Abstract
This paper uses two discourses—Kuhn's (1962) formulation of the paradigm and cognitive theory (specifically that of social schemas)—to deconstruct the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and National Transportation Safely Board's (NTSB's) investigation info the 1996 TWA Flight 800 disaster. Following the disaster, concerns were expressed in the media that the FBI and NTSB might not he approaching the investigation with an entirely open mind. Certainly a number of statements were made by FBI and NTSB managers that seemed to indicate a preferred conclusion as to the cause(s) of the disaster. This paper uses social schema theory and Kuhn's discourse on the paradigm to ascertain, on the basis of widely reported statements, the degree to which FBI and NTSB investigators stated a preference expressed either overtly in statements, or covertly through investigative method—in the matter of causation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
