Early evaluation of radiation-induced parotid damage with diffusion kurtosis imaging: a preliminary study

Abstract

Background

Radiation-induced parotid gland damage is a common complication of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), which always causes xerostomia, dysphagia, dental caries, and even sleep disorders. Early evaluation of radiation-induced parotid damage is required to facilitate early interventions.

Purpose

To early-evaluate radiation-induced parotid damage using diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in patients with NPC undergoing RT.

Material and Methods

Thirty-two patients with NPC underwent DKI for parotid glands pre-RT (two weeks before RT), mid-RT (five weeks after RT began), and post-RT (four weeks after RT). Parotid volume, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), corrected diffusion coefficient (D), excess diffusion kurtosis coefficient (K) values, mean radiation dose, and xerostomia degrees were recorded and analyzed.

Results

During RT, parotid ADC (change rates = 41.3 ± 25.2% at mid-RT, 70.8 ± 34.3% at post-RT) and D (change rates = 41.9 ± 25.2% at mid-RT, 63.2 ± 30.2% at post-RT) increased, while parotid volume (atrophy rates = 31.5 ± 7.9% at mid-RT, 30.6 ± 10.3% at post-RT) and K (change rates = –17.8 ± 11.0% at mid-RT, –29.8 ± 9.0% at post-RT) decreased significantly (all P < 0.001). At post-RT, the change rate of parotid D values was significantly positively correlated with the mean radiation dose (r = 0.455, P < 0.001). Parotid ADC, D, and K values showed excellent intra- and inter-observer agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.946-0.985).

Conclusion

Radiation-induced parotid damage in patients with NPC undergoing RT could be effectively evaluated by DKI in the early stage.

Keywords

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiation-induced parotid damage magnetic resonance imaging diffusion kurtosis imaging radiotherapy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

de Castro

Federico

. Evaluation, prevention and management of radiotherapy induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients. Curr Opin Oncol 2006; 18: 266–270.

Kam

Leung

Zee

et al.

Prospective randomized study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on salivary gland function in early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 4873–4879.

Anand

Jain

Negi

et al.

Can dose reduction to one parotid gland prevent xerostomia? — a feasibility study for locally advanced head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Clin Oncol 2006; 18: 497–504.

Konings

Coppes

Vissink

. On the mechanism of salivary gland radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 62: 1187–1194.

Cox

Stetz

Pajak

. Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31: 1341–1346.

Al-Nawas

Kunkel

et al.

Quantifying radioxerostomia: salivary flow rate, examiner’s score, and quality of life questionnaire. Strahlenther Onkol 2006; 182: 336–341.

Konings

AWT

Faber

Cotteleer

et al.

Secondary radiation damage as the main cause for unexpected volume effects: a histopathologic study of the parotid gland. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 64: 98–105.

Abdel Razek AA, Mukherji S. Imaging of sialadenitis. Neuroradiol J 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1971400916682752.

Teshima

Murakami

Tomitaka

et al.

Radiation-induced parotid gland changes in oral cancer patients: correlation between parotid volume and saliva production. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2010; 40: 42–46.

10.

Yang

Tridandapani

Beitler

et al.

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonic histogram features to evaluate radiation toxicity of the parotid glands: a clinical study of xerostomia following head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy. Acad Radiol 2014; 21: 1304–1313.

11.

Traxler

Hajek

Solar

et al.

Magnetic resonance in lesions of the parotid gland. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 20: 170–174.

12.

Houweling

Schakel

van den Berg

et al.

MRI to quantify early radiation-induced changes in the salivary glands. Radiother Oncol 2011; 100: 386–389.

13.

Astreinidou

Roesink

Raaijmakers

et al.

3D MR sialography as a tool to investigate radiation-induced xerostomia: feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 68: 1310–1319.

14.

Astreinidou

Raaymakers

Roesink

et al.

3D MR sialography protocol for postradiotherapy follow-up of the salivary duct system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 556–562.

15.

Juan

Chen

Jen

et al.

Perfusion characteristics of late radiation injury of parotid glands: quantitative evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 94–102.

16.

Dirix

De Keyzer

Vandecaveye

et al.

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate major salivary gland function before and after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 71: 1365–1371.

17.

Rosenkrantz

Sigmund

Winnick

et al.

Assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma using apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion kurtosis indices: preliminary experience in fresh liver explants. Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 30: 1534–1540.

18.

Stephens

King

Peters

et al.

Acute and late radiation injury in rhesus monkey parotid glands. Evidence of interphase cell death. Am J Pathol 1986; 124: 469–478.

19.

Radfar

Sirois

. Structural and functional injury in minipig salivary glands following fractionated exposure to 70 Gy of ionizing radiation: an animal model for human radiation-induced salivary gland injury. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96: 267–274.

20.

Jensen

Helpern

Ramani

et al.

Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 1432–1440.

21.

Wang

et al.

Diffusion kurtosis imaging study on temporal lobe after nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy. Brain Res 2016; 1648: 387–393.

22.

Rosenkrantz

Sigmund

Johnson

et al.

Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer. Radiology 2012; 264: 126–135.

23.

Markwardt CB. Non-linear least-squares fitting in IDL with MPFIT. In: Bohlender DA, Durand D, Dowler P, eds. Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series. San Francisco: Astronomical Soc Pacific, 2009:251–254.

24.

Marzi

Forina

Marucci

et al.

Early radiation-induced changes evaluated by intravoxel incoherent motion in the major salivary glands. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 41: 974–982.

25.

Le Bihan

. Apparent diffusion coefficient and beyond: what diffusion MR imaging can tell us about tissue structure. Radiology 2013; 268: 318–322.

26.

Zhou

Chu

Dou

et al.

Early evaluation of irradiated parotid glands with intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging: correlation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. BMC Cancer 2016; 16: 865–865.

27.

Lima

Le Bihan

. Clinical intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion MR imaging: past, present, and future. Radiology 2016; 278: 13–32.

28.

Juan

Cheng

Chiu

et al.

Temporal evolution of parotid volume and parotid apparent diffusion coefficient in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy investigated by magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study. PLoS One 2015; 10: e137073–e137073.

29.

Maes

Weltens

Flamen

et al.

Preservation of parotid function with uncomplicated conformal radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2002; 63: 203–211.