The “cry wolf” hypothesis argues that individuals who have experienced predictions of disasters that do not materialize will discount the validity of subsequent disaster warnings. This belief in the false alarm effect is widely mentioned in the disaster literature, and anecdotal material appears to support the validity of the hypothesis. This study of a false earthquake warning supports experimental findings indicating that cancellation of a disaster waiving leads to a false alarm effect. Following cancellation of the threat by the nonappearance of the predicted earthquake, 46.7 percent of the panel respondents indicated that they would pay less attention whereas only 16.7 percent said that they would pay more attention to a future earthquake prediction. The panel data also suggest that the mass media were substantial contributors to the. observed false alarm effect, while at the same time the media escaped blame for their contributions to the problem.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakerEarl J.1993. “Empirical Studies of Public Response to Tomado and Hurricane Warnings in the United Slates.” Pp. 65–73 in Prediction and Perception of Natural Hazards, edited by NemecJ., NiggJ.M., SiccardiF., Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2.
BaumAndrew, FlemingRaymond, and SingerJerome E.. 1983. “Coping with Victimization by Technological Disaster.” Journal of Social Issues39: 117–138.
3.
BerelsonBernard, and SteinerGary A.. 1964. Human Behavior: An Inventory of Scientific Findings.New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
4.
BrcznitzShlomo. 1984. Cry Wolf: The Psychology of False Alarms.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5.
BurgerJerry M., and PalmerMichele L.. 1992. “Changes in and Generalization of Unrealistic Optimism Following Experiences with Stressful Events: Reactions to the 1989 California Earthquake.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin18: 39–43.
6.
CohenSheldon. 1985. “Cognitive Processes as Determinants of Environmental Stress.” Issues in Mental Health Nursing7: 65–81.
7.
ColemanCynthia-Lou. 1993. “The Influence of Mass Media and Interpersonal Communication on Societal and Personal Risk Judgments.” Communication Research20: 611–628.
8.
DavenportA. G.1993. “The Impact of Structural Damage Due to Hurricanes and the Prospects for Disaster Reduction.” Pp. 13–21 in Prediction and Perception of Natural Hazards, edited by NemecJ., NiggJ. M., SiecardiF.. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9.
DavisJames F.1990. The Ad Hoc Working Group on the December 2–3, 1990. Earthquake Prediction: Evaluation of the December 2–3, 1990, New Madrid Seismic Zone Prediction.Sacramento: Report of the State of California, Division of Mines and Geology.
10.
De MarchiBruna. 1993. “Effective Communication Between the Scientific Community and the Media.” Pp. 183–191 in Prediction and Perception of Natural Hazards, edited by NemecJ., NiggJ. M., SiccardiF.. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11.
Economist.1997. “Hurricanes: A Log in the Wind.” (July 19): 71.
12.
FarleyJohn E., BarlowHugh D., FinkelsteinMarvin S., and RileyLarry Larry. 1993. “Earthquake Hysteria, Before and After: A Survey and Follow-up on Public Rresponse to the Browning Forecast.” International. Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters11: 305–321.
13.
FiskeSusan T., and TaylorShelley E.. 1991. Social Cognition.Second Edition.New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
FlemingRaymond, BaumAndrew, GisrielMartha M., and GatchellRobert J.. 1982. “Mediating Influences of Social Support on Stress at Three Miles Island.” Journal of Human Stress (September): 14–22.
15.
FolkmanSusan. 1984. “Personal Control and Stress and Coping Processes: A Theoretical Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46: 839–852.
16.
GaoDandan. 1991. Content Analysis on Earthquake Coverage in Two Local Newspapers: Southern Illinois and Southeast Missourian.Carbondale, IL: unpublished manuscript, School of Journalism, Southern Illinois University.
17.
GibsonRhonda, and ZillmanDolf. 1993. “The Impact of Quotations in News Reports on Issue Perception.” Journalism Quarterly70: 793–800.
