The purpose of this paper is to pose and test a means to facilitate the comparative examination of interorganizational relations and behavior in emergency planning and response. Additionally we sought to define and ope rationalize the concept of inter and intraorganizational cohesion in emergencies,. The paper, following a review of literature on organizational behavior in disasters, describes an effort to define, and develop measures for twenty indicators of inter- and intraorganizational cohesion. Data on these indicators are collected for organizations in an emergency response network at a nuclear power plant. This is done for relationships in both pre-emergency planning and for an exercise of an emergency plan. Findings regarding cohesion are presented and the implications for refining emergency organizational theory are discussed. Overall it was found that internally organizations are fairly cohesive but that cohesiveness diminishes between organizations. Communications and lack of interaction clarity appear to be the chief reasons for decreases in cohesion. In order to understand why this occurs, it is necessary to investigate the antecedants of organizational behavior that lead to cohesion breakdowns.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsDavid1970. “The Red Cross: Organizational Sources of Operational Problems.” American Behavioral Science13(3) (Jan.-Feb.): 392–403.
2.
AndersonWilliam A1969. “Disaster Warning and Communication Processes in Two Communities.” The Journal of Communication19(2) (June): 92–104.
3.
BartonAllen H.1962. “The Emergency Social System.” In BakerGeorge W., and ChapmanDwight D. (eds.), Man and Society in Disaster.New York: Basic Books.
4.
BartonAllen H.1969Communities in Disaster.New York: Anchor Books.
5.
BrouilletteJohn R.1979Community Organizations Under Stress: A Study of Interorganizational Communication Networks During Natural Disasters. Dissertation. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University.
6.
BrouilletteJohn R., and QuarantelliE.L.1971. “Types of Patterned Variation in Bureaucratic Adaptations to Organizational Stress.” Sociological Quarterly41(Winter): 39–46.
7.
CliffordRoy A.1956The Rio Greande Flood: A Comparative Study of Border Communities. National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council Disaster Study No. 7. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
8.
DacyDouglas C., and KunreutherHoward1969The Economics of Natural Disasters.New York: The Free Press.
9.
DemerathNicholas J., and WallaceAnthony F.C.1957. “Human Adaptation to Disaster.” Human Organization16(Summer): 1–2.
10.
DrabekThomas E.1968Disaster in Isle 13.Columbus, Ohio: Disaster Research Center, Ohio State university.
11.
DrabekThomas E1981Managing Multiorganizational Emergency Responses: Emergent Search and Rescue Networks in Natural Disaster and Remote Area Settings.Boulder, Colorado: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
12.
DrabekThomas E., and Eugene HaasJ.1969a. “Laboratory Simulation of Organizational Stress.” American Sociological Review34(2) (April).
13.
DrabekThomas E., and Eugene HaasJ.1969b. “How Police Confront Disaster.” Transaction6(May): 33–38.
14.
DrabekThomas E., and QuarantelliEnrico L.1971. “When Disaster Strikes.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology1(2): 187–203.
15.
DynesRussell R.1966. “Theoretical Problems in Disaster Research.” Bulletin of Business Research41(Sept.): 7–9.
16.
DynesRussell R.1969Organized Behavior in Disasters: Analysis and Conceptualization.Columbus, Ohio: Disaster Research Center, The Ohio State University.
17.
DynesRussell R.1970Organized Behavior in Disaster.Lexington, Massachusetts: D.C. Heath and Company.
18.
DynesRussell R.1978. “Interorganizational Relations in Communities Under Stress.” Pp. 49–46 in QuarantelliE.L. (ed.), Disasters: Theory and Research.Beverly Hills, California: Sage.
19.
DynesRussell R., and Eugene HaasJ., and QuarantelliE.L.1967. “Administrative, Methodological, and Theoretical problems of Disaster Research.” Indian Sociological BulletinIV(July): 215–222.
20.
DynesRussell R., and QuarantelliE.L., and KrepsGary A.1972A Perspective on Disaster Planning.Columbus, Ohio: Disaster Research Center, The Ohio State University.
21.
DynesRussell R., and WarheitGeorge1969. “Organizations in Disasters.” EMO National Digest9(April-May): 12–13.
22.
EliotThomas D.1932. “The Bereaved Family.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (March): 1–7.
23.
FormWilliam H., and NosowSigmund1958Community in Disaster.New York: Harber & Brothers.
24.
FritzCharles E.1961. “Disaster.” Pp. 651–694 in Merton, and Nisbet (eds.), Contemporary Social Problems.New York: Harcourt.
25.
FritzCharles E.1968. “Disaster.” Pp. 202–207 in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences.New York: MacMillan.
26.
FritzCharles E., and MarksEH1954. “The NORC Studies of Human Behavior in Disaster.” Journal of Social Issues10: 26–41.
