Radiography and abdominal CT compared with sacroiliac joint CT in the diagnosis of sacroiliitis

Abstract

Background

The presence of structural sacroiliitis is strong evidence for the diagnosis of spondyloarthritis (SpA).

Purpose

To assess the performance of abdominal computed tomography (CT) and pelvic plain radiography for the diagnosis of structural sacroiliitis compared with sacroiliac CT (SI joint CT) considered the reference technique in patients with SpA.

Material and Methods

All SpA patients eligible for biologic treatment were selected from 2005 to 2012. An assessment of sacroiliitis was based on radiography according to the modified New York criteria and on abdominal CT and SI joint CT scans depending on the presence of erosion on at least two consecutive slices. A senior rheumatologist and radiologist independently scored the grade and diagnosis of structural sacroiliitis for the three imaging modalities. After a consensus reading of conflicting examinations (radiography and CT), a final diagnosis of structural sacroiliitis was attained.

Results

Of the 72 patients selected, sacroiliitis was diagnosed on radiography, abdominal CT, and SI joint CT in 40, 31, and 44 patients, respectively. Inter-reader agreements for the grade of sacroiliitis were substantial for the three imaging modalities, with a weighted kappa range of 0.63–0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–0.83), and they were moderate for the diagnosis of sacroiliitis, with a kappa range of 0.50–0.55 (95% CI, 0.32–0.74). The sensitivity and specificity were 79.1% and 70.5%, respectively, for radiography and 82.1% and 100%, respectively, for abdominal CT.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the relevance of abdominal CT for the diagnosis of structural sacroiliitis, with good sensitivity and excellent specificity. These imaging techniques avoid unnecessary examinations.

Keywords

Spondyloarthritis structural sacroiliitis computed tomography (CT)conventional radiography

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bennett

Burch

. New York symposium on population studies in the rheumatic diseases: new diagnostic criteria. Bull Rheum Dis 1967; 17: 453–458.

Van der Linden

Valkenburg

Cats

. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 1984; 27: 361–368.

Rudwaleit

Van der Heijde

Landewé

et al.

The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 777–783.

Aydin

Maksymowych

Bennett

et al.

Validation of the ASAS criteria and definition of a positive MRI of the sacroiliac joint in an inception cohort of axial spondyloarthritis followed up for 8 years. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71: 56–60.

Oostveen

Prevo

den Boer

et al.

Early detection of sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent development of sacroiliitis on plain radiography. A prospective, longitudinal study. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 1953–1958.

Bennett

McGonagle

O’Connor

et al.

Severity of baseline magnetic resonance imaging-evident sacroiliitis and HLA-B27 status in early inflammatory back pain predict radiographically evident ankylosing spondylitis at eight years. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 58: 3413–3418.

Døhn

Ejbjerg

Hasselquist

et al.

Rheumatoid arthritis bone erosions volume on CT and MRI: reliability and correlations with erosion score on CT, MRI and radiography. Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66: 1388–1392.

Dalbeth

Doyle

Boyer

et al.

Development of a computed tomography method of scoring bone erosion in patients with gout: validation and clinical implications. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011; 50: 410–416.

Dalbeth

Clark

Gregory

et al.

Mechanism of bone erosions in gout: a quantitative analysis using plain radiography and computed tomography. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 1290–1295.

10.

Devauchelle-Pensec

D’Agostino

Marion

et al.

Computed tomography scanning facilitates the diagnosis of sacroiliitis in patients with suspected spondylarthritis: results of a prospective multicenter French cohort study. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 1412–1419.

11.

Lee

Hwang

Lee

et al.

The clinical usefulness of multidetector computed tomography of the sacroiliac joint for evaluating spondyloarthropathies. Korean J Intern Med 2007; 22: 171–177.

12.

Feng

Dion

et al.

Comparison of radiography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of sacroiliitis accompanying ankylosing spondylitis. Skeletal Radiol 1998; 27: 311–320.

13.

Fam

Rubenstein

Chin-Sang

et al.

Computed tomography in the diagnosis of early ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 1985; 28: 930–937.

14.

Guglielmi

Cascavilla

Scalzo

et al.

Imaging findings of sacroiliac joints in spondyloarthropathies and other rheumatic conditions. Radiol Med 2011; 116: 292–301.

15.

Guglielmi

Scalzo

Cascavilla

et al.

Imaging of the sacroiliac joint involvement in seronegative spondylarthropathies. Clin Rheumatol 2009; 28: 1007–1109.

16.

Puhakka

Jurik

Egund

et al.

Imaging of sacroiliitis in early seronegative spondylarthropathy. Assessment of abnormalities by MRI in comparison with radiography and CT. Acta Radiol 2003; 44: 218–229.

17.

Geijer

Gadeholt Göthlin

Göthlin

. The validity of the New York radiological grading criteria in diagnosing sacoiliitis by computer tomography. Acta Radiol 2009; 50: 664–673.

18.

Geijer

Göthlin

. Observer variation in computed tomography of the sacroiliac joints: a retrospective analysis of 1383 cases. Acta Radiol 2007; 48: 665–671.

19.

Geijer

Göthlin

. The clinical utility of computed tomography compared to conventional radiography in diagnosing sacroiliitis. A retrospective study on 910 patients and literature review. J Rheumatol 2007; 34: 1561–1565.

20.

Geijer

Sihlbom

Göthlin

et al.

The role of CT in the diagnosis of sacro-iliitis. Acta Radiol 1998; 39: 265–268.

21.

Fewins

Whitehouse

Bucknall

. Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of suspected sacroiliac joint disease. J R Soc Med 1990; 83: 430–432.

22.

Borlaza

Seigel

Kuhns

et al.

Computed tomography in the evaluation of sacroiliac arthritis. Radiology 1981; 139: 437–440.

23.

Yagan

Khan

Marmolya

. Role of abdominal CT, when available in patients’ records, in the evaluation of degenerative changes of the sacroiliac joints. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987; 12: 1046–1051.

24.

Slobodin

Croitoru

Starikov

et al.

Incidental computed tomography sacroiliitis: clinical significance and inappropriateness of the New York radiological grading criteria for the diagnosis. Clin Rheumatol 2012; 31: 425–428.

25.

Lee

Hong

Park

et al.

Value of multidetector computed tomography for the radiologic grading of sacroiliitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 2013; 33: 1005–1011.

26.

Van den Berg

Lenczner

Feydy

et al.

Reading of sacroiliac joint on pelvic radiographs: Agreement between clinical practice and trained central reading. Results of the DESIR-cohort. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014; 66: 2403–2411.

27.

Blum

Buitrago-Tellez

Mundinger

et al.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection of active sacroiliitis: a prospective study comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, and contrast enhanced MRI. J Rheumatol 1996; 23: 2107–2115.

28.

Docherty

Mitchell

MacMillan

et al.

Magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of sacroiliitis. J Rheumatol 1992; 19: 393–401.

29.

Van Tubergen

Heuft-Dorenbosch

Schulpen

et al.

Radiographic assessment of sacroiliitis by radiologists and rheumatologists: does training improve quality?

Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 519–525.

30.

Vogler

3rd Brown

Helms

et al.

The normal sacroiliac joint: a CT study of asymptomatic patients. Radiology 1984; 151: 433–437.