Abstract
Background
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the reference standard for the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) and subsequent diagnosis of osteoporosis. Since various computed tomography (CT) protocols are scanned for various indications, we can incidentally measure BMD using CT. Previous studies have revealed a correlation between BMD and Hounsfield unit (HU) values obtained with different CT protocols.
Purpose
To compare the diagnostic value of CT protocols (lumbar spine CT [LSCT], abdomen-pelvis contrast-enhanced CT [APCT], and low-dose chest CT [LDCT]) for osteoporosis.
Material and Methods
We retrospectively included 17 patients (6 men, 11 women; mean age=68 years) who had undergone all four imaging studies within six months, during 2011–2021. HU values were manually measured at the center of the L1 vertebra by a radiology resident. Pearson correlation test was performed between HU values and BMD of L1 vertebra. The diagnostic performance of each CT protocol was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Intra-individual concordance of the four tests to diagnose osteoporosis was analyzed by tabulating.
Results
The mean HU values were 104.4 ± 47.2 HU with LSCT, 149.0 ± 56.9 HU with APCT, and 114.3 ± 60.0 HU with LDCT. HU values from each protocol were positively correlated (r = 0.676-0.735; P < 0.005) with BMD. LDCT had the highest diagnostic performance (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.701) and APCT the lowest (AUC = 0.569). APCT was discordant with the other protocols for diagnosing osteoporosis.
Conclusion
LDCT had the highest diagnostic performance for osteoporosis with predetermined cutoff value. APCT requires the increase of cutoff value for osteoporosis diagnosis.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
