Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) may yield preoperative tumor biomarkers relevant for prognosis and therapy in cancer.

Purpose

To explore the value of preoperative DCE-MRI and DWI for the prediction of aggressive disease in endometrial cancer patients.

Material and Methods

Preoperative MRI (1.5-T) from 177 patients were analyzed and imaging parameters reflecting tumor microvasculature (from DCE-MRI) and tumor microstructure (from DWI) were estimated. The derived imaging parameters were explored in relation to clinico-pathological stage, histological subtype and grade, molecular markers, and patient outcome.

Results

Low tumor blood flow (F_b) and low rate constant for contrast agent intravasation (k_ep) were associated with high-risk histological subtype (P ≤ 0.04 for both) and tended to be associated with poor prognosis (P ≤ 0.09). Low tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and large tumor volume were both significantly associated with deep myometrial invasion (P < 0.001 for both) and were also unfavorable prognostic factors (P = 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

DCE-MRI and DWI represent valuable supplements to conventional MRI by providing preoperative imaging biomarkers that predict aggressive disease in endometrial cancer patients.

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)functional MRI MR diffusion/perfusion prognostic biomarker endometrial carcinoma

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amant

Moerman

Neven

et al.

Endometrial cancer. Lancet 2005; 366: 491–505.

Salvesen

Haldorsen

Trovik

. Markers for individualised therapy in endometrial carcinoma. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: e353–e361.

Haldorsen

Husby

Werner

HMJ

et al.

Standard 1.5-T MRI of endometrial carcinomas: modest agreement between radiologists. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 1601–1611.

Eltabbakh

Shamonki

Mount

. Surgical stage, final grade, and survival of women with endometrial carcinoma whose preoperative endometrial biopsy shows well-differentiated tumors. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 99: 309–312.

Frumovitz

Singh

Meyer

et al.

Predictors of final histology in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 95: 463–468.

Leitao

Jr. Kehoe

Barakat

et al.

Accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling diagnosis of FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111: 244–248.

Haldorsen

Salvesen

. Staging of endometrial carcinomas with MRI using traditional and novel MRI techniques. Clin Radiol 2012; 67: 2–12.

Kinkel

Kaji

et al.

Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiology 1999; 212: 711–718.

Haldorsen

Salvesen

. What is the best preoperative imaging for endometrial cancer? Curr Oncol Rep 2016; 18: 1–11.

10.

Todo

Choi

H-J

Kang

et al.

Clinical significance of tumor volume in endometrial cancer: a Japan–Korea cooperative study. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 131: 294–298.

11.

Ytre-Hauge

Husby

Magnussen

et al.

Preoperative tumor size at MRI predicts deep myometrial invasion, lymph node metastases, and patient outcome in endometrial carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 25: 459–466.

12.

Whittaker

Coady

Culver

et al.

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of female pelvic tumors: a pictorial review. Radiographics 2009; 29: 759–774.

13.

Husby

Salvesen

Magnussen

et al.

Tumor apparent diffusion coefficient is associated with depth of myometrial invasion and is negatively correlated to tumor volume in endometrial carcinomas. Clin Radiol 2015; 70: 487–494.

14.

Leach

Morgan

Tofts

et al.

Imaging vascular function for early stage clinical trials using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 1451–1464.

15.

Haldorsen

Stefansson

Gruner

et al.

Increased microvascular proliferation is negatively correlated to tumor blood flow and is associated with unfavourable outcome in endometrial carcinomas. Br J Cancer 2014; 110: 107–114.

16.

Haldorsen

Grüner

Husby

et al.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in endometrial carcinoma identifies patients at increased risk of recurrence. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 2916–2925.

17.

Lin

K-K

Chang

C-J

et al.

Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR Imaging—Initial Experience. Radiology 2009; 250: 784–792.

18.

Cao

Gao

Sun

et al.

Apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion weighted MRI in endometrial carcinoma-Relationship with local invasiveness. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 1926–1930.

19.

Nakamura

Imafuku

Nishida

et al.

Measurement of the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) of the primary tumor and CA125 are predictive of disease recurrence for patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 124: 335–339.

20.

Ippolito

Cadonici

Bonaffini

et al.

Semiquantitative perfusion combined with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in pre-operative evaluation of endometrial carcinoma: results in a group of 57 patients. Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 32: 464–472.

21.

Ippolito

Minutolo

Cadonici

et al.

Endometrial cancer: diagnostic value of quantitative measurements of microvascular changes with DCE-MR imaging. MAGMA 2014; 27: 531–538.

22.

Khalifa

Soliman

El-Baz

et al.

Models and methods for analyzing DCE-MRI: a review. Med Phys 2014; 41: 124301–124301.

23.

Pecorelli

. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 105: 103–104.

24.

Silverberg SG, Kurman RJ, Nogales F. Tumors of the uterine corpus. In: Tumors of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. Pathology and Genetics. Lyon: IACR Press Inc., 2003.

25.

Engelsen

Stefansson

Akslen

et al.

GATA3 expression in estrogen receptor α-negative endometrial carcinomas identifies aggressive tumors with high proliferation and poor patient survival. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 543–543.

26.

Trovik

Wik

Werner

HMJ

et al.

Hormone receptor loss in endometrial carcinoma curettage predicts lymph node metastasis and poor outcome in prospective multicentre trial. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49: 3431–3441.

27.

Tofts

. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 91–101.

28.

Tofts

Brix

Buckley

et al.

Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced t1-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 223–232.

29.

St Lawrence

Lee

. An adiabatic approximation to the tissue homogeneity model for water exchange in the brain: II. Experimental validation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998; 18: 1378–1385.

30.

Taxt

Jirik

Rygh

et al.

Single-channel blind estimation of arterial input function and tissue impulse response in DCE-MRI. IEEE trans Biomed Eng 2012; 59: 1012–1021.

31.

Thng

Koh

Collins

et al.

Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 1598–1609.

32.

Bredholt

Mannelqvist

Stefansson

et al.

Tumor necrosis is an important hallmark of aggressive endometrial cancer and associates with hypoxia, angiogenesis and inflammation responses. Oncotarget 2015; 6: 39676–39691.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.55 MB

0.57 MB

Preoperative quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging predict aggressive disease in endometrial cancer

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Material and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material