18.
GibsonRhonda, and ZillmanDolf. 1994. “Exaggerated Versus Representative Exemplification in News Reports.” Communication Research21: 603–624.
19.
GoriPaula. 1993. “The Social Dynamics of a False Earthquake Prediction and the Response by the Public Sector.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America83: 963–980.
20.
HallmanWilliam K., and WandersmanAbraham. 1992. “Attribution of Responsibility and Individual and Collective Coping with Environmental Threats.” Journal of Social Issues48: 101–118.
21.
HornigSusanna, WaltersLynne Masel, and inJulie Tempi1991. “Voices in the News: Newspaper Coverage of Hurricane Hugo and the Loma Prieta Earthquake.” Newspaper Research Journal12: 32–45.
22.
HudsonBradford B.1954. “Anxiety in Response to the Unfamiliar.” Journal of Social Issues10: 53–60.
23.
JaffeGreg. 1998. “Under the Radar: If the Weather Seems Worse, Don't Pin All the Blame on El Nino.” The Wall Street Journal (May 5): A1.
24.
Johnson-CarteeKaren S., GrahamBryan A., and FosterDeborah. 1993. “Siting a Hazardous Waste Incinerator: Newspaper Risk Communication and Public Opinion.” Newspaper Research Journal13(4) and 14(1): 60–72.
25.
JohnstonArchibald C., and NavaSusan J.. 1985. “Recurrence Rates and Probability Estimates for the New Madrid Seismic Zone.” Journal of Geophysical Research90: 6737–6753.
26.
KillianLewis M.1954, Evacnotion of Panama City before Hurricane Florence.Washington, D.C.: Committee on Disaster Studies, National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council.
27.
KleckaWilliam R.1980. Discriminant Analysis.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28.
LedinghamJohn A., and WaltersLynne Masel. 1985. “Written on the Wind: The Mass Media and Hurricane Alicia.” Newspaper Research Journal6: 50–58.
29.
LehmanDamn R., and TaylorShelley E.. 1987. “Date with an Earthquake: Coping with a Probable, Unpredictable Disaster.” Personality and Social-Psychology Bulletin13: 546–555.
30.
LevyMatthys, and SalvadoriMario. 1995. Why the Earth Quakes.New York: W. W. Norton and Company, Inc.
31.
LindellMichael K., and PerryRonald W.. 1993. “Risk Area Residents’ Changing Perceptions of Volcano Hazard at Mt. St. Helens.” Pp. 159–166 in Prediction and Perception of Natural Hazards, edited by NemecJ., NiggJ. M., SiccardiF.. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
LombardiMarco. 1993. “Ideas for a Global Model of Communication and IDNDR Potential.” Pp. 193–198 in Prediction and Perception of Natural Hazards, edited by NemecJ., NiggJ. M., SiccardiF.. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34.
MiletiDennis S.1993. “Communicating Public Earthquake Risk Information.” Pp. 143–152 in Prediction and Perception of Natural Hazards, edited by NemecJ., NiggJ. M., SiccardiF.. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
35.
MiletiDennis S., DarlingtonJoAnne D., FitzpatrickColleen, and O'BrienPaul W.. 1993. Communicating Earthquake Risk: Societal Response to Revised Probabilities in the Bay Area.Fort Collins, CO: Hazards Assessment Laboratory and Department of Sociology, Colorado State University.
36.
MiletiDennis S., and FitzpatrickColleen. 1993. The Great Earthquake Experiment: Risk Communication and Public Action.Boulder: Westview Press.
37.
MitchellJames K.1993. “Natural Hazard Prediction and Responses in Very Large Cities.” Pp. 29–37 in Prediction and Perception of Natural Hazards, edited by NemecJ., NiggJ. M., SiccardiF.. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
38.
