Abstract
Background
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) has been widely used in clinical practice. However, the prognostic value of the pre-treatment standardized uptake value (SUV) for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains controversial.
Purpose
To investigate the prognostic role of pre-treatment 18F-FDG PET on SCLC patients by meta-analysis.
Material and Methods
Extensive literature searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were conducted to identify literature published until 5 May 2017. Comparative analyses of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed to assess their correlations with the pre-treatment maximum SUV (SUVmax). Either the fixed- or the random-effects model was adopted, depending on the heterogeneity observed across the studies. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results.
Results
Twelve studies with 1062 patients were included. The pooled HR for OS of 11 studies was 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI]โ=โ1.05โ1.22; Pโ=โ0.001; I2โ=โ0%) and the pooled HR for EFS of nine studies was 1.09 (95% CIโ=โ1.02โ1.17; Pโ=โ0.014; I2โ=โ0%), indicating that patients with high SUVs may have poorer prognoses. Beggโs test detected no significant publication bias. The prognostic role of the SUVmax remained similar in the subgroup analyses.
Conclusion
Our meta-analysis indicated that the pre-treatment SUVmax of primary lesions can be an important prognostic factor for OS and EFS in patients with SCLC. A high SUVmax may indicate poorer prognosis.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
