Feasibility of extremely reduced-dose CT of the thoracic spine in human cadavers

Abstract

Background

According to the as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle, radiation exposure in computed tomography (CT) should be minimized while maintaining adequate image quality. Dedicated CT protocols combined with iterative reconstruction (IR) can reduce radiation dose and/or improve image quality.

Purpose

To investigate the feasibility of extremely reduced-dose (RD) CT of the thoracic spine in human cadavers using a standard-dose (SD) and three different RDCT protocols reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and IR.

Material and Methods

The thoracic spines of 11 cadavers were examined using different RDCT protocols with decreasing reference tube currents (RDCT-1: 50 mAs; RDCT-2: 30 mAs; RDCT-3: 10 mAs) at 140 kV. A clinical SDCT (70 mAs, 140 kV) served as reference. Raw data were reconstructed using FBP and two increasing levels of IR (IRL4 and IRL6). Images were evaluated for image quality, diagnostic acceptability, and visibility of anatomical structures according to a 5-point-scale.

Results

Regardless of the reconstruction technique, image quality was rated as diagnostically acceptable for all cadavers in SDCT and RDCT-1. Image quality of reconstructions with FBP were generally rated lower. Application of IR improved image quality ratings in SDCT and RDCT. RDCT-2 with IR was the most reduced-dose CT protocol which enabled diagnostically acceptable image quality in all cadavers. Compared to SDCT, RDCT protocols resulted in significantly reduced effective radiation doses (SDCT: 4.1 ± 1.5 mSv; RDCT-1: 2.9 ± 1.1 mSv; 2:1.7 ± 0.6 mSv; 3:0.6 ± 0.1 mSv; P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Diagnostically acceptable RDCT of the thoracic spine with 1.7 mSv is feasible using IR.

Keywords

Thoracic spine dose reduction cadaver iterative reconstruction image quality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Patel

Vaccaro

AR.

Thoracolumbar spine trauma classification.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010; 18:63–71.

Karul

Bannas

Schoennagel

, et al. Fractures of the thoracic spine in patients with minor trauma: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and dose of biplane radiography and MDCT. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82:1273–1277.

Inaba

Nosanov

Menaker

, et al. Prospective derivation of a clinical decision rule for thoracolumbar spine evaluation after blunt trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2015; 78:459–467.

Richards

George

Metelko

, et al. Spine computed tomography doses and cancer induction. Spine 2010; 35:430–433.

Padole

Khawaja

RDA

Kalra

, et al. CT radiation dose and iterative reconstruction techniques. Am J Roentgenol 2015; 204:W384–W392.

Weinrich JM, Well L, Regier M, et al. MDCT in suspected lumbar spine fracture: comparison of standard and reduced dose settings using iterative reconstruction. Clin Radiol 2018;73:675.e9–675.e15.

Lee

Yun

, et al. Diagnosis of lumbar spinal fractures in emergency department_ low-dose versus standard-dose CT using model-based iterative reconstruction. Clin Imaging 2018; 50:216–222.

Püschel

Teaching and research on corpses.

Rechtsmedizin 2016; 26:115–119.

Veldhoen S, Laqmani A, Derlin T, et al. 256-MDCT for evaluation of urolithiasis: iterative reconstruction allows for a significant reduction of the applied radiation dose while maintaining high subjective and objective image quality. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2014;58:283–290.

10.

Noël

Fingerle

Renger

, et al. Initial performance characterization of a clinical noise–suppressing reconstruction algorithm for MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197:1404–1409.

11.

American College of Radiology. ACR–ASNR–ASSR–SPR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Computed Tomography (CT) of the Spine. Reston, VA: ACR, 2016. Available at: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/CT-Spine.pdf (accessed March 2019).

12.

Deak

Smal

Kalender

WA.

Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product.

Radiology 2010; 257:158–166.

13.

Computed Tomography Subcommittee Task Group #204. Size specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. American Association of Physicists in Medicine Reports 2011. Available at: http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/default.asp (accessed March 2019).

14.

Laqmani A, Kurfürst M, Butscheidt S, et al. CT pulmonary angiography at reduced radiation exposure and contrast material volume using iterative model reconstruction and iDose4 technique in comparison to FBP. PLoS ONE 2011; 11: e0162429.

15.

Bongartz

Golding

Jurik

, et al. European guidelines for multislice computed tomography. Brussels: European Commission, 2004. Available at: http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/htmlindex.htm (accessed March 2019).

16.

McCollough

Kofler

, et al. Degradation of CT low-contrast spatial resolution due to the use of iterative reconstruction and reduced dose levels. Radiology 2015; 276:499–506.

17.

Fred A Mettler

Huda

Yoshizumi

, et al. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 2008; 248:254–263.

18.

Pantos

Thalassinou

Argentos

, et al. Adult patient radiation doses from non-cardiac CT examinations: a review of published results. Br J Radiol 2011; 84:293–303.

19.

Wintermark

Mouhsine

Theumann

, et al. Thoracolumbar spine fractures in patients who have sustained severe trauma: depiction with multi–detector row CT. Radiology 2003; 227:681–689.

20.

de Koning

de Bruin

van den Berg

, et al. Low-dose CT detects more progression of bone formation in comparison to conventional radiography in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results from the SIAS cohort. Ann Rheum Dis 2018; 77:293–299.

21.

Alshamari

Geijer

Norrman

, et al. Low dose CT of the lumbar spine compared with radiography: a study on image quality with implications for clinical practice. Acta Radiol 2016;57:602–611.

22.

Yang

Chiou

, et al. Imaging quality and diagnostic reliability of low-dose computed tomography lumbar spine for evaluating patients with spinal disorders. Spine J 2014; 14:2682–2690.

23.

Gleeson

Byrne

Kenny

, et al. Image quality in low-dose multidetector computed tomography: a pilot study to assess feasibility and dose optimization in whole-body bone imaging. Can Assoc Radiol J 2010; 61:258–264.

24.

Gleeson

Moriarty

Shortt

, et al. Accuracy of whole-body low-dose multidetector CT (WBLDCT) versus skeletal survey in the detection of myelomatous lesions, and correlation of disease distribution with whole-body MRI (WBMRI). Skeletal Radiol 2009; 38:225–236.

25.

Subhas

Pursyko

Polster

, et al. Dose reduction with dedicated CT metal artifact reduction algorithm: CT phantom study. Am J Roentgenol 2018; 210:593–600.