Detectability of T1a lung cancer on digital chest radiographs: an observer-performance comparison among 2-megapixel general-purpose,2-megapixel medical-purpose,and 3-megapixel medical-purpose liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors

Abstract

Background

There has been no comparison of detectability of small lung cancer between general and medical LCD monitors or no comparison of detectability of small lung cancer between solid and part-solid nodules.

Purpose

To compare the detectabilities of T1a lung cancer on chest radiographs on three LCD monitor types: 2-megapixel (MP) for general purpose (General), 2-MP for medical purpose (Medical), and 3-MP-Medical.

Material and Methods

Radiographs from forty patients with T1aN0M0 primary lung cancer (27 solid nodules, 13 part-solid nodules) and 60 patients with no abnormalities on both chest X-ray and computed tomography (CT) were consecutively collected. Five readers assessed 100 cases for each monitor. The observations were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. A jackknife method was used for statistical analysis. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The average AUC for all T1a lung cancer nodule detection using the 2-MP-General, 2-MP-Medical, and 3-MP-Medical LCD monitors were 0.86, 0.89, and 0.89, respectively; there were no significant differences among them. The average AUC for part-solid nodule detection using a 2-MP-General, 2-MP-Medical, and 3-MP-Medical LCD monitors were 0.77, 0.86, and 0.89, respectively. There were significant differences between the 2-MP-General and 2-MP-Medical LCD monitors (P = 0.043) and between the 2-MP-General and 3-MP-Medical LCD monitors (P = 0.027). There was no significant difference between the 2-MP-Medical and 3-MP-Medical LCD monitors. The average AUC for solid nodule detection using a 2-MP-General, 2-MP-Medical, and 3-MP-Medical LCD monitors were 0.90, 0.90, and 0.88, respectively; there were no significant differences among them. The mean AUC values for all and part-solid nodules of the low-experienced readers were significantly lower than those of the high-experienced readers with the 2 M-GP color LCD monitor (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Detectability of part-solid nodules using a general-purpose LCD monitor was significantly lower than those using medical-purpose LCD monitors.

Keywords

Liquid crystal observer performance pulmonary nodule digital radiography lung cancer

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Badano

. AAPM/RSNA tutorial on equipment selection: PACS equipment overview. Radiographics 2004; 24: 879–889.

Samei

Badano

Chakraborty

. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG 18 report. Med Phys 2005; 32: 1205–1225.

Flieder

Port

Korst

. Tumor size is a determinant of stage distribution in t1 non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 2005; 128: 2304–2308.

Hirsch

Franklin

Gazdar

. Early detection of lung cancer: clinical perspectives of recent advances in biology and radiology. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7: 5–22.

Aoki

Tomoda

Watanabe

. Peripheral lung adenocarcinoma: correlation of thin-section CT findings with histologic prognostic factors and survival. Radiology 2001; 220: 803–809.

Tsubamoto

Kuriyama

Kido

. Detection of lung cancer on chest radiographs: analysis on the basis of size and extent of ground-glass opacity at thin-section CT. Radiology 2002; 224: 139–144.

Gondoy

MCB

Naidich

. Subsolid pulmonary nodules and the spectrum of peripheral adenocarcinomas of the lung: recommended interim guidelines for assessment and management. Radiology 2009; 253: 606–622.

Usami

Ikeda

Ishigaki

. The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 726–732.

Park

Lee

Goo

. Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors. Eur J Radiol 2008; 66: 13–18.

10.

Hwang

Seo

Choi

. Liquid-crystal display monitors and cathode-ray tube monitors: a comparison of observer performance in the detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules. Korean J Radiol 2003; 4: 153–156.

11.

Yin

Guo

Sha

. Influence of liquid crystal displays (LCDs) with different resolutions on the detection of pulmonary nodules: An observer performance study. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80: e153–e156.

12.

Metz

. ROC analysis in medical imaging: a tutorial review of the literature. Radiol Phys Technol 2008; 1: 2–12.

13.

Metz

. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989; 24: 234–245.

14.

Dorfman

Berbaum

Metz

. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992; 27: 723–731.

15.

Henschke

Yankelevitz

Mirtcheva

. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 1053–1057.

16.

Yokose

Suzuki

Nagai

. Favorable and unfavorable morphological prognostic factors in peripheral adenocarcinoma of the lung 3cm or less in diameter. Lung Cancer 2000; 29: 179–188.

17.

Samei E, Badano A, Chakraborty D, et al. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems, report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 18. AAPM On-Line Report. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing, 2005; No. 03. Available at: http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/ (accessed 16 December 2013).

18.

Goo

Choi

. Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs. Radiology 2004; 232: 762–766.

19.

Herron

Bender

Campbell

. Effects of luminance and resolution on observer performance with chest radiographs. Radiology 2000; 215: 169–174.