This paper presents an exploratory study of woman battering in the Grand Forks, North Dakota flood of April 1997. Based on my qualitative research of women's experiences in this flood, I present two case studies of battered women to enhance understanding of what intimate partner violence means to women in the face of a natural disaster. The case studies illustrate how battered women make sense of their situations and how factors such as class and disability play a role in how women experience domestic violence. The case studies also show why services for battered women, such as emergency shelters and crisis counseling, are crucial during a disaster period. Even though we do not know if domestic violence rates increase in a. disaster, we do have evidence that the demand for domestic violence services increases during disaster times. In light of this, I argue that there is a need to prepare for that situation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamMargaret. 1996. “Ethnicity, Gender, and Marital Violence.” Gender and Society9: 450–468.
2.
AlwayJoan, BelgraveLinda Liska, and KennethJ. Smith. 1998. “Back to Normal: Gender and Disaster.” Symbolic Interaction21: 175–195.
3.
BelknapJoanne. 1995. “Law Enforcement Officers’ Attitudes about the Appropriate Responses to Woman Battering.” International Review of Victimology4: 47–62.
4.
BelknapJoanne. 1996. The Invisible Woman: Gender, Crime, and Justice.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5.
ChenowethLesley. 1996. “Violence and Women With Disabilities.” Violence Against Women 2: 391–411.
6.
CollinsPatricia Hill. 1993. “Toward a New Vision: Race, Class, and Gender as Categories of Analysis and Connection.” Race, Sex, & Class1: 25–45.
7.
DavisKaren. 1998. “Impact of the 1997 Red River Valley Flood on Marital Relationships.” Masters Thesis, University of North Dakota.
8.
DobashR. Emerson, and DobashRussell. 1979. Violence Against Wives.New York: The Free Press.
9.
DobsonNarelle. 1993. “From Under the Mud-Pack: Women and the Charleville Floods.” Symposium: Women in Emergencies and Disasters.Brisbane, Queensland: Queensland Bureau of Emergency Services.
10.
DuttonDonald G.1988. The Domestic Assault of Women.Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
11.
DuttonMary Ann. 1996. “Battered Women's Strategic Response to Violence: The Role of Context.” Pp. 105–124 in Future Interventions with Battered Women and their Families, edited by EdlesonJ., EisikovitsZ.. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
12.
EnarsonElaine. 1998. “Battered Women in Disaster: A Case Study of Gendered Vulnerability.” Paper presented at the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, August 1998.
13.
EnarsonElaine, MorrowBetty Hearn. 1997. “A Gendered Perspective: The Voices of Women.” Pp. 116–140 in Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters, edited by lis PeacockWalter Gil, MorrowBetty Hearn, and GladwinHugh. New York: Routledge.
14.
ErezEdna, and BelknapJoanne. 1998. “In Their Own Words: Battered Women's Assessment of the Criminal Processing System's Responses.” Violence and Victims13: 3–20.
15.
FerraroKathleen J., and JohnsonJohn M.. 1983. “How Women Fxperience Battering
16.
GellesRichard J.1997. Intimate Violence in Families.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
17.
GoldsteinHerman. 1977. Policing a Free Society.Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Publishing Co.
18.
GreenBonnie. 1993. “Mental Health and Disaster: Research Review.” Report for the National Institute for Mental Health.
19.
HoneycombeBeth. 1993. “Special Needs of Women in Emergency Situations.” Symposium: Women in Emergencies and Disasters.Brisbane, Queensland Queensland Bureau of Emergency Services.
20.
KantorGlenda K., and StrausMurray A.. 1987. “The ‘Drunken Bum’ Theory of Wife Beating.” Social Problems34: 213–230.
21.
KetteridgeAnne-Michelle, and FordhamMaureen. 1998. “Flood Evacuation in Two Communities in Scotland: Lessons from European Research.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters16: 119–143.
22.
LevinsonDavid. 1981. “Physical Punishment of children and wifebeating in cross-cultural perspective.” Child Abuse & Neglect: The International Journal5: 193–196.
23.
MillerSusan L.1989. “Unintended Side Effects of Pro-arrest Policies and their Race and Class Implications for Battered Women.” Criminal Justice Policy Review3: 299–317.
24.
MorrowBetty Hearn. 1997. “Stretching the Bonds: The Families of Andrew.” Pp. 141–170 in Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters, edited by PeacockWalter Gillis, MorrowBetty Hearn, and GladwinHugh. New York: Routledge.
25.
MorrowBetty Hearn, and EnarsonElaine. 1996. “Hurricane Andrew Through Women's Eyes: Issues and Recommendations.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters14: 5–22.
26.
OkunLewis. 1986. Woman Abuse: Facts Replacing Myths.Albany: State University of New York Press.
27.
PleckElizabeth. 1987. Domestic Tyranny: The Making of American Social Policy against Family Violence from Colonial Times to the Present.New York: Oxford.
28.
QuarantelliE. L.1994. “Looting and Antisocial Behavior in Disasters.” Newark, DE: Paper #205, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
29.
ReinharzShulamit. 1992. Feminist Methods in Social Research.New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
SchwartzMartin. 1988. “Ain't got no class: Universal Risk Theories of Battering.” Contemporary Crises12: 373–392.
31.
SobseyR.1994. Violence in the Lives of People with Disabilities: The End of Silent Acceptance?Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
32.
StakeRobert. 1994. “Case Studies.” Pp. 236–247 in Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by DenzinNorman, and LincolnYvonneThousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
33.
ThomsonRosemarie G.1994. “Redrawing the Boundaries of Feminist Disability Studies.” Feminist Studies20: 583–595.
34.
TongRosemarie. 1984. Women, Sex, and the Law.Totawa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
35.
WalkerLenore E.1979. The Battered Woman.New York: Harper & Row.
36.
WilsonJennifer, PhillipsBrenda D., and NealDavid M.. 1998. “Domestic Violence after Disaster.” Pp. 115–122 in The Gendered Terrain of Disaster: Through Women's Eyes, edited by EnarsonElane, and MorrowBetty HearnWestport, CT: Praeger.
37.
YinRobert. 1984. Case Study Research.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