27.
FritzCharles E., and WilliamsHarry B.1957. “The Human Being in Disasters: A Research Perspective.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science309(Jan.): 42–51.
28.
GillespieD., and MiletiD.1979Technostructures and Organizational Relations.Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
29.
HaasJ. Eugene, and DrabekThomas E.1970. “Community Disaster and System Stress: A Sociological Perspective.” Pp. 264–286 in McGrathJoseph E. (ed.), Social and Psychological Factors in Stress.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
30.
HaasJ. Eugene, and DrabekThomas E.1973Complex Organizations: A Sociological Perspective.New York: MacMillan.
31.
Instituut Voor Sociaal Onderzoek Van Het Nederlandse Volk Amsterdam1955Studies in Holland Flood Disaster 1953, Committee on Disaster Studies of the National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, Volumes I–IV.Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
32.
KennedyWill C.1970. “Police Departments: Organization and Tasks in Disaster.” American Behavioral Scientis13(3) (Jan.-Feb.): 354–361.
33.
KrepsCary A.1978. “The Organization of Disaster Response: Some Fundamental Theoretical Issues.” Pp. 65–86 in QuarantelliE.L. (ed.), Disasters: Theory and Research.Beverly Hills: Sage.
34.
KutakRobert I.1938. “The Sociology of Crises: The Louisville Flood of 1937.” Social Forces17: 66–72.
35.
LeikRobert K., and CarterT.M., and ClarkJ.P.1981Community Response to Natural Hazard Warnings.University of Minnesota.
36.
McLuckieBenjamin F.1970. “A Study of Functional Response to Stress in Three Societies.”Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Departments of Sociology and Anthropology.” Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University.
37.
MiletiDennis S.1980. “Human Adjustment to the Risk of Environmental Extremes.” Sociology and Social Research64: 328–347.
38.
MiletiDennis S.1982Organizational Behavior and Interorganizational Relations. Unpublished report prepared for Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
39.
MiletiDennis S., and Eugene HaasJ., and DrabekThomas E.1975Human Systems in Extreme Environments.Boulder, Colorado: Institute of Behavioral Science.
40.
MooreHarry Estill1956. “Toward a Theory of Disaster.” American Sociological Review21(Dec.): 734–737.
41.
MooreH., BatesF., and LaymanM., and ParentonV.1963Before the Wind: A Study Response to Hurricane Carla. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council Diaster Study No. 19. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
42.
National Governors Association19791978 Emergency Preparedness Project Final Report.Washington, D.C.: National Guvernors Association.
43.
ParrArnold Richard1969. “Flood Preparation - 1969: Observations Concerning the Southern Manitoba Spring Flood Preparations.” EMO National Digest9(June-July): 25–27.
44.
QuarantelliEnrico L.1970. “The Community General Hospital: Its Immediate Problems in Disaster.” American Behavioral Scientist13(3) (Jan.-Feb.); 380–391.
45.
QuarantelliE.L., and DynesRussell R.1977. “Response to Social Crisis and Disaster.” Annual Review of Sociology3: 23–49.
46.
RodgersDavid, and WhettenDavid1982Interorganizational Coordination.Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
47.
RosowIrving L.1955Conflict of Authority in Natural Disasters. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Social Science. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University.
48.
ScottRichard1981Organizations: National, Natural and Open Systems.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
49.
SpiegelJohn P.1957. “The English Flood of 1953.” Human Organization16(Summer): 3–5.
50.
StallingsRobert A.1978. “The Structural Pattern of Four Types of Organizations in Disaster.” Pp. 87–104 in QuarantelliE.L. (ed.), Disasters: Theory and Research-BeverlyHills: Sage.
51.
ThompsonJames D.1967Organizations in Action.New York: McGraw-Hill.
52.
ThompsonJames D., and HawkesRobert W.1962. “Disaster, Community Organization and Administrative Process.” Pp. 268–300 in BakerGeorge W., and ChapmanDwight W. (eds.), Man and Society in Disaster.New York: Basic Books.
53.
Van de VenAndrew1976. “On the Nature, Formation and Maintenance of Relations Among Organizations.” Academy of Management Review1: 24–36.
54.
WarheitGeorge Jay1968. “The Impact of Four Major Emergencies on the Functional Integration of Four American Communities.” Dissertation. Columbus: The Ohio State University.
55.
WarheitGeorge J.1970. “Fire Departments: Operations During Major Community Emergencies.” American Behavioral Scientist13(3) (Jan.-Feb.): 362–368.
56.
WellerJack Meredith1972. “Innovations in Anticipation of Crisis: Organizational Preparations for Natural Disasters and Civil Disturbances.” Dissertation, Department of Sociology. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University.
