Low-dose multidetector computed tomography of the cervical spine: optimization of iterative reconstruction strength levels

Abstract

Background

Iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques reduce image noise in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) imaging. They can therefore be used to reduce radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality nearly constant. However, CT manufacturers offer several strength levels of IR to choose from.

Purpose

To determine the optimal strength level of IR in low-dose MDCT of the cervical spine.

Material and Methods

Thirty consecutive patients investigated by low-dose cervical spine MDCT were prospectively studied. Raw data were reconstructed using filtered back-projection and sinogram-affirmed IR (SAFIRE, strength levels 1 to 5) techniques. Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured at C3–C4 and C6–C7 levels. Two radiologists independently and blindly evaluated various anatomical structures (both dense and soft tissues) using a 4-point scale. They also rated the overall diagnostic image quality using a 10-point scale.

Results

As IR strength levels increased, image noise decreased linearly, while SNR and CNR both increased linearly at C3–C4 and C6–C7 levels (P < 0.001). For the intervertebral discs, the content of neural foramina and dural sac, and for the ligaments, subjective image quality scores increased linearly with increasing IR strength level (P ≤ 0.03). Conversely, for the soft tissues and trabecular bone, the scores decreased linearly with increasing IR strength level (P < 0.001). Finally, the overall diagnostic image quality scores increased linearly with increasing IR strength level (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The optimal strength level of IR in low-dose cervical spine MDCT depends on the anatomical structure to be analyzed. For the intervertebral discs and the content of neural foramina, high strength levels of IR are recommended.

Keywords

Multidetector computed tomography filtered back-projection iterative reconstruction image quality radiation dose cervical spine

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Munera

Rivas

Nunez

Jr . Imaging evaluation of adult spinal injuries: emphasis on multidetector CT in cervical spine trauma. Radiology 2012; 263: 645–660.

Van Goethem

Maes

Ozsarlak

. Imaging in spinal trauma. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 582–590.

Douglas-Akinwande

Rydberg

Shah

. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MDCT and MRI for identifying the severity and cause of neural foraminal stenosis in cervical radiculopathy: a prospective study. Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 55–61.

Freund

Sartor

. Degenerative spine disorders in the context of clinical findings. Eur J Radiol 2006; 58: 15–26.

Tins

. Technical aspects of CT imaging of the spine. Insights Imaging 2010; 1: 349–359.

Biswas

Bible

Bohan

. Radiation exposure from musculoskeletal computerized tomographic scans. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 1882–1889.

Lee

Chhem

. Impact of new technologies on dose reduction in CT. Eur J Radiol 2010; 76: 28–35.

Fleischmann

Boas

. Computed tomography–old ideas and new technology. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 510–517.

Willemink

de Jong

Leiner

. Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography Part 1: Technical principles. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 1623–1631.

10.

Gervaise

Osemont

Lecocq

. CT image quality improvement using Adaptative Iterative Dose Reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 295–301.

11.

Becce

Ben Salah

Verdun

. Computed tomography of the cervical spine: comparison of image quality between a standard-dose and a low-dose protocol using filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction. Skeletal Radiol 2013; 42: 937–945.

12.

Silva

Lawder

Hara

. Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 191–199.

13.

Moscariello

Takx

Schoepf

. Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique-comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 2130–2138.

14.

Winklehner

Karlo

Puippe

. Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 2521–2526.

15.

Deak

Smal

Kalender

. Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 2010; 257: 158–166.

16.

Willemink

Leiner

de Jong

. Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography Part 2: Initial results in dose reduction and image quality. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 1632–1642.

17.

Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, et al. European guidelines for multislice computed tomography. See http://www.msct.eu/CT_Quality_Criteria.html.

18.

American College of Radiology - American Society of Neuroradiology - American Society of Spine Radiology - Society for Pediatric Radiology. Practice guideline for the performance of computed tomography (CT) of the spine. See http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Standards-Guidelines/Practice-Guidelines-by-Modality/CT.

19.

Société Française de Radiologie. Guide pratique à l’usage des médecins radiologues pour l’évaluation de leurs pratiques professionnelles. Société Française de Radiologie, 2009: 282–283 and 451–452.

20.

Miéville

Gudinchet

Brunelle

. Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments – A phantom approach. Phys Med 2013; 29: 99–110.

21.

Singh

Kalra

Gilman

. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology 2011; 259: 565–573.

22.

Miéville

Gudinchet

Rizzo

. Paediatric cardiac CT examinations: impact of the iterative reconstruction method ASIR on image quality–preliminary findings. Pediatr Radiol 2011; 41: 1154–1164.

23.

Rampado

Bossi

Garabello

. Characterization of a computed tomography iterative reconstruction algorithm by image quality evaluations with an anthropomorphic phantom. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 3172–3177.

24.

Rapalino

Kamalian

. Cranial CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: improved image quality with concomitant radiation dose reduction. Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: 609–615.

25.

Mulkens

Marchal

Daineffe

. Comparison of low-dose with standard-dose multidetector CT in cervical spine trauma. Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 1444–1450.

26.

Weidemann

Stamm

Galanski

. Comparison of the image quality of various fixed and dose modulated protocols for soft tissue neck CT on a GE Lightspeed scanner. Eur J Radiol 2009; 69: 473–477.

27.

Gnannt

Winklehner

Goetti

. Low kilovoltage CT of the neck with 70 kVp: comparison with a standard protocol. Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: 1014–1019.

28.

Hoang

Yoshizumi

Nguyen

. Variation in tube voltage for adult neck MDCT: effect on radiation dose and image quality. Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: 621–627.

29.

von Falck

Hartung

Berndzen

. Optimization of low-contrast detectability in thin-collimated modern multidetector CT using an interactive sliding-thin-slab averaging algorithm. Invest Radiol 2008; 43: 229–235.

30.

von Falck

Galanski

Shin

. Informatics in radiology: sliding-thin-slab averaging for improved depiction of low-contrast lesions with radiation dose savings at thin-section CT. Radiographics 2010; 30: 317–326.