Association of Bay Governments (ABAG).1979. Attorney's Guide to Earthquake Liability.San Francisco, California: Association of Bay Area Governments.
2.
council of State Governments.1977. The States and Natural Hazards.Washington, D.C.: The Council of State Governments.
3.
AvisF.1984. “Strict Liability or Liability Based on Faults? Another Look.” University of Dayton Law Review10: 5.
4.
alanterMarc. 1987. “When Legal Worlds Collide: Reflections of Bhopal, The Good Layer, and The American Law School.” Catholic University Law Review36: 717.
5.
ilmoreG.1972. “The Age of Antiquarius: On Legal History in a Time of Troubles.” University of Chicago Law Review39: 475.
6.
arrisJ.W.1979. Law and legal Science.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
7.
uffmanJames L.1979. “Government Liability for the External Cost of Earthquake Prediction.” Earthquake Prediction: Proceedings of the International Symposium of Earthquake Prediction. Tokyo, Japan: Terra Scientific Publishing Company 857.
8.
uffmanJames L.1983. “Government Liability and Natural Hazard Mitigation in Japan, the Soviet Union, China, New Zealand, and the United States.” The International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters1: 379.
9.
uffmanJames L.1984. “Policy Implications of Legal Liability for Government Involvement in Earthquake Engineering.” Proceedings of the Eighth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.” Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall7: 909.
10.
uffmanJames L.1986. Government Liability and Disaster Mitigation: A Comparative Study.Lanham, Maryland: University of Press of America.
11.
HuffmanJames L., and RosenSteven. 1977. Federal Tort Liability for Natural Disaster Warning Systems.Portland, Oregon: Natural Resources Law Institute.
12.
KuhnThomas S.1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolution.Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
13.
KuslerJon A.1982. Floodplain Regulations and The Courts 1970–1980.Boulder, Colorado: Natural Hazards Research Applications Information Center.
14.
LandesW.M., and PosnerR.A.. 1985. “A Positive Economic Analysis of Products Liability.” Journal of Legal Studies14: 535.
15.
LangdellChristopher C.1887. “Harvard Celebration Speech.” Law Quarterly Review3: 123.
16.
LevyEdward H.1949. An Introduction of Legal Reasoning.Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
17.
MewellynKarl N.1931. “Some Realism About Realism.” Harvard Law Review44: 1222.
18.
MerrymanJohn H.1985. The Civil Law Tradition (2nd ed.). Stanford, (New State): Stanford University Press.
19.
National Academy of Sciences.1975. Earthquake Prediction and Public Policy.Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
20.
National Academy of Sciences.1978. A Program of Studies on the Socioeconomic Effects of Earthquake Predictions.Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences97–114.
21.
PeczenikAleksander, LendahlLars, and RoermundBert Van. 1984. Theory of Legal Science.Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
22.
ProsserWilliam L., and KeetonW.P.. 1984. Handbook of the Law of Torts (4th ed.). St. Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing Co.
23.
StallerJ. M.1985. “The Advantage of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Tort Cases.” Practicing Lawyer31: 57.
24.
WrightJames D., and RossiPeter H. (ed.). 1981. Social Science and Natural Hazards.Cambridge, Massachusetts: Abt Books.
