosis of clinical varicocele.
Results
Both testes with clinical varicocele and normal testes enhanced moderately and homogeneously, with a linear increase of enhancement throughout the examination. Higher mean values of maximum enhancement (P = 0.026), maximum relative enhancement (P = 0.024), and wash-in rate (P = 0.013) were detected in the testes of infertile men with clinical varicocele, compared to the normal population. The wash-in rate proved the most significant predictor of the diagnosis of clinical varicocele (P = 0.013).
Conclusion
DCE-MRI may provide a valuable insight into the testicular perfusion of infertile men with clinical varicocele. The wash-in rate proved a strong and independent predictor of the diagnosis of clinical varicocele.
FreemanSBertolottoMRichenbergJ, et al.Ultrasound evaluation of varicoceles: guidelines and recommendations of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group (ESUR-SPIWG) for detection, classification and grading. Eur Radiol2020;30:11–25.
2.
BertolottoMFreemanSRichenbergJ, et al.Ultrasound evaluation of varicoceles: systematic literature review and rationale of the ESUR-SPIWG Guidelines and Recommendations. J Ultrasound2020;23:487–507.
3.
Tsili AC, Xiropotamou ON, Sylakos A, et al. Potential role of imaging in assessing harmful effects on spermatogenesis in adult testes with varicocele. World J Radiol 2017;28:34–45.
4.
SofikitisΝStavrouSSkourosS, et al.Mysteries, facts, and fiction in varicocele pathophysiology and treatment. Eur Urol Suppl2014;13:89–99.
5.
ShahRAgarwalAKavoussiP, et al.Consensus and diversity in the management of varicocele for male infertility: results of a global practice survey and comparison with guidelines and recommendations. World J Mens Health2022. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.220048.
6.
ValentinoMBertolottoMDerchiL, et al.Children and adults varicocele: diagnostic issues and therapeutical strategies. J Ultrasound2014;17:185–193.
7.
ShiraishiKMatsuyamaHTakiharaH. Pathophysiology of varicocele in male infertility in the era of assisted reproductive technology. Int J Urol2012;19:538–550.
8.
TiseoBCEstevesSCCocuzzaMS. Summary evidence on the effects of varicocele treatment to improve natural fertility in subfertile men. Asian J Androl2016;18:239–245.
9.
MarteA. The history of varicocele: from antiquity to the modern ERA. Int Braz J Urol2018;44:563–576.
10.
MinhasSBettocchiCBoeriL, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on male sexual and reproductive health: 2021 update on male infertility. Eur Urol2021;80:603–620.
11.
UnsalATurgutATTaşkinF, et al.Resistance and pulsatility index increase in capsular branches of testicular artery: indicator of impaired testicular microcirculation in varicocele?J Clin Ultrasound2007;35:191–195.
12.
SemizITokgözOTokgozH, et al.The investigation of correlation between semen analysis parameters and intraparenchymal testicular spectral Doppler indices in patients with clinical varicocele. Ultrasound Q2014;30:33–40.
13.
AkcarNTurgutMAdapinarB, et al.Intratesticular arterial resistance and testicular volume in infertile men with subclinical varicocele. J Clin Ultrasound2004;32:389–393.
14.
Ur RehmanKQureshiABNumanA, et al.Pressure flow pattern of varicocele veins and its correlation with testicular blood flow and semen parameters. Andrologia2018;50:e12856.
15.
DaliliARHamidi MadaniASaeid SadeghiJ.The comparison of resistance Index of testicular artery using color Doppler ultrasound in infertile men undergoing varicocelectomy. J Reprod Infertil2021;22:110–115.
16.
TarhanSUcerOSahinMO, et al.Long-term effect of microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy on testicular blood flow. J Androl2011;32:33–39.
17.
RocherLGennissonJLBarangerJ, et al.Ultrasensitive Doppler as a tool for the diagnosis of testicular ischemia during the Valsalva maneuver: a new way to explore varicoceles?Acta Radiol2019;60:1048–1056.
18.
CarettaNPalegoPSchipillitiM, et al.Testicular contrast harmonic imaging to evaluate intratesticular perfusion alterations in patients with varicocele. J Urol2010;183:263–269.
19.
FuschiACaponeLAbuorouqS, et al.Shear wave elastography in varicocele patients: prospective study to investigate correlation with semen parameters and histological findings. Int J Clin Pract2021;75:e13699.
