Diagnostic performance of advanced modeled iterative reconstruction applied images for detecting urinary stones on submillisievert low-dose computed tomography

Abstract

Background

Repeated computed tomography (CT) scans may be an issue in young adults with urinary stones. Therefore, it is important to know how far the dose can be reduced while maintaining the diagnostic performance.

Purpose

To generate a hypothesis that it is feasible to decrease the radiation dose to a sub-millisievert (mSv) level with the addition of advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) while maintaining the sensitivity to standard-dose CT (SDCT) for the detection of urinary stones.

Material and Methods

Ninety-two consecutive patients with urinary stones underwent non-enhanced CT that consisted of standard (120 kVp, 200 mAs) and lose-dose (LDCT) (80 kVp, 60 mAs). The LDCT images were reconstructed separately with five different strengths of ADMIRE (hereafter, S1–S5) and filtered back projection (FBP). Two blinded radiologists independently recorded a number of urinary stones in the six LDCT datasets and SDCT. The sensitivity of each set for detecting urinary stones was compared using the McNemar test.

Results

A total of 240 urinary stones were analyzed. The sensitivities of the six LDCT datasets showed no difference (FBP, S1–S5, for reader 1: 78%, 79%, 79%, 80%, 80%, and 80%; for reader 2: 64%, 63%, 64%, 64%, 65%, and 66%, P > 0.05, respectively), which were lower than those of SDCT for both readers (reader 1: 88%; reader 2: 81%, P < 0.0001, respectively).

Conclusion

Despite the addition of ADMIRE, it may not be feasible to decrease the radiation dose to a sub-mSv level while maintaining the sensitivity to SDCT for the detection of urinary stones.

Keywords

Iterative reconstruction computed tomography urinary stones

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beister

Kolditz

Kalender

. Iterative reconstruction methods in X-ray CT. Phys Med 2012; 28: 94–108.

Saiprasad

Filliben

Peskin

et al.

Evaluation of low-contrast detectability of iterative reconstruction across multiple institutions, CT scanner manufacturers, and radiation exposure levels. Radiology 2015; 277: 124–133.

Padole

Sainani

Lira

et al.

Assessment of sub-milli-sievert abdominal computed tomography with iterative reconstruction techniques of different vendors. World J Radiol 2016; 8: 618–627.

Gordic

Desbiolles

Stolzmann

et al.

Advanced modelled iterative reconstruction for abdominal CT: qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Clin Radiol 2014; 69: 497–504.

Martini

Barth

Higashigaito

et al.

Dose-optimized computed tomography for screening and follow-up of solid pulmonary nodules in obesity: a phantom study. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2016; 46: 204–209.

Chen

Ramirez Giraldo

Solomon

et al.

Evaluating iterative reconstruction performance in computed tomography. Med Phys 2014; 41: 121913–121913.

Solomon

Mileto

Ramirez-Giraldo

et al.

Diagnostic performance of an advanced modeled iterative reconstruction algorithm for low-contrast detectability with a third-generation dual-source multidetector CT scanner: potential for radiation dose reduction in a multireader study. Radiology 2015; 275: 735–745.

Scholtz

Kaup

Hüsers

et al.

Advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low-tube-voltage contrast-enhanced neck CT: evaluation of objective and subjective image quality. Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 143–150.

Schaller

Sedlmair

Raupach

et al.

Noise reduction in abdominal computed tomography applying iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE). Acad Radiol 2016; 23: 1230–1238.

10.

Lell

May

Brand

et al.

Imaging the parasinus region with a third-generation dual-source CT and the effect of tin filtration on image quality and radiation dose. Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 1225–1230.

11.

Bhatt

Monga

Remer

. Low-dose computed tomography in the evaluation of urolithiasis. J Endourol 2015; 29: 504–511.

12.

Romero

Akpinar

Assimos

. Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol 2010; 12: 86–96.

13.

Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, et al. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol 2017. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6.

14.

Worcester

Coe

. Nephrolithiasis. Prim Care 2008; 35: 369–391.

15.

Soenen

Balliauw

Oyen

et al.

Dose and image quality in low-dose CT for urinary stone disease: added value of automatic tube current modulation and iterative reconstruction techniques. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2017; 25: 242–249.

16.

Kluner

Hein

Gralla

et al.

Does ultra-low-dose CT with a radiation dose equivalent to that of KUB suffice to detect renal and ureteral calculi?

J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006; 30: 44–50.

17.

Dewes

Frellesen

Scholtz

et al.

Low-dose abdominal computed tomography for detection of urinary stone disease - Impact of additional spectral shaping of the X-ray beam on image quality and dose parameters. Eur J Radiol 2016; 85: 1058–1062.

18.

Kim

Baek

Yoon

et al.

Quarter regular dose non-enhanced CT for urinary stone: added value of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Acta Radiol 2014; 55: 1137–1144.

19.

Solomon

Wilson

Samei

. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability. Med Phys 2015; 42: 4941–4953.

20.

ICRP. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37: 2–4.

21.

American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT examinations. AAPM report no.204, College Park, MD: AAPM, 2011, pp. 1–26.

22.

Newell

Jr Fuld

Allmendinger

et al.

Very low-dose (0.15 mGy) chest CT protocols using the COPDGene 2 test object and a third-generation dual-source CT scanner with corresponding third-generation iterative reconstruction software. Invest Radiol 2015; 50: 40–45.

23.

Gordic

Morsbach

Schmidt

et al.

Ultralow-dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping. Invest Radiol 2014; 49: 465–473.

24.

Son

Kim

Yoon

et al.

Comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and filtered back projection for detecting hepatic metastases on submillisievert low-dose computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2017; 41: 644–650.

25.

Scholtz

Wichmann

Hüsers

et al.

Automated tube voltage adaptation in combination with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in thoracoabdominal third-generation 192-slice dual-source computed tomography: effects on image quality and radiation dose. Acad Radiol 2015; 22: 1081–1087.