Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Major earthquakes were predicted on both sides of the Pacific in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan, and the state of California, the United States, at roughly the same time. These predictions differ from those made previously in that (1) the location, scale, and likelihood in a given timeframe have been specified; (2) the predictions for both regions have been taken seriously by the governments; and (3) there has been an unprecedented increase in earthquake concern among the area's residents.

In the present study, the American and Japanese reactions to these earthquake predictions are compared in terms of earthquake policy and the impact on residents’ lifestyles.

Conclusins are that (1) there is a major difference in the time, money, and energy spent on earthquake policy, Shizuoka being far better prepared than California; (2) Tokai earthquake policy is premised on the assumption of short-term predictability, but California policy is not; and (3) Shizuoka residents are ahead of Californians in earthquake preparedness, but public earthquake awareness is growing steadily in California, and should be considerably enhanced in the near future.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aki

1978. “Japanese Earthquake Prediction Research.” Earthquake Information Bulletin 10: 210–204.

California Department of Conservation 1982 Eartquake Planning Scenario for a Magnitude 8.3 Earthquake on the San Andreas Fault in Southern California. Special Publication No. 60. Sacramento, CA: Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology.

Committee on Earthquake Engineering Research 1982 Earthquake Engineering Research-1982: Overview and Recommendations. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council.

Davis

, and Somerville

1982. “Comparison Earthquake Prediction Approaches in the Tokai area of Japan and in California.” Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 72: 367–392.

Federal Emergency Management Agency 1980 An Assessment of the Consequences and Preparations for a Catastrophic California Earthquake: Findings and Actions Taken. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Haas

, and Mileti

1976 Socioeconomic Impact of Earthquake Prediction on Government, Business and Community. Boulder, Colorado: Institute of Behavioral Sciences, University of Colorado.

Hirose

in press “The Psychological Impact of the Tokai Earthquake Prediction: Mass Media's Coverage and Citizens’ Response.” Japanese Psychological Research.

Hirose

, and Ishizuka

1983. “Causal Analysis of Earthquake Concern and Preparing Behavior in Kita Izu District.” Japanese Psychological Research 25: 103–111.

Miyagawa

1981. “Disaster and Prefectural Administration.” Pp. 111–114 in Hirose

(ed.), Social Scientific Approaches to Disasters. Tokyo: Shinyosha, (In Japanese).

10.

National Land Agency 1983 Disaster Prevention White Paper. Tokyo: Ministry of Finance Printing Office, (In Japanese).

11.

Seismic Safety Commission 1982 Earthquake Hazard Management: An Action Plan for California. Sacramento, CA: Seismic Safety Commission.

12.

Turner

, Nigg

, and Young

1979 Earthquake Threat: Human response in Southern California. Los Angeles, CA: Institute for Social Science Research, University of California.

13.

Turner

, Nigg

, and Paz

, and Young

1980 Community Response to Earthquake Threat in Southern California. Part One: Objectives and Utilization. Los Angeles, CA: Institute for Social Science Research, University of California.

14.

Wesson

, and Filson

1981. “Development of Strategy of the Earthquake Prediction Program in the United States.” Pp. 671–680 in Simpson

D.W.

(ed.), Earthquake prediction: An International Review. Washington, D.C.: American Geophysical Union.

Earthquake Prediction in Japan and the United States

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References