BlairM.L., and SpangleW.E.. 1979. Seismic Safety and Land Planning -Selected Examples from California.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 941–B.
2.
BrysonJ. M.1983. “Representing and Testing Procedural Planning Methods.” Pp. 20–52 in Evaluating Urban Planning Efforts, edited by MasserIanHampshire, England: Gower, Inc.
3.
BurbyR., and FrenchS.. 1980. “The U.S. Experience in Managing Flood Plain Land Use.” Disasters: The International Journal of Disaster Studies and Practice4(4): 451–457.
4.
BurbyR., and FrenchS.. 1981. “Coping with Floods’. The Land Use Management Paradox.” Journal of the American Planning Association47(3): 289–300.
5.
BurbyR., and FrenchS.. 1985. Flood Plain Land Use Management: A National Assessment.Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
6.
California Seismic Safety Commission.1986. California at Risk: Reducing Earthquakes 1987 to 1992.Sacramento, California.
7.
DrabekT. E.1986. Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings.New York: Springer-Verlag.
8.
DrabekT.E., MushkatelA.H., KilijanekT.S.. 1983. Earthquake Mitigation Policy: The Experience of Two States.Boulder, Colorado: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
9.
EnderR.L., KimJ.C., SelkreggL., and JohnsonS.F.. 1988. “The Design and Implementation of Disaster Mitigation Policy.” Pp. 67–85 in Managing Disaster: Strategies and Policy Perspectives, edited by ComfortL.. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
10.
GodschalkD., BrowerD., BeatleyT.. 1989. Catastrophic Coastal Storms: Hazard Mitigation and Development Management, Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
11.
HanksT. C.1985. The National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program - Scientific Status. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1659. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey.
12.
HansenL., and HirschT.. 1983. Effectiveness Study of Wisconsin's Floodplain Management Program.Madison, Wisconsin: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
13.
HooperM.G., AlgermissenS.T., DobrovolnyE.. 1983. Estimation of Earthquake Effects Associated with a Great Earthquake in the New Madrid Seismic Zone. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 83-179. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey.
14.
HuttonJ.R., and MiletiD.S.. 1979. Analysis of Adoption and Implementation of Community Land Use Regulations for Floodplains.San Francisco: Woodward-Clyde Consultants.
15.
KariezJ., and LindellM.. 1987. “Planning for Uncertainty: The Case of Local Disaster Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association53(4): 487–498.
16.
LambrightH.1984. Role of States in Earthquake and Natural Hazards Innovation at the Local Level of Decision Making. A Report to the National Science Foundation. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse Research Corporation.
17.
MaderG.1980. Land Use Planning After Earthquakes.Portola Valley, California: William Spangle and Associates.
18.
McKelveyW.1982. Organizational Systematics.Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
19.
McNamaraJ.1978. “Determining Sample Size in Decision-Oriented Research Studies.” Planning and Changing: A Journal for School Administrators9(7): 125–127.
20.
MushkatelA.H., and NiggJ.M.. 1987a. “Opinion Congruence and the Formulation of Seismic Safety Policies.” Policy Studies Review6(4): 645–656.
21.
MushkatelA.H., and NiggJ.M.. 1987b. “The Effect of Objective Risk on Key Actor Support for Seismic Mitigation Policy.” Environmental Management11(1): 77–86.
22.
National Conference of States and Building Codes and Standards (NCSBCS).1988. Directory of Stale Building Codes and Regulations, Fourth Edition.Herdon, Virginia.
23.
OlsonR.S., and NilsonD.. 1982. “Public Policy Analysis and Hazards Research: Natural Complements.” The Social Science Journal19: 89–103.
24.
PedhazurE. J.1982. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction.New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
25.
SchollR.1986. Reducing Earthquake Hazards: Lessons Learned from Earthquakes. Publication 86–02. El Cierto, California: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
26.
SelkreggL.L., and PruessJ.. 1984. Earthquake Hazard Mitigation: Planning and Policy Implementation: The Alaska Case.Anchorage, Alaska: University of Alaska.
27.
SlovicP., KunreutherH., WhiteG.. 1974. “Decision Processes, Rationality, and Adjustment to Natural Hazards.” Pp. 187–204 in Natural Hazards: Local, National, Global, edited by WhiteG.. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Van de VenA. H.1980a. “Problem Solving, Planning and Innovation, Part I, Test of the Program Planning Model.” Human Relations33(10): 711–739.
29.
Van de VenA. H.1980b. “Problem Solving, Planning and Innovation, Part II, Speculation for Theory and Practice.” Human Relations33(11): 757–779.
30.
WhiteG., and HaasJ.E.. 1975. Assessment of Research on Natural Hazards.Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
31.
WynerA.J., and MannD.E.. 1986. Preparing for California's Earthquakes: Local Government and Seismic Safety.Berkeley, California: Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California.