Abstract
Background
Computed tomography liver perfusion (CTLP) has been improved in recent years, offering a variety of perfusion-parametric maps. A map that better discriminates hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still to be found.
Purpose
To compare different CTLP maps, regarding their ability to differentiate cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic parenchyma from malignant HCC.
Material and Methods
Twenty-six patients (11 cirrhotic) with 50 diagnosed HCC lesions, underwent CTLP on a 128-row dual-energy CT system. Nine different maps were generated. Regions of interest (ROIs) were positioned on non-tumorous parenchyma and on HCCs found on previous magnetic resonance imaging. Perfusion parameters for non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic livers were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was employed to evaluate each map’s ability to discriminate HCCs from non-tumorous livers. Comparison of ROC curves was performed to evaluate statistical significance of differences in the discriminating efficiency of derived perfusion maps.
Results
Perfusion parameters for non-tumorous liver and HCCs recorded in cirrhotic patients did not significantly differ from corresponding values recorded in non-cirrhotic patients (P > 0.05). The highest power for HCC discrimination was found for the maximum-slope-of-increase (MSI) parametric map, with estimated the area under ROC curve of 0.997. An MSI cut-off criterion of 2.2 HU/s was found to provide 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Time to peak, blood flow, and transit time to peak were also found to have high discriminating power.
Conclusion
Among available CTLP-derived perfusion parameters, MSI was found to provide the highest diagnostic accuracy in discriminating HCCs from non-tumorous parenchyma. Perfusion parameters for non-tumorous livers and HCCs were not found to significantly differ between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
