A novel method for determining the X-ray beam angulation of the supraspinatus outlet view

Abstract

Background

Rapid and accurate quantification of the supraspinatus outlet view (SOV) is a clinical challenge.

Purpose

To quantify the X-ray beam angle of the SOV using the horizontal angle of the subscapular spine line (SSSL) and to further verify the feasibility of this method.

Material and Methods

A total of 119 patients who underwent shoulder computed tomography (CT) examination were enrolled in the retrospective study. Three-dimensional (3D) CT reconstruction was performed and manually adjusted to provide the position similar to SOV. The rotation angle of the 3D image along the long axis of the human body (marked as β) was obtained. The horizontal angle of SSSL (marked as α) was measured on the anteroposterior localizer image of shoulder CT. Pearson correlation and linear regression correlation analysis were performed. In addition, the first-time success rate between the experience-based group and the measurement-based group were compared to verify the novel method.

Results

We found a linear correlation between α and β (r = 0.962; P = 0.000). There was no significant correlation between the experience-based group and the measurement-based group in terms of age (P = 0.500), sex (P = 0.397), and side (P = 0.710), but there was a significant statistical difference in the first success rate between the two validation groups (χ² = 5.808^a, P = 0.016).

Conclusion

This novel quantitative measurement method for determining the X-ray beam angle of SOV using the horizontal angle of SSSL is feasible.

Keywords

Supraspinatus outlet view 3D CT reconstruction X-ray beam angle

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lewis

. Rotator cuff related shoulder pain: assessment, management and uncertainties. Manual Ther 2015;23:57–68.

Ellenbecker

Cools

. Rehabilitation of shoulder impingement syndrome and rotator cuff injuries: an evidence-based review. Brit J Sport Med 2010;44:319–327.

Kim

Choi

Lee

, et al. Ruling out rotator cuff tear in shoulder radiograph series using deep learning: redefining the role of conventional radiograph. Eur Radiol 2020;30:2843–2852.

Beard

Rees

Cook

, et al. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression for subacromial shoulder pain (CSAW): a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, placebo-controlled, three-group, randomised surgical trial. Lancet 2018;391:329–338.

Van Rijn

Huisstede

Koes

, et al. Associations between work-related factors and specific disorders of the shoulder - A systematic review of the literature. Scand J Work Env Hea 2010;36:189–201.

Lewis

. Rotator cuff tendinopathy/subacromial impingement syndrome: is it time for a new method of assessment? Brit J Sport Med 2009;43:259–264.

Roy

Cheyne

Andrews

, et al. Beyond the cuff: MR imaging of labroligamentous injuries in the athletic shoulder. Radiology 2016;278:316–332.

Lochmuller

Maier

Anetzberger

, et al. Determination of subacromial space width and inferior acromial mineralization by 3D CT - preliminary data from patients with unilateral supraspinatus outlet syndrome. Surg Radiol Anat 1997;19:329–337.

Cheng

Yang

, et al. The effect of percutaneous ultrasound-guided subacromial bursography using microbubbles in the assessment of subacromial impingement syndrome: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2015;25:2412–2418.

10.

Duralde

Gauntt

. Troubleshooting the supraspinatus outlet view. J Shoulder Elb Surg 1999;8:314–319.

11.

Lee

Lopez-Ben

, et al. The double-density sign: a radiographic finding suggestive of an os acromiale. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86–A:2666–2670.

12.

Meskers

CGM

Van Der Helm

FCT

Rozing

. The size of the supraspinatus outlet during elevation of the arm in the frontal and sagittal plane: a 3-D model study. Clin Biomech 2002;17:257–266.

13.

Mcquillen Martensen

. Radiographic image analysis. St Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders, 2006.

14.

Bontrager

Lampignano

. Textbook of radiographic positioning and related anatomy. St Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Mosby, 2009.

15.

Neer

Poppen

. Supraspinatus outlet. Orthop Trans 1987;11:234.

16.

Tuite

Toivonen

Orwin

, et al. Acromial angle on radiographs of the shoulder: correlation with the impingement syndrome and rotator cuff tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:609–613.

17.

Stallenberg

Rommens

Legrand

, et al. Radiographic diagnosis of rotator cuff tear based on the supraspinatus muscle radiodensity. Skeletal Radiol 2001;30:31–38.

18.

Liotard

Cochard

Walch

. Critical analysis of the supraspinatus outlet view: rationale for a standard scapular Y-view. J Shoulder Elb Surg 1998;7:134–139.

19.

Saupe

Pfirrmann

CWA

Schmid

, et al. Association between rotator cuff abnormalities and reduced acromiohumeral distance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:376–382.

20.

Rockwood

Green

Bucholz

. Rockwood and green’s fractures in adults. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott, 1991.

21.

Gohlke

Barthel

Gandorfer

. The influence of variations of the coracoacromial arch on the development of rotator cuff tears. Arch Orthop Traum Su 1993;113:28–32.

22.

Feldman

Marom

Nyska

, et al. The correlation of supraspinatus outlet view with computed tomography for visualization of the anterior acromial undersurface. Eur J Orthop Surg Tr 2018;28:207–212.

23.

Hyvönen

Päivänsalo

Lehtiniemi

, et al. Supraspinatus outlet view in the diagnosis of stages II and III impingement syndrome. Acta Radiol 2001;42:441–446.

24.

Williams

Morton

. Knowledge of practising radiographers of the supraspinatus outlet projection for shoulder impingement syndrome in the eastern cape, South Africa. Radiography 2016;22:e81–e85.

25.

Prato

Peloso

Franconeri

, et al. The anterior tilt of the acromion: radiographic evaluation and correlation with shoulder diseases. Eur Radiol 1998;8:1639–1646.

26.

Kitay

Joseph

Williams

, et al. Roentgenographic assessment of acromial morphologic condition in rotator cuff impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elb Surg 1995;4:441–448.