Abstract
Background
Abdominal diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been rapidly increasing during the last few years. For the evaluation of new DWI techniques, the development of suitable phantoms and quality assurance methods is important.
Purpose
To construct a body-diameter phantom for abdominal DWI and study the impact of different acquisition options on image quality.
Material and Methods
A phantom with a diameter of 31 cm and a volume of 26 L was constructed, containing four samples representing a clinically relevant range of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Measurements were carried out on 1.5T and 3.0T MRI systems using conventional echo-planar imaging (EPI), readout-segmented EPI, and zoomed EPI (3.0T) sequences. The effects of parallel imaging, coil intensity normalization, and patient-specific B1 shim (3.0T) were also examined. ADC values and signal-to-noise ratios of the samples were measured, and the level of artifacts was visually evaluated.
Results
The agreement of ADC values between different acquisition options was generally good, but higher values (by 0.07 × 10–3 mm2/s on the average) with readout-segmented EPI as well as ADC variations of approximately 0.1 × 10–3 mm2/s in slice direction were observed. The image artifacts were reduced by using patient-specific B1 shim, readout-segmented EPI, or zoomed EPI.
Conclusion
The body-sized phantom demonstrated well the expected image artifacts in DWI with large field of view. The use of patient-specific B1 shim, readout-segmented EPI, or zoomed EPI improved image quality of DWI in this study.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
