Preoperative planning of renal transplantation: a comparison of non-contrast-enhanced ultrasonography,computed tomography,and magnetic resonance angiography with observations from surgery

Abstract

Background

Many candidates for kidney transplantation need to undergo vessel examination before the transplantation procedure.

Purpose

To identify the optimal preoperative modality for the examination of vessel status without the use of contrast agents in kidney transplant candidates.

Material and Methods

Fifty-three consecutive patients were examined and 31 patients were transplanted. Ultrasonography (US), non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT), and non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCMRA) were compared using inspection during kidney transplantation (TX) as a reference standard. The sensitivity and specificity to severe arteriosclerotic changes and the accuracy were calculated. Kappa statistics were used to assess the agreement between TX and the different examination modalities, and McNemar’s test was used to test for significant differences.

Results

US had higher sensitivity (1.0) and better agreement with observations from surgery (k = 0.89) than both NCCT (sensitivity = 0.60; k = 0.72) and NCMRA (sensitivity = 0.20; k = 0.30). No significant difference was found between TX and US (P = 0.3173) or TX and NCCT (P = 0.1573), but there was a significant difference between TX and NCMRA (P = 0.0455). US was inconclusive in 20% of cases, and the internal iliac artery could not be visualized in 69% of cases.

Conclusion

Either US or NCCT can be used as the preferred preoperative imaging modality to examine vessel status before kidney transplantation, but a combination of the two is preferable. NCMRA should not be used as the sole imaging modality for preoperative imaging before kidney transplantation because of its low sensitivity in detecting severe arteriosclerotic disease without the presence of stenosis.

Keywords

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)computed tomography (CT)ultrasonography kidney transplantation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

The European Commission. Journalists workshop. Organ donation and transplantation. An invitation of the European commission. Facts and figures. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/blood_tissues_organs/docs/ev_20121009_facts_figures.pdf (accessed August 2013).

Aitken

Ramjug

Buist

. The prognostic significance of iliac vessel calcification in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 2012; 44: 2925–2931.

Orlic

Vukas

Drescik

. Vascular complications after 725 kidney transplantations during 3 decades. Transplant Proc 2003; 35: 1381–1384.

Subesinghe

Cherukuri

Ecuyer

. Who should have pelvic vessel imaging prior to renal transplantation? Clin Transplant 2011; 25: 97–103.

Knoll

Cockfield

Blydt-Hansen

. Canadian Society of Transplantation: consensus guidelines on eligibility for kidney transplantation. CMAJ 2005; 173: 1–25.

Kälble T, Alcaraz A, Budde K, et al. Guidelines on renal transplantation. Available at: http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/Renal%20Transplantation%202010.pdf (accessed August 2014).

Danish Health and Medicine Authority. Retningslinjer for undersøgelse af nyresyge patienter med gadoliniumholdige kontraststoffer ved MR-skanning. (In Danish). Available at: http://sundhedsstyrelsen.dk/publ/Publ2013/11nov/MRskanKontrastGdnyresgd2udg.pdf (accessed August 2014).

Katzberg

Barrett

. Risk of iodinated contrast material–induced nephropathy with intravenous administration. Radiology 2007; 243: 622–628.

Marckmann

Skov

Rossen

. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: suspected causative role of gadodiamide used for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17: 2359–2362.

10.

Grobner

. Gadolinium -a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21: 1104–1108.

11.

Danish National board of health. Guidelines for examinations og kidney diseased patients using contrast agents - with special focus on Gadolinium based contrast agents in MR-scanning. 2009. Available at: http://sundhedsstyrelsen.dk/publ/Publ2009/SUPL/Nyresyge/Kontraststof_anvendelse_nyresyre.pdf (accessed August 2014).

12.

Blankholm

Ginnerup-Pedersen

Stausbøl-Grøn

. Non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography techniques in candidates for kidney transplantation: A comparative study. Radiography 2013; 19: 212–217.

13.

Blankholm

Ringgaard

. Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: techniques and applications. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2012; 10: 75–88.

14.

Wheaton

Miyazaki

. Non-contrast enhanced MR angiography: Physical principles. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36: 286–304.

15.

Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. 1st ed. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1991.

16.

Burgos

Pascual

Marcen

. The role of imaging techniques in renal transplantation. World J Urol 2004; 22: 399–404.

17.

Aitken

Ramjug

Buist

. The prognostic significance of iliac vessel calcification in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 2012; 44: 2925–2931.

18.

Subesinghe

Cherukuri

Ecuyer

. Who should have pelvic vessel imaging prior to renal transplantation? Clin Transplant 2011; 25: 97–103.

19.

Hoftman

Prunean

Dhillon

. Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) is a useful tool for evaluation of perioperative cardiac morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation 2013; 96: 639–643.

20.

Scandling

. Kidney transplant candidate evaluation. Semin Dial 2005; 18: 487–494.

21.

DeLoach

Joffe

Mai

. Aortic calcification predicts cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24: 1314–1319.