MulilusJohn Paul, and LippaRichard. 1990. “Behavioral Change in Earthquake Preparedness Due to Negative Threat Appeals: A Test of Protection Motivation Theory.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology20: 619–638.
39.
NiggJoanne. 1987. “Factors Affecting Earthquake Threat Awareness and Response.” Pp. 283–292 in Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Proceedings. Volume 3. Wairakei, New Zealand: New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering.
40.
NorusisMarija J.1988. “Predicting Cure and Credit: Discriminant Analysis.” SPSS-X Advanced Statistics Guide.Second Edition.Chicago: SPSS, Inc.
41.
NorusisMarija J.1994. “Discriminant Analysis.” SPSS Professional Statistics 6.1. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.
42.
PorfirievBoris N.1993. “Uncertainties in Natural Hazards Prediction and its Effect on User Communities Perception: Soviet Union Case Study.” Pp. 49–53 in Prediction and Perception of Natural Hazards, edited by NemecJ., NiggJ. M., SiccardiF.. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
43.
QuaranrelliE. L.1989. “The Social Science Study of Disasters and Mass Communication.” Pp. 1–19 in Bad Tidings: Communication and Catastrophe, edited by WaltersLynne Masel, WilkinsLee, and WaltersTimHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
44.
QuaranrelliE. L.1993. “The Different Worlds of Science and Mass Communication: Implications for Information Flow from the Former to the Latter.” Pp. 175–182 in Prediction and Perception of Natural Hazards edited by NemecJ., NiggJ.M., SiccardiF.. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
45.
RobinsonJohn, and LevyMark R.. 1986. “Interpersonal Communication and News Comprehension.” Public Opinion Quarterly50: 160–175.
46.
RussellLisa A., GoltzJames D., and BourqueLinda B.. 1995. “Preparedness and Hazard Mitigation Actions Before and After Two Earthquakes.” Environment and Behavior27: 744–770.
47.
ScheierMichael F., WeintraubJagdish Kumari, and CarverCharles S.. 1986. “Coping with Stress: Divergent Strategies of Optimists and Pessimists.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51: 1257–1264.
48.
SchwartzMarian. 1982. “Repetition and Rated Truth Value of Statements.” American Journal of Psychology95: 393–407.
49.
ShortJames F.Jr.1984. “The Social Fabric at Risk: Toward the Social Transformation of Risk Analysis.” American Sociological Review49: 711–725.
50.
ShowalterPamela Sands. 1993. “Prognostication of Doom: An Earthquake Prediction's Effect on Four Small Communities.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters11: 279–292.
51.
SlovicPaul. 1986. “Informing and Educating the Public About Risk.” Risk Analysis6: 403–415.
52.
StallingsRobert A.1995. Promoting Risk; Constructing the Earthquake Threat.New York: Aldine de Gruyer.
53.
TaylorShelley E.1991. “Asymmetrical Effects of Positive and Negative Events: The Mobilization-Minimization Hypothesis.” Psychological Bulletin110: 67–85.
54.
ThompsonSuzanne C, Sobolew-ShubinAlexandria, GalbraithMichael E., SchwankovskyLenore, and CurzenDana. 1993. “Maintaining Perceptions of Control: Finding Perceived Control in Low-Control Circumstances.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64: 293–304.
55.
TonnBruce E., TravisCheryl B., GoeltzRichard T., and PhillippiRaymond H.. 1990. “Knowledge-Based Reprcsentations of Risk Beliefs.” Risk Analysis10: 169–184.
56.
TurnerRalph H., NiggJoanne, and PazDenise Heller. 1986. Waiting for Disaster: Earthquake Watch in California.Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
57.
WetzelChristopher G., HettingerEd, McMillenRobert, RayburnMunroe, and NixAndrew. 1991. “When a Quack Predicts a Quake: College Students Reactions to a Disconfirmed Prediction.” Edwardsville, IL: paper presented at Conference on Public and Media Response to Earthquake Forecasts, Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville.
