Dual source abdominal computed tomography: the effect of reduced X-ray tube voltage and intravenous contrast media dosage in patients with reduced renal function

Abstract

Background

X-ray tube voltage (kVp) reduction increases intravenous contrast medium (CM) attenuation at computed tomography (CT), but tube output limits its use in large patients.

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility and image quality of reducing CM dose by low kVp and using dual X-ray source at liver CT.

Material and Methods

Patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 45 mL/min (n = 43) aged 60–91 years (75 ± 7.7), weighing 42–114 kg (75 ± 15) were prospectively scanned using a reduced CM dose of 0.25 or 0.3 g iodine (I)/kg with 70 or 80 kVp respectively, using either single-source or dual-source CT depending on patient size. Liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), liver noise, and muscle noise were quantitatively compared with those of 43 consecutive patients aged > 65 years with eGFR > 45 mL/min scanned using a standard abdominal protocol at 120 kVp after receiving 0.5 gI/kg.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in CNR, liver noise, or muscle noise at reduced CM protocols compared to the standard protocol: CNR was 4.6 (95% CI = 4.2–5.0) vs. 5.0 (95% CI = 4.5–5.5), liver noise was 11.1 (95% CI = 10.7–11.6) vs. 11.0 (95% CI = 10.5–11.6), muscle noise was 11.7 (95% CI = 11.2–12.1) vs. 10.8 (95% CI = 10.1–11.4). The mean SSDE was 70% higher with the reduced CM protocol.

Conclusion

CM dosage can be reduced by 40–50% with maintained measured noise and CNR in patients with BMIs of 15–36 kg/m² by lowering the tube voltage and dual-source CT scanning of the liver.

Keywords

Contrast media multidetector computed tomography radiographic image enhancement liver

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Stacul

van der Molen

Reimer

et al.

Contrast Media Safety Committee of European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR contrast media safety committee guidelines. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 2527–2541.

Adolph

Holdt-Lehmann

Chatterjee

et al.

Renal insufficiency following radiocontrast exposure trial (reinforce): a randomized comparison of sodium bicarbonate versus sodium chloride hydration for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy. Coron Artery Dis 2008; 19: 413–419.

Nyman

Almén

Jacobsson

et al.

Are intravenous injections of contrast media really less nephrotoxic than intra-arterial injections?

Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 1366–1371.

Thor

Brismar

Fischer

. Low tube voltage dual source computed tomography to reduce contrast media doses in adult abdomen examinations: A phantom study. Med Phys 2015; 42: 5100–5109.

Shen

Zou

et al.

Did low tube voltage CT combined with low contrast media burden protocols accomplish the goal of “double low” for patients? An overview of applications in vessels and abdominal parenchymal organs over the past 5 years. Int J Clin Pract 2016; 70(Suppl. 9B): B5–B15.

Seyal

Arslanoglu

Abboud

et al.

CT of the abdomen with reduced tube voltage in adults: A practical approach. Radiographics 2015; 35: 1922–1939.

Awai

Hori

. Effect of contrast injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight and fixed injection duration on aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector row CT. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 2155–2160.

Awai

Inoue

Yagyu

et al.

Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor to liver contrast at multidetector row CT. Radiology 2004; 233: 682–688.

Ichikawa

Erturk

Araki

. Multiphasic contrast enhanced multidetector row CT of liver: Contrast enhancement theory and practical scan protocol with a combination of fixed injection duration and patient body weight tailored dose of contrast material. Eur J of Radiol. 2006; 58: 165–176.

10.

Yanaga

Awai

Nakayama

et al.

Pancreas: Patient body weight tailored contrast material injection protocol versus fixed dose protocol at dynamic CT. Radiology 2007; 245: 475–482.

11.

Svensson

Nouhad

Cederlund

et al.

Hepatic contrast medium enhancement at computed tomography and its correlation with various body size measures. Acta Radiol 2012; 53: 601–606.

12.

National Research Council. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006.

13.

McCollough C, Edyvean S, Gould B, et al. The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT. AAPM Report 96. College Park, MD: AAPM, 2008.

14.

Boone JM, Strauss KJ, Code DD, et al. Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations. AAPM Report 204. College Park, MD: AAPM, 2011.

15.

Benjamini

Hochberg

. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 1995; 57: 289–300.

16.

Zhang

Liu

et al.

Double-low protocol for hepatic dynamic scan: Effect of low-dose iodine contrast agent on image quality. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95: e4004–e4004.

17.

Nakaura

Awai

Maruyama

et al.

Abdominal dynamic CT in patients with renal dysfunction: contrast agent dose reduction with low tube voltage and high tube current-time product setting at 256-detector row CT. Radiology 2011; 261: 467–476.

18.

Nakura

Nakamura

Maruyama

et al.

Low contrast agent and radiation dose protocol for hepatic dynamic CT of thin adults at 256 detector row CT: effect of low tube voltage and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm on image quality. Radiology 2012; 264: 445–454.

19.

Namimoto

Oda

Utsunomiya

et al.

Improvement of Image quality at low-radiation dose and low-contrast material dose abdominal CT in patients with cirrhosis: Intraindividual comparison of low tube voltage with iterative reconstruction algorithm and standard tube voltage. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2012; 36: 495–501.