20.
RocherLCritonAGennissonJL, et al.Testicular shear wave elastography in normal and infertile men: a prospective study on 601 patients. Ultrasound Med Biol2017;43:782–789.
21.
Emad-EldinSSalimAMAWahbaMH, et al.The use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the functional assessment of the testes of patients with clinical varicocele. Andrologia2019;51:e13197.
22.
KarakasEKarakasOCulluN, et al.Diffusion-weighted MRI of the testes in patients with varicocele: a preliminary study. AJR Am J Roentegenol2014;202:324–328.
23.
ÇekiçBKiliçKKToslakIE, et al.Correlation between semen analysis parameters and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the testicles in patients with varicocele: a pilot study. J Comput Assist Tomogr2018;42:423–428.
24.
YıldırımIOSağlıkSÇelikH. Conventional and ZOOMit DWI for evaluation of testis in patients with ipsilateral varicocele. AJR Am J Roentgenol2017;208:1045–1050.
25.
TsiliACSofikitisNXiropotamouO, et al.Diffusion tensor imaging as an adjunct tool for the diagnosis of varicocele. Andrologia2019;51:e13210.
26.
XiropotamouOTsiliACAstrakasL, et al.A preliminary study of the biochemical environment of infertile testes with clinical varicocele. Eur J Radiol2020;127:108989.
27.
EssigMShiroishiMSNguyenTB, et al.Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked technical questions. AJR Am J Roentgenol2013;200:24–34.
28.
JahngGHLiKLOstergaardL, et al.Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a comprehensive update on principles and techniques. Korean J Radiol2014;15:554–577.
29.
Tsili AC, Bertolotto M, Turgut AT, et al. MRI of the scrotum: recommendations of the ESUR Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group. Eur Radiol 2018;28:31–43.
30.
Tsili AC, Argyropoulou MI, Dolciami M, et al. When to ask for an MRI of the scrotum. Andrology 2021;9:1395–1409.
31.
WatanabeYDohkeMOhkuboK, et al.Scrotal disorders: evaluation of testicular enhancement patterns at dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging. Radiology2000;217:219–227.
32.
Tsili AC, Argyropoulou MI, Astrakas LG, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced substraction MRI for characterizing intratesticular mass lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:578–585.
33.
El SanharawiICorreasJMGlasL, et al.Non-palpable incidentally found testicular tumors: differentiation between benign, malignant, and burned-out tumors using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur J Radiol2016;85:2072–2082.
34.
KhannaMAbualruzARYadavSK, et al.Diagnostic performance of multi-parametric MRI to differentiate benign sex cord stromal tumors from malignant (non-stromal and stromal) testicular neoplasms. Abdom Radiol (NY)2021;46:319–330.
35.
ManganaroLSaldariMPozzaC, et al.Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the characterisation of small, non-palpable solid testicular tumours. Eur Radiol2018;28:554–564.
36.
WatanabeYNagayamaMOkumuraA, et al.MR imaging of testicular torsion: features of testicular hemorrhagic necrosis and clinical outcomes. J Magn Reson Imaging2007;26:100–108.
37.
ChoykePL. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the scrotum: reality check. Radiology2000;217:14–15.
38.
HurtGSHowardsSSTurnerTT. Repair of experimental varicoceles in the rat. Long-term effects on testicular blood flow and temperature and cauda epididymidal sperm concentration and motility. J Androl1986;7:271–276.
39.
HurtGSHowardsSSTurnerTT. The effects of unilateral, experimental varicocele are not mediated through the ipsilateral testis. J Androl1987;8:403–408.
40.
TurnerTT. The study of varicocele through the use of animal models. Hum Reprod Update2001;7:78–84.
41.
SweeneyTERozumJSGoreRW. Alteration of testicular microvascular pressures during venous pressure elevation. Am J Physiol1995;269:H37–H45.
42.
KilincFKayaselcukFAygunC, et al.Experimental varicocele induces hypoxia in ducible factor-1a, vascular endothelial growth factor expression and angiogenesis in the rat testis. J Urol2004;172:1188–1191.
43.
HaHKParkHJParkNC. Expression of E-cadherin anda-catenin in a varicocele-induced infertility rat model. Asian J Androl2011;13:470–475.
