Rejection evaluation after renal transplantation using MR diffusion tensor imaging

Abstract

Background

Renal allograft dysfunction monitoring is mainly performed using the serum creatinine (SC) level, Doppler ultrasound (US), or renal biopsy. Recently proposed diffusion-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods have been explored as new, non-invasive tools for assessing renal function after transplantation.

Purpose

To investigate the value of fractional anisotropy (FA) measurements in the evaluation of acute rejection cases after renal transplant.

Material and Methods

Doppler US and MRI diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) were performed in 21 patients with graft dysfunction requiring graft biopsy after renal transplantation and in 21 patients with normal graft function. The MR examinations were performed on a 1.5-T MRI using two b-values (0 and 800 s/mm²). FA values were measured from the cortex and medulla of the transplanted kidney at the upper, middle, and lower poles.

Results

Twenty-one transplant patients diagnosed with acute rejection (Group 1) were compared to the control group of 21 transplant patients with normal graft function (Group 2). The measured FA values of the medulla were 0.19 ± 0.02 and 0.22 ± 0.05 (P = 0.017) for Groups 1 and 2, respectively. On the other hand, the measured FA values of the renal cortex were 0.18 ± 0.04 and 0.18 ± 0.04 (P = 0.97) for Groups 1 and 2, respectively.

Conclusion

The good correlation between the renal medulla FA values and allograft function shows that MR DTI has potential for non-invasive functional assessment of transplanted kidneys. On the other hand, the renal cortex FA values had no correlation with the allograft function.

Keywords

Renal transplant acute rejection magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)fractional anisotropy (FA)diffusion tensor imaging

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Egawa

Tanabe

Fukushima

et al.

Current status of organ transplantation in Japan. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 523–530.

Waikar

Betensky

Bonventre

. Creatinine as the gold standard for kidney injury biomarker studies? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24: 3263–3265.

Nankivell

Kuypers

. Diagnosis and prevention of chronic kidney allograft loss. Lancet 2011; 378: 1428–1437.

Nyman

Cappelen-Smith

Al Suhaibani

et al.

Yield and complications in percutaneous renal biopsy. A comparison between ultrasound-guided gun-biopsy and manual techniques in native and transplant kidneys. Acta Radiol 1997; 38: 431–436.

Mahoney

Racadio

Merhar

et al.

Safety and efficacy of kidney transplant biopsy: Tru-Cut needle vs sonographically guided biopty gun. Am J Roentgenol 1993; 160: 325–326.

Ahmad

. Biopsy of the transplanted kidney. Semin Intervent Radiol 2004; 21: 275–281.

Solez

Axelsen

Benediktsson

et al.

International standardization of criteria for the histologic diagnosis of renal allograft rejection: The Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Kidney Int 1993; 44: 411–422.

Haas

Sis

Racusen

et al.

Banff 2013 meeting report: inclusion of c4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection and antibody-associated arterial lesions. Am J Transplant 2014; 14: 272–283.

Granata

DiNicolò

Scarfia

et al.

Renal transplantation parenchymal complications: what Doppler ultrasound can and cannot do. J Ultrasound 2014; 18: 109–116.

10.

Kolonko

Szotowska

Kuczera

et al.

Extra renal factors influencing resistance index in stable kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation 2013; 96: 406–412.

11.

Thoeny

De Keyzer

. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of native and transplanted kidneys. Radiology 2011; 259: 25–38.

12.

Eisenberger

Thoeny

Binser

et al.

Evaluation of renal allograft function early after transplantation with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 1374–1383.

13.

Wypych-Klunder

Adamowicz

Lemanowicz

et al.

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of transplanted kidneys: Preliminary report. Pol J Radiol 2014; 79: 94–98.

14.

Christian

. The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system- a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002; 15: 435–455.

15.

Fukuda

Ohashi

Hanafusa

et al.

Anisotropic diffusion in kidney: apparent diffusion coefficient measurements for clinical use. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11: 156–160.

16.

Ries

Jones

Basseau

et al.

Diffusion tensor MRI of the human kidney. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14: 42–49.

17.

Basser

Mattiello

LeBihan

. Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from NMR spin echo. J Magn Reson B 1994; 103: 247–254.

18.

Mukherjee

Berman

Chung

et al.

Diffusion tensor MR imaging and fiber tractography: theoretic underpinnings. Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 632–641.

19.

Liu

Zhang

et al.

Chronic kidney disease: pathological and functional assessment with diffusion tensor imaging at 3T MR. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 652–660.

20.

Wang

Pui

Guo

et al.

3T magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in chronic kidney disease. Abdom Imaging 2014; 39: 770–775.

21.

Gaudiano

Clementi

Busato

et al.

Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography of the kidneys: assessment of chronic parenchymal diseases. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 1678–1685.

22.

Al-Awwa

Hariharan

First

. The importance of allograft biopsy in renal transplant recipients. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 31: 15–18.

23.

Nickeleit V, Mengel M, Colvin RB. Renal Transplant Pathology, In: Heptinstall's Pathology of the Kidney. Philadelphia, MD: Wolters Kluwer, 2015:1321–1460.

24.

Thoeny

Zumstein

Simon-Zoula

et al.

Functional evaluation of transplanted kidneys with diffusion-weighted and BOLD MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2006; 241: 812–821.

25.

Fan

Ren

et al.

Assessment of renal allograft function early after transplantation with isotropic resolution diffusion tensor imaging. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 567–575.

26.

Siegel

Aisen

Ellis

et al.

Feasibility of MR diffusion studies in the kidney. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 5: 617–620.

27.

Ries

Jones

Basseau

et al.

Diffusion tensor MRI of the human kidney. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14: 42–49.

28.

Notohamiprodjo

Glaser

Herrmann

et al.

Diffusion tensor imaging of the kidney with parallel imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol 2008; 43: 677–685.

29.

Hueper

Gutberlet

Rodt

et al.

Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography for assessment of renal allograft dysfunction-initial results. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 2427–2433.

30.

Lanzman

Ljimani

Pentang

et al.

Kidney transplant: functional assessment with diffusion-tensor MR imaging at 3T. Radiology 2013; 266: 218–225.

31.

Hueper

Khalifa

Bräsen

et al.

Diffusion-Weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging detect delayed graft function and correlate with allograft fibrosis in patients early after kidney transplantation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016; 44: 112–121.

32.

Sedor

Gulani

et al.

Use of diffusion tensor MRI to identify early changes in diabetic nephropathy. Am J Nephrol 2011; 34: 476–482.