Power Doppler signal calibration in the finger joint between two models of ultrasound machine: a pilot study using a phantom and joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

Background

Despite the advantages of ultrasound (US) in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, power Doppler (PD) US may be highly dependent on the type of US machine used.

Purpose

To present a method to calibrate the PD signal of two models of US machines by use of a flow phantom and finger joints of patients with RA.

Material and Methods

For the phantom study, the PD signal count was measured in the flow phantom perfusing blood mimicking fluid at various injection rates and pulse repetition frequencies (PRFs). The quantitative PD index was calculated with ImageJ. For the clinical study, the second and third metacarpophalangeal joints of five consecutive patients with RA were examined. The quantitative PD index was measured at various PRFs by use of two models of machine (the same models as the phantom study).

Results

For the phantom and clinical studies, negative correlations were found between the PRF and the quantitative PD index when the flow velocity was constant and positive correlations between flow velocity and the quantitative PD index at constant PRF. There was a significant difference in the depiction performance of synovial blood flow between the two models, which can be calibrated by adjusting the PRF values derived from the phantom study in each model.

Conclusion

Signal calibration of pannus vascularity between US machines may be possible by adjusting the PRF value according to flow phantom data. Different US machines can thus provide equivalent examination results concerning the pannus vascularity.

Keywords

Power Doppler signal calibration finger joint phantom rheumatoid arthritis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Newman

Adler

Bude

et al.

Detection of soft-tissue hyperemia: value of power Doppler sonography. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163: 385–389.

Backhaus

Kamradt

Sandrock

et al.

Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 1232–1245.

Newman

Laing

McCarthy

et al.

Power Doppler sonography of synovitis: assessment of therapeutic response–preliminary observations. Radiology 1996; 198: 582–584.

Browne

Watson

Hoskins

et al.

Validation of a sensitivity performance index test protocol and evaluation of colour Doppler sensitivity for a range of ultrasound scanners. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004; 30: 1475–1483.

Albrecht

Grob

Lange

et al.

Reliability of different Doppler ultrasound quantification methods and devices in the assessment of therapeutic response in arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008; 47: 1521–1526.

Koski

Saarakkala

Helle

et al.

Power Doppler ultrasonography and synovitis: correlating ultrasound imaging with histopathological findings and evaluating the performance of ultrasound equipments. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 1590–1595.

Kamishima

Nishida

Horie

et al.

Power Doppler signal calibration using capillary phantom for pannus vascularity in rheumatoid finger joint. A pilot study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2011; 29: 1057–1057.

Sakano

Kamishima

Nishida

et al.

Power Doppler signal calibration between ultrasound machines by use of a capillary-flow phantom for pannus vascularity in rheumatoid finger joints: a basic study. Radiol Phys Technol 2015; 8: 120–124.

Ramnarine

Nassiri

Hoskins

et al.

Validation of a new blood-mimicking fluid for use in Doppler flow test objects. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998; 24: 451–459.

10.

Veltmann

Lohmaier

Schlosser

et al.

On the design of a capillary flow phantom for the evaluation of ultrasound contrast agents at very low flow velocities. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28: 625–634.

11.

Chogle

Desai

Jhankaria

. American Rheumatism Association 1958 and 1987 revised criteria for rheumatoid arthritis–how useful to the clinician. J Assoc Physicians India 1996; 44: 93–97.

12.

Backhaus

Burmester

Gerber

et al.

Guidelines for musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 641–649.

13.

Szkudlarek

Court-Payen

Jacobsen

et al.

Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 48: 955–962.

14.

Torp-Pedersen

Terslev

. Settings and artefacts relevant in colour/power Doppler ultrasound in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 143–149.

15.

Kamishima

Tanimura

Henmi

et al.

Power Doppler ultrasound of rheumatoid synovitis: quantification of vascular signal and analysis of interobserver variability. Skeletal Radiol 2009; 38: 467–472.