Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Risk stratification of asymptomatic carotid plaque remains an issue in stroke prevention in clinical practice.

Purpose

To investigate whether a multimodal ultrasound (MMU) model would help plaque risk stratification in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Material and Methods

A prospective study was conducted of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with > 50% proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. All patients underwent MMU examination. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify parameters associated with ischemic vascular events (IVE). These parameters were used to develop a scoring nomogram to assess the probability of IVE. We elaborated the diagnostic performance of the MMU nomogram using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

From December 2018 to December 2019, 98 patients (75 men, mean age 67 ± 8 years) were included; 50 were symptomatic and 48 were asymptomatic. Multivariable regression analyses revealed that plaque surface morphology (PSM) (odds ratio [OR] 2.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26–7.12, P = 0.013), intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) grades (OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.77–5.89, P<0.001), and carotid stenosis degree (CSD) (OR 4.12, 95% CI 1.47–11.55, P = 0.007) were independently associated with IVE. For the nomogram, the area under the ROC curve was 0.85 (95% CI 0.77–0.92) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test P value was 0.822.

Conclusions

In patients with proximal ICA > 50%, PSM, IPN grades, and CSD were independent variables associated with IVE. The MMU nomogram provided favorable value to risk stratification of IVE. Future large-scale studies with long-term follow-up are needed to validate these findings.

Keywords

Carotid plaque risk stratification multimodal ultrasound superb microvascular imaging nomogram

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Johnson

Nguyen

Roth

, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18:439–458.

Zhou

Wang

Zeng

, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet 2019; 394:1145–1158.

Grotta

JC.

Clinical practice. Carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:1143–1150.

Barnett

Taylor

Eliasziw

, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1415–1425.

Naghavi

Libby

Falk

, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation 2003; 108:1664–1672.

Shah

Chahal

Kooner

, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography vs B-mode ultrasound for visualization of intima-media thickness and detection of plaques in human carotid arteries. Echocardiography 2017; 34:723–730.

Saha

Gourineni

Feinstein

SB.

The use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for imaging of carotid atherosclerotic plaques: current evidence, future directions. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2016; 26:81–96.

Aboyans

Ricco

Bartelink

MEL

, et al. 2017 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial diseases, in collaboration with the European society for vascular surgery (ESVS): document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries. Eur Heart J 2018; 39:763–816.

Walker

Marler

Goldstein

, et al. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive committee for the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study. JAMA 1995; 273:1421–1428.

10.

Golledge

Greenhalgh

Davies

AH.

The symptomatic carotid plaque. Stroke 2000; 31:774–781.

11.

Saba

Saam

Jäger

, et al. Imaging biomarkers of vulnerable carotid plaques for stroke risk prediction and their potential clinical implications. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18:559–572.

12.

Chang

Feng

Ruan

, et al. Positive correlation between neovascularization degree of carotid atherosclerosis determined by contrast-enhanced ultrasound and level of serum C-reactive protein. Vasa 2015; 44:187–194.

13.

Farooq

van Klaveren

Steyerberg

, et al. Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II. Lancet 2013; 381:639–650.

14.

Meschia

Brott

Chukwudelunzu

, et al. Verifying the stroke-free phenotype by structured telephone interview. Stroke 2000; 31:1076–1080.

15.

Brott

Howard

Roubin

, et al. Long-term results of stenting versus endarterectomy for carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:1021–1031.

16.

Grant

Benson

Moneta

, et al . Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis-society of radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference. Ultrasound Q 2003; 19:190–198.

17.

Touboul

Hennerici

Meairs

, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004-2006-2011). An update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th watching the risk symposia, at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, and Hamburg, Germany, 2011. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012; 34:290–296.

18.

Elhfnawy

Heuschmann

Pham

, et al. Stenosis length and degree interact with the risk of cerebrovascular events related to internal carotid artery stenosis. Front Neurol 2019; 10:317.

19.

Stein

Korcarz

Hurst

, et al. Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement from the American society of echocardiography carotid intima-media thickness task force. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21:93–190.

20.

Nicolaides

Kakkos

Kyriacou

, et al. Asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis and cerebrovascular risk stratification. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52:1486–1496.

21.

Elkind

Cheng

Boden-Albala

, et al. Elevated white blood cell count and carotid plaque thickness: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke 2001; 32:842–849.

22.

Arnold

Modaresi

Thomas

, et al. Carotid plaque characterization by duplex scanning: observer error may undermine current clinical trials. Stroke 1999; 30:61–65.

23.

De Bray

Baud

Dauzat

Consensus Concerning the Morphology and the Risk of Carotid Plaques. Cerebrovascular Diseases 1997; 7:289–296.

24.

Zamani

Skagen

Scott

, et al. Carotid plaque neovascularization detected with superb microvascular imaging ultrasound without using contrast media. Stroke 2019; 50:3121–3127.

25.

Kerr

Brown

Zhu

, et al. Assessing the clinical impact of risk prediction models with decision curves: guidance for correct interpretation and appropriate use. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:2534–2540.

26.

Prabhakaran

Rundek

Ramas

, et al. Carotid plaque surface irregularity predicts ischemic stroke: the northern manhattan study. Stroke 2006; 37:2696–2701.

27.

Lovett

Gallagher

Hands

, et al. Histological correlates of carotid plaque surface morphology on lumen contrast imaging. Circulation 2004; 110:2190–2197.

28.

Kuk

Wannarong

Beletsky

, et al. Volume of carotid artery ulceration as a predictor of cardiovascular events. Stroke 2014; 45:1437–1441.

29.

Cicha

Wörner

Urschel

, et al. Carotid plaque vulnerability: a positive feedback between hemodynamic and biochemical mechanisms. Stroke 2011; 42:3502–3510.

30.

Horie

Morofuji

Morikawa

, et al. Communication of inwardly projecting neovessels with the lumen contributes to symptomatic intraplaque hemorrhage in carotid artery stenosis. J Neurosurg 2015; 123:1125–1132.

31.

Sidhu

Cantisani

Dietrich

, et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Short Version). Ultraschall Med 2018; 39:154–180.

32.

Di Leo

Venturini

de Soccio

, et al. Multiparametric ultrasound evaluation with CEUS and shear wave elastography for carotid plaque risk stratification. J Ultrasound 2018; 21:293–300.

33.

Oura

Kato

Ohba

, et al. Evaluation of intraplaque neovascularization using superb microvascular imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2018; 27:2348–2353.

34.

Cappellari

Turcato

Forlivesi

, et al. STARTING-SICH nomogram to predict symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis for stroke. Stroke 2018; 49:397–404.

35.

Akutsu

Hosoda

Fujita

, et al. A preliminary prediction model with MR plaque imaging to estimate risk for new ischemic brain lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging after endarterectomy or stenting in patients with carotid stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33:1557–1564.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.27 MB

Multimodal ultrasound parameters aided carotid plaque risk stratification in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis