Participation in household preparedness activities is examined in light of the first highly publicized earthquake prediction issued for the Central United Stales. Drawing on earlier research conducted in California, this paper examines the adoption of self-protective measures in Memphis, Tennessee. Survey data show that while people in this city are generally aware of and concerned about the earthquake hazard in their community, few have adopted the necessary precautions to reduce the negative effects of a damaging earthquake. However, those respondents who were most likely to engage in self-protective behavior are situated in structurally advantageous locations. Thus, future community-wide planning and preparedness efforts must be more attentive to limitations on household resources when advocating individual responsibility for safety.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrannonR.1976. “Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior.” Pp. 145–198 in Social Psychology: An Introduction, edited by SeidenbergB., and SnadowskyA.New York: The Free Press.
2.
BourqueL.B., ReederL.G., CherlinA., RavenB.H., WaltonD.M.. 1973. The Unpredictable Disaster in a Metropolis: Public Response to the Los Angeles Earthquake of February, 1971.Los Angeles, California: Survey Research Center, University of California, Los Angeles.
3.
BurtonI., and KatesR.. 1964. “The Perception of Natural Hazards in Resource Management.” Natural Resources Journal3: 412–41.
4.
DillmanD.1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.New York: John Wiley and Sons.
5.
DynesR., and WengerD.. 1971. “Factors in the Community Perception of Water Resources.” Water Resources Bulletin7: 644–51.
6.
ErlichH. J.1969. “Attitudes, Behavior and the Intervening Variables.” The American Sociologist4: 29–34.
7.
GillespieD.F., and StreeterC.L.. 1987. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Disaster Preparedness.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters5(2): 155–176.
8.
HuttonJ., and MiletiD.. 1979. Analysis of Adoption and Implementation of Community Land Use Regulations for Floodplains.San Francisco, California: Woodward-Clyde.
MileliD.S., FitzpatickC., FarharB.C.. 1989. Risk Communication and Public Response to the Parkfield Earthquake Prediction Experiment.Boulder, Colorado: Hazards Assessment Laboratory, Colorado State University.
11.
MiletiD.S., and SorensenJ.H.. 1987. “Natural Hazards and Precautionary Behavior.” Pp. 191–207 in Taking Care: Understanding and Encouraging Self-Protective Behavior, edited by WeinsteinN.D.New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
NelkinD.1986. The Language of Risk.Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
13.
NiggJ. M.1982. “Communication Under Conditions of Uncertainty: Understanding Earthquake Forecasting.” Journal of Communication32(1): 27–36.
14.
PalmR. I.1981. “Public Response to Earthquake Hazard Information.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers71(3): 389–399.
RegulskaJ.1982. “Public Awareness Programs for Natural Hazards.” Pp. 36–70 in Perspectives On Increasing Hazard Awareness, edited by SaarinenT.F. Monograph #35. Program on Environment and Behavior. Boulder, Colorado: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
17.
SaarinenT. F.1982. “The Relation of Hazard Awareness to Adoption of Approved Mitigation Measures.” Pp. 1–35 in Perspectives On Increasing Hazard Awareness, edited by SaarinenT.F. Monograph #35. Program on Environment and Behavior. Boulder, Colorado: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
18.
SlovicP., KunreutherH., WhiteG.. 1974. “Decision Processes, Rationality, and Adjustment to Natural Hazards.” Pp. 187–204 in Natural Hazards: Local, National, Global, edited by WhileG.New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
SorensenJ.H., and WhiteG.F.. 1980. “Natural Hazards: A Cross-cultural Perspective.” Pp. 279–318 in Human Behavior and the Environment, edited by AltmanI., RapaportA., and WolwillJ.New York: Plenum.
20.
TarterD. E.1970. “Attitude: The Mental Myth.” American Sociologist5: 276–278.
21.
TierneyK.1981. “Community and Organizational Awareness Of and Preparedness for Acute Chemical Emergencies.” Journal of Hazardous MaterialsX: 331–342.
22.
TurnerR.H., NiggJ.M., and Heller-PazD.. 1986. Waiting for Disaster: Earthquake Watch in California.Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
23.
TverskyA., and KahnemanD.. 1974. “Judgement Under Uncertainty.” Science185: 1124–1131.
24.
Waters toneM.1978. Hazard Mitigation Behavior of Urban Flood Plain Residents. Natural Hazard Research Working Paper #35. Boulder, Colorado: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
25.
WeinsteinN.D. (ed.). 1987. Taking Care: Understanding and Encouraging Self-Protective Behavior.New York: Cambridge University Press.
