We first discuss psychological response and coping behavior in disaster situations. We confirm earlier findings that people have a tendency to interpret the signs of danger within their daily context and to underestimate the possibility of a disaster. It is suggested that the repetitive and consistent information would help to induce adaptive responses. The typical coping patterns found were: (1) information gathering behavior, (2) activities closely related to one's family, (3) preventive or protective behaviors, and (4) self protection by moving. We found the following six psychological determinants of coping behavior: (1) recognizing the seriousness of the situation, (2) knowing appropriate behavior for the situation faced, (3) expecting the projected coping response to be feasible, (4) perceiving the cost and reward of acting, (5) feeling of imminence of danger and, (6) the state of emotion of those involved.
In the last part of the article we examine evacuation behavior in particular, based on our surveys in four communities in Japan. The central factors which determine evacuation decisions were: (1) direct perception of threat, (2) exposure to the evacuation advice, (3) factors relating to family, (4) community preparedness, and (5) ’ demographic charactersties. We distinguish three basic phases in the evacuation process, that is, the timing of evacuation, the choice of transportation, and the sheltering activity. Threat conditions, exposure to evacuation advice, and one's location were found to relate to the timing of evacuation. Most people evacuated by car. No consistent pattern was found in the choice of shelters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelsonR.1976. “Script Processing in Attitude Formation and Decision Making.” Pp. 33–45 in CarrolJ., and PayneJ. (eds.) Cognition and Social Behavior.Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum.
2.
AbelsonR.1981. “Psychological Status of the Script Concept.” American Psychologist36: 715–729.
BanduraA., HardyN., and HowellsG.1980. “Tests of Generarity of Self-efficacy Theory.” Cognitive Therapy and Research4: 39–66.
5.
BronnerR.1973Decision Making under Time Pressure.Lexington: D.C. Heath.
6.
DrabekT., and BoggsK.1968. “Families in Disaster: Reactions and Relatives.” Journal of Marriage and the Family30: 443–451.
7.
DrabekT., and StephensonJ.1971. “When Disaster Strikes,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology11: 187–203.
8.
DynesR., and QuarantelliE.L.1973Images of Disaster Behavior: Myths and Consequences. Preliminary Paper No. 5. Columbus, Ohio: Disaster Research Center.
9.
EyzenckM.1982Attention and Arousal–Cognition and Performance.Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
10.
FisherS.1984Stress and the Perception of Control.Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum.
11.
FlynnC.1979Three Mile Island Telephone Survey, Tempe, Arizona: Mountain West Research.
12.
FormW., and NosowS.1958Community in Disaster.New York: Harper.
13.
FritzC.1961. “Disaster.” Pp. 651–695 in MertonR., and NisbetR. (eds.), Contemporary Social Problems.New York: Harcourt.
14.
FritzC., and MathewsonH.1957Convergence Behavior in Disasters: A Problem in Social Control.Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
15.
GreeneD.1976. “Social Perception as Problem Solving.” Pp. 155–161 in CarrolJ., and PayneJ. (eds.), Cognition and Social Behavior.Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum.
16.
HanniganJ., and KuenemanR.1978. “Anticipatory Flood Emergencies: A Case Study of a Canadian Disaster Subculture.” Pp. 129–146 in QuarantelliE.L. (ed.), Disaster: Theory and Research.Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage.
17.
The Institute of Journalism and Communication Studies, The University of Tokyo (IJCS)1978Coping Behavior in a So Called “Aftershock Panic.” (In Japanese).
18.
The Institute of Journalism and Communication Studies, The University of Tokyo (IJCS)1981Evacuation Behavior in Response to a Chemical Fire Disaster, (In Japanese).
19.
The Institute of Journalism and Communication Studies, The University of Tokyo (IJCS)1982a Citizen Coping Behavior in a False Earthquake Warning, (In Japanese).
20.
The Institute of Journalism and Communication Studies, The University of Tokyo (IJCS)1982b The Urakawa-oki Earthquake in 1982 and the Response of the Public, (In Japanese).
21.
The Institute of Journalism and Communication Studies, The University of Tokyo (IJCS)1983Organizational Acitivities during and after the Nagasaki Flood Disaster in July 1982, (In Japanese).
22.
The Institute of Journalism and Communication Studies, The University of Tokyo (IJCS)1984Citizen Activities during and after the Nagasaki Flood Disaster in July 1982, (In Japanese).
23.
The Institute of Journalism and Communication Studies, The University of Tokyo (IJCS)1985a Final Report of the Public Opinion Survey on Earthquake Prediction in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area. The Bulletin of the Institute of Journalism and Communication Studies, No. 33, (In Japanese).
24.
The Institute of Journalism and Communication Studies, The University of Tokyo (IJCS)1985b The Nihonkai-Chuubu Earthquake in 1983 and the Response of the Public, (In Japanese).
