We discuss earlier observations and meetings which led us to propose that a special issue of the journal be published on theoretical aspects of disasters, especially on how the term “disaster” ought to be conceptualized. Our basic position is the field cannot develop well as a research enterprise unless there is greater clarity and more consensus about the central concept in the field. We particularly note that there are both old and new classification problems that need to be addressed in asking: What is a disaster?
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartonAllen. 1963. Social Organization Under Stress.Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
2.
BartonAllen. 1969. Communities in Disasters: A Sociological Analysis of Collective Stress Situations.Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
3.
CarrLowell J.1932. “Disaster and the Sequence-Pattern Concept of Social Change.” American Journal of Sociology38: 207–218.
4.
ClausenL., ConlonP., JagerW., MetreveliS.. 1978. “New Aspects of the Sociology of Disaster: A Theoretical Note.” Mass Emergencies3: 61–65.
5.
DombrowskyWolf. 1981. Another Step Toward a Social Theory of Disaster. Preliminary Paper #70. Newark, Delaware: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
6.
DynesRussell R.1993. Conceptualizing Disaster in Ways Productive for Social Science Disaster Research. Unpublished Paper. Newark, Delaware: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
7.
DynesRussell R.1994. “Conceptualization del Desastre en Formas Produtivas para la Investigacion en Ciencias Sociales.” Pp. 127–154 in Al Norte Del Rio Grande Ciencias Sociales, Desasires: Una Perspectiva Norteamerican, edited by LavellAllanColumbia: LA RED (in Spanish).
8.
EndlemanRobert. 1952. An Approach to the Study of Disasters. Unpublished paper.
9.
FritzCharles. 1961. “Disasters.” Pp. 651–694 in Social Problems, edited by MertonR., NisbetR.. New York: Harcourt Brace.
10.
FritzCharles, and WilliamsHarry. 1957. “The Human Being in Disasters: A Research Perspective.” Annals309: 42–51.
11.
KillianLewis. 1954. “Some Accomplishments and Some Needs in Disaster Study.” Journal of Social Issues10: 66–72.
12.
KrepsGary. 1978. “The Organization of Disaster Response: Some Fundamental Theoretical Issues.” Pp. 66–85 in Disasters: Theory and Research, edited by QuarantelliE. L.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
KrepsGary. 1983. “The Organization of Disaster Response: Core Concepts and Processes.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters1: 439–465.
14.
KrepsGary. 1984. “Sociological Inquiry and Disaster Research.” Annual Review of Sociology10: 309–330.
15.
MitchellJ.1990. “Human Dimensions of Environmental Hazards: Complexity, Disparity and the Search for Guidance.” Pp. 131–178 in Nothing to Fear: Risks and Hazards in American Society, edited by KirbyAndrewTucson, Arizona: University of Arizona Press.
16.
MitchellJ.1993. “Recent Developments in Hazards Research: A Geographer's Perspective.” Pp. 43–62 in Proceedings of the United States-Former Soviet Union Seminar on Social Science Research on Mitigation for and Recovery from Disasters and Large Scale Hazards, edited by QuarantelliE. L., and PopovKonstantin. Newark, Delaware: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
17.
MitroffI., and KilmannR. H.. 1984. Corporate Tragedies, New York: Praeger.
18.
MooreHarry. 1956. “Toward a Theory of Disaster.” American Sociological Review21: 734–737.
19.
Oliver-SmithAnthony. 1993. “Anthropological Perspectives in Disaster Research.” Pp. 94–117 in Proceedings of the United States-Former Soviet Union Seminar on Social Science Research on Mitigation for and Recovery from Disasters and Large Scale Hazards, edited by QuarantelliE. L., and PopovKonstantin. Newark, Delaware: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
20.
PelandaCarlo. 1982. Disasters and Order: Theoretical Problems in Disaster Research.Gorizia, Italy: Institute of International Sociology.
21.
PowellI., RaynerJ., FinesingerJ.. 1952. “Responses to Disaster in American Cultural Groups.” Pp. 174–193 in Symposium on Stress.Washington, D.C.: Army Medical Service Graduate School.
22.
QuarantelliE. L.1966. “Organization Under Stress.” Pp. 3–19 in Symposium on Emergency Operations, edited by BrictsonRobertSanta Monica, California: System Development Corporation.
23.
QuarantelliE. L.1977. “Social Aspects of Disaster and Their Relevance to Pre-Disaster Planning.” Disasters1: 98–107.
24.
QuarantelliE. L.1982. “What is a Disaster? An Agent Specific or an all Disaster Spectrum Approach to Socio-Behavioral Aspects of Earthquakes?” Pp. 453–478 in Social and Economic Aspects of Earthquakes, edited by JonesB. G., TomazevicM.. Ithaca, New York: Program in Urban and Regional Studies, Cornell University.
25.
QuarantelliE. L.1985a. “An Assessment of Conflicting Views on Mental Health: The Consequences of Traumatic Events.” Pp. 173–215 in Trauma and Its Wake: The Treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, edited by FiqleyC.. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
26.
QuarantelliE. L.1985b. “What is a Disaster? The Need for Clarification in Definition and Conceptualization in Research.” Pp. 41–73 in Disasters and Mental Health: Selected Contemporary Perspectives, edited by SowderBarbaraWashington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
27.
QuarantelliE. L.1987a. “Disaster Studies: An Analysis of the Social Historical Factors Affecting the Development of Research in the Area.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters5: 285–310.
28.
QuarantelliE. L.1987b. “What Should We Study? Questions and Suggestions for Researchers about the Concept of Disaster.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters5: 7–32.
29.
QuarantelliE. L.1989a. “Conceptualizing Disasters from a Sociological Perspective.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters7: 243–251.
30.
QuarantelliE. L.1989b. “Panel: What Should We Be Studying?” Pp. 96–113 in Proceedings Italy-United States Seminar: Preparations for Responses to and Recovery from Major Community Disasters, edited by QuarantelliE. L., and PelandaCarlo. Newark, Delaware: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
31.
QuarantelliE. L.1992. “The Case for a Generic Rather than Agent Specific Approach to Disaster.” Disaster Management4: 191–196.
32.
QuarantelliE. L.1993a. “Community Crises: An Exploratory Comparison of the Characteristics and Consequences of Disasters and Riots.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management1: 67–78.
33.
QuarantelliE. L.1993b. Disasters and Catastrophes: Their Conditions in and Consequences for Social Development. Preliminary Paper #197. Newark, Delaware: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
34.
QuarantelliE. L.1994. “Disaster Studies: The Consequences of the Historical Use of a Sociological Approach in the Development of Research.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters12: 25–49.
35.
QuarantelliE. L.1995. Draft of a Sociological Disaster Research Agenda for the Future: Theoretical, Methodological and Empirical Issues. Unpublished paper.
36.
RosenthalU., HartP. ‘T, and CharlesM.. 1989a. “The World of Crises and Crisis Management.” Pp. 3–33 in Coping With Crises. The Management of Disasters Riots and Terrorism, edited by RosenthalU., CharlesM., and HartP. ‘T. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.
37.
RosenthalU., CharlesM., HartP. ‘T, KouzminA., JarmanA.. 1989b. “From Case Studies to Theory and Recommendations. A Concluding Analysis.” Pp. 436–472 in Coping With Crises, The Management of Disasters, Riots and Terrorism, edited by RosenthalU., CharlesM., and HartP. ‘T. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.
38.
SchorrJohn. 1987. “Some Contributions German Katastophensoziologie Can Make to the Sociology of Disaster.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters5: 115–135.
