Incidence of combined cranial and cervical spine injuries in patients with blunt minor trauma: are combined CT examinations of the head and cervical spine justified?

Abstract

Background

The use of computed tomography (CT) scans of the head and cervical spine has markedly increased in patients with blunt minor trauma. The actual likelihood of a combined injury of head and cervical spine following a minor trauma is estimated to be low.

Purpose

To determine the incidence of such combined injuries in patients with a blunt minor trauma in order to estimate the need to derive improved diagnostic guidelines.

Material and Methods

A total of 1854 patients were retrospectively analyzed. All cases presented to the emergency department and in all patients combined CT scans of head and cervical spine were conducted. For the following analysis, only 1342 cases with assured blunt minor trauma were included. Data acquisition covered age, sex, and presence of a head injury as well as presence of a cervical spine injury or both.

Results

Of the 1342 cases, 46.9% were men. The mean age was 65.6 years. CT scans detected a head injury in 116 patients; of these, 70 cases showed an intracranial hemorrhage, 11 cases a skull fracture, and 35 cases an intracranial hemorrhage as well as a skull fracture. An injury of the cervical spine could be detected in 40 patients. A combined injury of the head and cervical spine could be found in one patient.

Conclusion

The paradigm of the coincidence of cranial and cervical spine injuries should be revised in patients with blunt minor trauma. Valid imaging decision algorithms are strongly needed to clinically detect high-risk patients in order to save limited resources.

Keywords

Spinal injuries craniocerebral trauma X-ray computed tomography (CT)emergency service hospital clinical decision-making

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bayless

Ray

. Incidence of cervical spine injuries in association with blunt head trauma. Am J Emerg Med 1989; 7: 139–142.

Hills

Deane

. Head injury and facial injury: is there an increased risk of cervical spine injury? J Trauma 1993; 34: 549–553; discussion 553–544.

Kocher

Meurer

Fazel

. National trends in use of computed tomography in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2011; 58: 452–462.

Holly

Kelly

Counelis

. Cervical spine trauma associated with moderate and severe head injury: incidence, risk factors, and injury characteristics. J Neurosurg 2002; 96: 285–291.

Iida

Tachibana

Kitahara

. Association of head trauma with cervical spine injury, spinal cord injury, or both. J Trauma 1999; 46: 450–452.

Mulligan

Friedman

Mahabir

. A nationwide review of the associations among cervical spine injuries, head injuries, and facial fractures. J Trauma 2010; 68: 587–592.

Hoffman

Schriger

Mower

. Low-risk criteria for cervical-spine radiography in blunt trauma: a prospective study. Ann Emerg Med 1992; 21: 1454–1460.

Stiell

Wells

Vandemheen

. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 2001; 286: 1841–1848.

Stiell

Clement

McKnight

. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2510–2518.

10.

Shrimpton

Hillier

Lewis

. National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 2006; 79: 968–980.

11.

Michael

Guyot

Darmody

. Coincidence of head and cervical spine injury. J Neurotrauma 1989; 6: 177–189.

12.

Piatt

Jr . Detected and overlooked cervical spine injury in comatose victims of trauma: report from the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcomes Study. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 5: 210–216.

13.

Tian

Guo

. Clinical characterization of comatose patients with cervical spine injury and traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2009; 67: 1305–1310.

14.

Stein

Burnett

Glick

. Indications for CT scanning in mild traumatic brain injury: A cost-effectiveness study. J Trauma 2006; 61: 558–566.

15.

Chan

Johnson

Beran-Maryott

. Measuring the impact of whole-body computed tomography on hospital length of stay in blunt trauma. Acad Radiol 2016; 23: 582–587.

16.

Lee

Kirschner

Pawa

. Computed tomography use in the adult emergency department of an academic urban hospital from 2001 to 2007. Ann Emerg Med 2010; 56: 591–596.

17.

Broder

Warshauer

. Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000-2005. Emerg Radiol 2006; 13: 25–30.

18.

Stiell

Clement

Grimshaw

. A prospective cluster-randomized trial to implement the Canadian CT Head Rule in emergency departments. CMAJ 2010; 182: 1527–1532.

19.

Macgregor

McKie

. CT or not CT–that is the question. Whether ‘tis better to evaluate clinically and x ray than to undertake a CT head scan!. Emerg Med J 2005; 22: 541–543.

20.

Kanzaria

Hoffman

Probst

. Emergency physician perceptions of medically unnecessary advanced diagnostic imaging. Acad Emerg Med 2015; 22: 390–398.

21.

Andruchow

Raja

Prevedello

. Variation in head computed tomography use for emergency department trauma patients and physician risk tolerance. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172: 660–661.

22.

Baker

Susman

Sheen

. A comparison of test-ordering choices of college physicians and emergency physicians for young adults with abdominal pain: influences and preferences for CT use. Emerg Radiol 2010; 17: 455–459.

23.

Holmes

Akkinepalli

. Computed tomography versus plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injury: a meta-analysis. J Trauma 2005; 58: 902–905.

24.

Lange

Penkar

Binder

. Are cervical spine radiograph examinations useful in patients with low clinical suspicion of cervical spine fracture? An experience with 254 cases. Emerg Radiol 2010; 17: 191–193.

25.

Coursey

Frush

. CT and radiation: What radiologists should know. Appl Radiol 2008; 37: 22–29.

26.

Worrall

Jama

Stiell

. Radiation doses to emergency department patients undergoing computed tomography. CJEM 2014; 16: 477–484.