25.
The Institute of Journalism and Communication Studies, The University of Tokyo (IJCS)1985c Evacuation Behavior in Response to the Miyakejima Eruption in 1983, (In Japanese).
26.
The Institute of Journalism and Communication Studies, The University of Tokyo (IJCS)1985d Communication and Human Behavior in the Naganokenseibu Earthquake, (In Japanese).
27.
IkedaK.1982. “Warning of Disaster and Evacuation Behavior in a Japanese Chemical Fire.” Journal of Hazardous Materials7: 51–62.
28.
IkedaK.1983Human Response to a False Earthquake Warning in Japan. Unpublished paper.
29.
IkedaK.1984. “A Perspective on Decision Making—An Approach to Emergency Situations.” The Bulletin of the Institute of Journalism and Communication Studies32: 237–289, (In Japanese).
30.
IkedaK.1985. “Verification of the Emergency Decision-Making Model.” The Bulletin of the Institute of Journalism and Communication Studies33, (In Japanese).
31.
JanisI.1982a Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
32.
JanisI.1982b Counseling on Personal Decisions: Theory and Research on Short-term Helping Relationships.New Heaven: Yale University Press.
33.
JanisI., and MannL.1977Decision Making—A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment.New York: Free Press.
34.
JonesR.1977Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: Social, Psychological, and Physiological Effects of Expectancies.Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum.
35.
LeventhalH.1970. “Findings and Theory in the Study of Fear Communications.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology5: 119–186.
36.
MackR., and BakerG.1961The Occasion Instant.Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
37.
MajorB.1980. “Information Acquisition and Attribution Processes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology39: 1010–1024.
38.
MikamiS.1982. “Social Process of Disaster Warnings.” Pp. 73–107 in IJCS (ed.), Disasters and Human Behavior.Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press, (In Japanese).
39.
MikamiS.1984A Study of Evacuation Behavior in Miyakejima Eruption. In Proceedings of the Symposium on the Scientific Disaster Research held in Kagoshima (in Japanese).
40.
MiletiD., and BeckE.1975. “Communication in Crisis: Explaining Evacuation Symbolically.” Communication Research2: 24–49.
41.
MooreH.1963Before the Wind: A Study of the Response to Hurricane Carla.Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
42.
NeisserU.1976Cognition and Reality.San Francisco: Freeman.
43.
OkabeK., and MikamiS.1983A Study on the Socio-Psychological Effect of a False Warning of the Tokai Earthquake in Japan. Paper presented at the 10th World Congress of Sociology held in Mexico City.
44.
PerryR.1981Citizen Evacuation in Response to Nuclear and Non-nuclear Threats.Seattle: Battelle.
45.
PerryR., LindellM., and GreeneM.1981Evacuation Planning in Emergency Management.Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath and Co.
46.
QuarantelliE.L.1954. “The Nature and Conditions of Panic.” American Journal of Sociology60: 267–275.
47.
QuarantelliE.L.1957. “The Behavior of Panic Participants.” Sociology and Social Research41: 187–194.
48.
QuarantelliE.L.1980Evacuation Behavior and Problems: Findings and Implications from the Research Literature.Columbus, Ohio: Disaster Research Center.
49.
RogersR.1975. “A Protective Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change.” Journal of Personality91: 93–114.
50.
RotterJ.1966Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement.Psychological Monographs, Vol. 80.
51.
RumelnartD.1977Introduction to Human Information Processing.New-York: Wiley.
52.
SimeJ.D.1983. “Affiliative Behavior during Escape to Building Exits.” Journal of Environmental Psychology3: 21–41.
53.
SnyderM., and GangestadS.1981. “Hypothesis-Testing Processes.” New Directions in Attribution Research3: 171–196.
54.
SuttonS.1982. “Fear-Arousing Communications: A Critical Examination of Theory and Research.” Pp. 303–337 in EiserJ. (ed.), Social Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, New York: Wiley.
55.
TverskyA., and KahnemanD.1980. “Causal Schemata in Judgements under Uncertainty.” In FishbeinM. (ed.), Progress in Social Psychology.Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum.
56.
WarfieldJ.1973. “Binary Matrices in System Modeling.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics3: 441–449.
57.
WengerD.1975. “It's a Matter of Myths: An Empirical Examination of Individual Insight into Disaster Response.” Mass Emergencies1: 33–46.
58.
WengerD., and WellerJ.1973Disaster Subculture: The Cultural Residues of Community Disasters. Preliminary Paper, No. 9. Columbus, Ohio: Disaster Research Center.
59.
WilliamsH.1964. “Human Factors in Warning-and-Response Systems.” Pp. 79–104 in GrosserG. (eds.), The Threat of Impending Disaster.Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
60.
YanagidaK.1983Horrible Two Hours Eighteen Minutes, Tokyo: Bungei-Shunjuu (in Japanese).
