Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper identifies a set of processes which characterized the organized disaster response to Hurricane Hugo in Puerto Rico. It uses insights generated from the technology transfer literature to compare the relative effectiveness of three disaster mitigation programs in Puerto Rico, and to generalize to the likely difficulties inherent in international disaster mitigation programs emanating from core societies. In Puerto Rico the services of the Weather Service Forecasting Office and the computer model used to evacuate and shelter populations worked well. However, the coastal management program has had mixed success at best. This paper attempts to identify the causes of the differential effectiveness of these three programs by showing the similarities between the WSFO program and the SLOSH computer model and their differences from the coastal management program. It also considers other elements in the disaster response system that did not work as well: sheltering, long term emergency housing, and lifeline protection.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Briggs

Reginald P.

1961. “Recent Shoreline Changes and Sedimentation at Puerto Arccibo and Vicinity, Puerto Rico.” Shore and Beach. 16(April): 27–37.

Cintron

Gilberto

. 1981. Environmental Impact of Sand Extraction Activities on the Insular Shelf: Inshore and Near shore. Suva, Fiji: Resources Training Workshop, University of the South Pacific.

Coastal Barriers Study Group. 1987. Report to Congress: Coastal Barrier Resources System, Volume 21: Puerto Rico, Proposed Recommendations for Additions to or Deletions from the Coastal Barrier Resources System. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior.

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. 1987. Puerto Rico Flood Hazard Mitigation Plan. San Juan: Department of Natural Resources, Resources Planning Area.

Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1985. Federal Interagency Flood Hazard Mitigation Team Report for Puerto Rico, In Response to the October 10, 1985 Disaster Declaration (FEMA-746-DR-Puerto Rico). Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency

Gonzalez-Liboy

Jose

. Forthcoming. “An Overview of Coastal Planning in Puerto Rico.” In Living with the Shoreline of Puerto Rico, edited by Bush

D. M.

, Durham, North Carolina: Duke University, Program for the Study of Developed Shorelines.

Morelock

Jack

. 1978. Shoreline of Puerto Rico: Coastal One Management Program. San Juan, Puerto Rico: Department of Natural Resources.

Morelock

Jack

, Hernandez-Avila

Manuel

, Schwartz

Maurice L.

, and Hatfield

David M.

. 1985. “Net Shore-drift on the North Coast of Puerto Rico.” Shore and Beach. 40(October): 16–21.

National Academy of Sciences. 1990. Managing Coastal Erosion. Committee on Coastal Erosion Zone Management. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press.

10.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1989. NOAA Disaster Survey Report: Hurricane Hugo, September 15–22, 1989. Washington, D.C.: National Weather Service.

11.

Newsome

Ted

. 1989. Personal Communication to B. Aguirre. San Juan, Puerto Rico.

12.

Nichols

, Cerco

, Cintron

, Martinez

. 1989. “Coastal Dunes for Protection and Sand Resources.” Pp. 1302–1312 in Coastal Zone ‘89; Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on Coastal and Ocean Management. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers.

13.

Quarantelli

E. L.

1991. Personal Communication to B. Aguirre. Newark, Delaware: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.

14.

Uphoff

Norman

. 1986. Local Institutional Development. Greenwich, Connecticut: Kumarian Press.

15.

Whyte

William Foote

. 1984. Learning from the Field. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Disaster Programs as Technology Transfers: The Case of Puerto Rico in the Aftermath of Hurricane Hugo *

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References