Abstract
Background
The purpose of clinical audits performed in radiology units is to reduce the radiation dose of patients and staff and to implement evidence-based best practices.
Purpose
To describe auditor recommendations in three Finnish clinical audit rounds performed in 2002–2014, and to determine if auditor recommendations have had any impact on improving medical imaging practice.
Material and Methods
The retrospective observational study was performed in radiology units holding a radiation safety license issued by the Finnish Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority. The data comprised a systematic sample (n = 120) of auditor reports produced in three auditing rounds in these units during the years 2002–2014. The data were analyzed by descriptive methods and by using the Friedman two-way ANOVA test.
Results
The number of auditor recommendations given varied between clinical audit rounds and according to the type of imaging unit, as well as according to calculation method. Proportionally, the most recommendations in all three clinical audit rounds were given about defining and using quality assurance functions and about guidelines and practices for carrying out procedures involving radiation exposure. Demanding radiology units improved their practices more than basic imaging units towards the third round.
Conclusion
Auditor recommendations help to address the deficiencies in imaging practices. There is a need to develop uniform guidelines and to provide tutoring for clinical auditors in order to produce comparable clinical audit results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.