Abstract
Background
Due to the broad variability of the prostatic artery (PA), its origin, small calibers, and tortuous courses, prostatic arterial embolization (PAE) is challenging, time-consuming, and results in high radiation doses.
Purpose
To evaluate the accuracy of PA detection using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) performed from the aortic bifurcation in combination with a semi-automatic detection software in comparison to oblique view digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with internal iliac artery (IIA) injection.
Material and Methods
Twenty-two consecutive patients were included in this retrospective, IRB-approved study between July and December 2017. CBCT from the aorta and 30° oblique-view DSA from both IIAs were obtained for PA detection. Results of suggested PAs from the semi-automatic vessel detection software after CBCT and IIA DSA were compared. Moreover, dose area product (DAP) was recorded. Statistical analysis included Spearman’s correlation, Mann–Whitney U test, and the Wilcoxon test considering P<0.05 as significant.
Results
PA type was classified significantly better with CBCT compared to DSA (P=0.047). In IIA DSA, PAs could not be identified in 18% on the left and in 17% on the right side. CBCT detected all PAs, although truncation occurred in 59% because of the limited field of view. Mean DAP of the whole procedure was 257,161.32±127,909.36 mGy*cm2. Mean DAPs were for a single DSA 14,502.51±9,437.67 mGy*cm2 and for one CBCT 15,589.23±2,722.49 mGy*cm2. A mean of 14.82 DSAs and only one CBCT were performed. CBCT accounted for 6% and DSA for 84% of the entire DAP of the procedure.
Conclusion
CBCT with semi-automatic feeding vessel detection software detects PAs more accurately than IIA DSA and may reduce radiation dose.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.