Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Computed tomography venography (CTV) at low kVp using model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) can enhance vascular enhancement with noise reduction.

Purpose

To evaluate image qualities and radiation doses of CTV at 80 kVp using MBIR and a small iodine contrast media (CM) dose and to compare these with those of CTV performed using a conventional protocol.

Material and Methods

Sixty-five patients (mean age = 58.1 ± 7.2 years) that underwent CTV for the evaluation of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and varicose veins were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (35 patients, 80 kVp, MBIR, automatic tube current modulation, CM = 270 mg/mL, 100 mL) and Group B (30 patients, 100 kVp, filtered back projection [FBP], 120 fixed mA, CM = 370 mg/mL, 120 mL). Objective and subjective image qualities of inferior vena cava (IVC), femoral vein (FV), and popliteal vein (PV) were assessed and radiation doses were recorded.

Results

Mean vascular enhancement in group A was significantly lower than in group B (P < 0.01). Noise in group A was significantly lower than in group B except for PV and contrast-to-noise ratio were not significantly different in the two groups (P > 0.05). In addition, radiation dose in group A was significantly lower than in group B (P < 0.001). Subjective image quality comparison revealed group A was statistically inferior to group B except for subjective image noise.

Conclusion

CTV at 80 kVp using MBIR with small iodine contrast dose provided acceptable image quality at a lower radiation dose than conventional CTV using FBP.

Keywords

Diagnosis radiography multidetector computed tomography lower extremity veins

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cho

Chung

Kim

et al.

CT venography for deep vein thrombosis using a low tube voltage (100 kVp) setting could increase venous enhancement and reduce the amount of administered iodine. Korean J Radiol 2013; 14: 183–193.

Son

Choo

Jeon

et al.

Image quality of CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease: comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 31(Suppl. 1): 31–38.

Ichikawa

Kitagawa

Nagasawa

et al.

CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. BMC Med Imaging 2013; 13: 27–27.

Nelson

Feuerlein

Boll

. New iterative reconstruction techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography: how do they work, and what are the advantages and disadvantages? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011; 5: 286–292.

Yasaka

Katsura

Akahane

et al.

Model-based iterative reconstruction for reduction of radiation dose in abdominopelvic CT: comparison to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Springerplus 2013; 2: 209–209.

Kim

Choo

Moon

et al.

Comparison of the image qualities of filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction for CT venography at 80 kVp. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 2055–2063.

Fujikawa

Matsuoka

Kuramochi

et al.

Vascular enhancement and image quality of CT venography: comparison of standard and low kilovoltage settings. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 838–843.

Nakaura

Awai

Oda

et al.

A low-kilovolt (peak) high-tube current technique improves venous enhancement and reduces the radiation dose at indirect multidetector-row CT venography: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011; 35: 141–147.

Miglioretti

Johnson

Williams

et al.

The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. JAMA Pediatr 2013; 167: 700–707.

10.

Nguyen

Suranyi

Ravenel

et al.

Iso-osmolality versus low-osmolality iodinated contrast medium at intravenous contrast-enhanced CT: effect on kidney function. Radiology 2008; 248: 97–105.

11.

Kulkarni

Uppot

Eisner

et al.

Radiation dose reduction at multidetector CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: how low can we go?

Radiology 2012; 265: 158–166.

12.

Matsuoka

Hunsaker

Gill

et al.

Vascular enhancement and image quality of MDCT pulmonary angiography in 400 cases: comparison of standard and low kilovoltage settings. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 1651–1656.

13.

Park

Choo

Jeon

et al.

Image quality and radiation dose of 128-slice dual-source CT venography using low kilovoltage combined with high-pitch scanning and automatic tube current modulation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 29(Suppl. 1): 47–51.

14.

Schueller-Weidekamm

Schaefer-Prokop

Weber

et al.

CT angiography of pulmonary arteries to detect pulmonary embolism: improvement of vascular enhancement with low kilovoltage settings. Radiology 2006; 241: 899–907.

15.

Volders

Bols

Haspeslagh

et al.

Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases. Radiology 2013; 269: 469–474.

16.

Smith

Dillman

Goodsitt

et al.

Model-based iterative reconstruction: effect on patient radiation dose and image quality in pediatric body CT. Radiology 2014; 270: 526–534.

17.

Begemann

Bonacker

Kemper

et al.

Evaluation of the deep venous system in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism with multi-detector CT: a prospective study in comparison to Doppler sonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003; 27: 399–409.

18.

Yankelevitz

Gamsu

Shah

et al.

Optimization of combined CT pulmonary angiography with lower extremity CT venography. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 67–69.

19.

Cham

Yankelevitz

Shaham

et al.

Deep venous thrombosis: detection by using indirect CT venography. The Pulmonary Angiography-Indirect CT Venography Cooperative Group. Radiology 2000; 216: 744–751.

20.

Baldt

Zontsich

Stumpflen

et al.

Deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity: efficacy of spiral CT venography compared with conventional venography in diagnosis. Radiology 1996; 200: 423–428.

21.

Wintersperger

Jakobs

Herzog

et al.

Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings: improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 334–341.

22.

Golledge

Quigley

. Pathogenesis of varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003; 25: 319–324.

23.

Oda

Utsunomiya

Awai

et al.

Indirect computed tomography venography with a low-tube-voltage technique: reduction in the radiation and contrast material dose–a prospective randomized study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011; 35: 631–636.

24.

Rosendaal

Van HylckamaVlieg

Tanis

et al.

Estrogens, progestogens and thrombosis. J ThrombHaemost 2003; 1: 1371–1380.

25.

Tatsugami

Husmann

Herzog

et al.

Evaluation of a body mass index-adapted protocol for low-dose 64-MDCT coronary angiography with prospective ECG triggering. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 635–638.

26.

Irie

Inoue

. Individual modulation of the tube current-seconds to achieve similar levels of image noise in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 1514–1518.

27.

Mieville

Gudinchet

Brunelle

et al.

Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments–a phantom approach. Phys Med 2013; 29: 99–110.

28.

Goodman

Stein

Matta

et al.

CT venography and compression sonography are diagnostically equivalent: data from PIOPED II. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 1071–1076.

Image quality and radiation dose of CT venography with double dose reduction using model based iterative reconstruction: comparison with conventional CT venography using filtered back projection

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Material and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References