Mass and non-mass breast MRI patterns: a radiologic approach to sick lobe theory

Abstract

Background

According to sick lobe theory, one or more lobes of the breast are more prone to the development of carcinoma. However, the implications of this theory in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are unknown.

Purpose

To evaluate the MRI appearance of mass type (multifocal and multicentric diseases) and non-mass type (non-mass enhancements) sick lobe patterns, together with the histopathology results.

Material and Methods

MRI reports of 2015 patients in two tertiary breast imaging centers between June 2012 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed for multifocal–multicentric diseases and segmental, linear, and regional enhancements. A total of 113 patients were included. The specimens obtained by thick needle, vacuum, excisional biopsy/lumpectomy or mastectomy after breast MRI scans were pathologically assessed. The pathologic results were categorized as invasive carcinoma, precursor, and benign proliferative lesions according to the 2012 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors.

Results

The percentage of underlying benign and precursor invasive lesions was significantly different in patients with mass and non-mass MRI patterns. While the pathology results of mass type patterns were premalignant and malignant in all cases, nearly half of the underlying histologies were benign proliferative subtypes in patients with non-mass type patterns.

Conclusion

In this study, the mass and non-mass patterns derived from sick lobe theory were related to different risks of malignancy in the pathological examinations.

Keywords

Breast magnetic resonance imaging dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging pathology cancer

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cooper

AP.

Volume 1: on the anatomy of the breast. London: Longman, Orme, Green, Brown & Longmans, 1840.

Tot

Breast cancer: a lobar disease. London: Springer, 2011.

Tot

Subgross morphology, the sick lobe hypothesis, and the success of breast conservation. Int J Breast Cancer 2011; 2011:634021.

Tot

The theory of the sick breast lobe and the possible consequences. Int J Surg Pathol 2007; 15:369–375.

Tot

DCIS, cytokeratins, and the theory of the sick lobe. Virchows Archiv 2005; 447:1–8.

Going

JJ.

Ductal-lobar organisation of human breast tissue, its relevance in disease and a research objective: vector mapping of parenchyma in complete breasts (the Astley Cooper project). Breast Cancer Res 2006; 8:107.

Going

Mohun

TJ.

Human breast duct anatomy, the ‘sick lobe’ hypothesis and intraductal approaches to breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006; 97:285–291.

Amy

Durante

Tot

The lobar approach to breast ultrasound imaging and surgery. J Med Ultrason 2015; 42:331–339.

Tot

The role of large-format histopathology in assessing subgross morphological prognostic parameters: a single institution report of 1000 consecutive breast cancer cases. Int J Breast Cancer 2012; 2012:395415.

10.

Holland

Veling

SHJ

Mravunac

, et al. Histologic multifocality of tis, T1–2 breast carcinomas implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 1985; 56:979–990.

11.

Moon

Noh

D-Y

J-G.

Multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast cancers: bilateral whole-breast US in the preoperative evaluation of patients. Radiology 2002; 224:569–576.

12.

Sardanelli

Giuseppetti

Panizza

, et al. Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183:1149–1157.

13.

Mann

Cho

Moy

Breast MRI: state of the art. Radiology 2019; 292:520–536.

14.

Durur-Subasi I. DW-MRI of the breast: a pictorial review. Insights into Imaging 2019;10:61.

15.

Lakhani

Ellis

Schnitt

, et al. World Health Organization classification of tumors. Pathology and genetics of tumors of the breast and female genital organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press, 2012.

16.

Tot

Clinical relevance of the distribution of the lesions in 500 consecutive breast cancer cases documented in large-format histologic sections. Cancer 2007; 110:2551–2560.

17.

Tot

Gere

Pekár

, et al. Breast cancer multifocality, disease extent, and survival. Hum Pathol 2011; 42:1761–1769.

18.

Egan

RL.

Multicentric breast carcinomas: clinical‐radiographic‐pathologic whole organ studies and 10‐year survival. Cancer 1982; 49:1123–1130.

19.

Tot

Pekár

Hofmeyer

, et al. The distribution of lesions in 1–14-mm invasive breast carcinomas and its relation to metastatic potential. Virchows Archiv 2009; 455:109–115.

20.

Kuhl

Kuhn

Braun

, et al. Pre-operative staging of breast cancer with breast MRI: One step forward, two steps back? Breast 2007; 16:34–44.

21.

Van Goethem

Schelfout

Dijckmans

, et al. MR mammography in the pre-operative staging of breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: comparison with mammography and ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2004; 14:809–816.

22.

Grobmyer

Mortellaro

Marshall

, et al. Is there a role for routine use of MRI in selection of patients for breast-conserving cancer therapy? J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206:1045–1050.

23.

Amano

Ohuchi

Ishibashi

, et al. Correlation of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging with precise histopathological map concerning carcinoma extension in the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000; 60:43–55.

24.

Fischer

Kopka

Grabbe

Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999; 213:881–888.

25.

Durur-Subasi I, Durur-Karakaya A, Karaman A, et al. Value of MRI sequences for prediction of invasive breast carcinoma size. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2014;58:565–568.

26.

Durur-Subasi I, Durur-Karakaya A, Karaman A, et al. Is the necrosis/wall ADC ratio useful for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions? Br J Radiol 2017;90:20160803.

27.

Durur-Subasi I, Durur-Karakaya A, Alper F, et al. Breast lesions with high signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images. Jpn J Radiol 2013;31:653–661.

28.

Tot

The metastatic capacity of multifocal breast carcinomas: extensive tumors versus tumors of limited extent. Hum Pathol 2009; 40:199–205.

29.

American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. 5th ed. Reston, VA: ACR, 2013.

30.

Giess

Raza

Birdwell

RL.

Patterns of nonmasslike enhancement at screening breast MR imaging of high-risk premenopausal women. RadioGraphics 2013; 33:1343–1360.

31.

Wellings

SR.

A hypothesis of the origin of human breast cancer from the terminal ductal lobular unit. Pathol Res Pract 1980; 166:515–535.

32.

Tot

Cost-benefit analysis of using large-format histology sections in routine diagnostic breast care. Breast 2010; 19:284–288.

33.

Ibarra

JA.

The value of combined large format histopathology technique to assess the surgically removed breast tissue following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a single institution study of 40 Cases. Int J Breast Cancer 2012; 2012;361707.

34.

Tucker

FL.

Imaging-assisted large-format breast pathology: program rationale and development in a nonprofit health system in the United States. Int J Breast Cancer 2012; 2012;171792.

35.

Tucker

FL.

New era pathologic techniques in the diagnosis and reporting of breast cancers. Semin Breast Dis 2008; 11:140–147.

36.

Tan

Ong

Amy

, et al. Integrating anatomy, radiology, pathology, and surgery: an alternative approach in resecting multifocal and multicentric breast carcinoma. Breast J 2017; 23:663–669.

37.

Tan

Tot

The sick lobe hypothesis, field cancerisation and the new era of precision breast surgery. Gland Surg 2018; 7:611–618.