This short paper is a case study of the RCR Lab located at the campus of Mid Sweden University in Northern Sweden. We argue that experimental design thinking in research and higher education in the fields of crisis and emergency management in social studies can ameliorate the post hoc methodological problem and shed light in the decision processes and information flow among first responders as well as public officials of various levels. The RCR Lab may be used as an enhanced, realistic space for the enrichment of role-playing and simulations, to activate students, as well as a sophisticated tool for the collection not only of quantitative, but also of qualitative data. The audience for this paper may be institutions of higher education that have a lab on campus and are looking for new ways of utilizing it, as well as educators in general who are looking for new ways to integrate experimental thinking in their classes.
BelléNicola. 2013. “Experimental Evidence on the Relationship between Public Service Motivation and Job Performance.” Public Administration Review73(1): 143–53.
2.
BorgattiStephen P., MehraAjay, BrassDaniel J., and LabiancaGiuseppe. 2009. “Network Analysis in the Social Sciences.” Science323(5916): 892–95.
3.
BozemanBarry, and McAlpineWilliam E.. 1977. “Goals and Bureaucratic Decision-Making: An Experiment.” Human Relations30(5): 417–429.
4.
BurroughsCatherine B.1990. “The Immediate Classroom: Feminist pedagogy and Peter Brook's The Empty Space.” Feminist Teacher5(2): 10–14.
5.
CarlsonRae. 1984. “What's Social about Social Psychology? Where's the Person in Personality Research?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology47(6): 1304–09.
6.
CampbellDonald T.1957. “Factors Relevant to the Validity of Experiments in Social Settings.” Psychological Bulletin54(4): 297–312.
7.
CourseyDavid H.1992. “Information Credibility and Choosing Policy Alternatives: An Experimental Test of Cognitive-Response Theory.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART2(3): 315–31.
8.
DoriYehudit Judy, BelcherJohn, BessetteMark, DanzigerMichael, McKinneyAndrew, and HultErin. 2003. “Technology for Active Learning.” Materials Today6(12): 44–49.
9.
DrabekThomas E., and HaasJ. Eugene. 1967. “Realism in Laboratory Simulation: Myth or Method?” Social Forces45(3): 337–46.
10.
Eastwick PaulW., LucyLucy Hunt, and NeffLisa. 2013. “External Validity, Why Art Thou Externally Valid? Recent Studies of Attraction Provide Three Theoretical Answers.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass7(5): 275–88.
11.
HolmesMegan R., TracyElizabeth M., PainterLori Longs, OestreichTina, and ParkHyunyong. 2015. “Moving from Flipcharts to the Flipped Classroom: Using Technology Driven Teaching Methods to Promote Active Learning in Foundation and Advanced Masters Social Work Courses.” Clinical Social Work Journal43(2): 215–24.
12.
MagatWesley A., PayneJohn W., and BrucatoPeter F.Jr.1986. “How Important Is Information Format? An Experimental Study of Home Energy Audit Programs.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management6(1): 20–34.
MitchellGregory. 2012. “Revisiting Truth or Triviality: The External Validity of Research in the Psychological Laboratory.” Perspectives on Psychological Science7(2): 109–17.
15.
MortonRebecca B., and WilliamsKenneth C.. 2008. “Experimentation in Political Science.” Pp. 339–56 in The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, edited by Box-SteffensmeierJanet M., BradyHenry E., and CollierDavid. Oxford, UK: OUP.
16.
MookDouglas G.1983. “In defense of external validity.” American Psychologist38(4): 379–87.
17.
RookMichael M., ChoiKoun, and McDonaldScott P.. 2015. “Learning Theory Expertise in the Design of Learning Spaces: Who Needs a Seat at the Table?” Journal of Learning Spaces4(1): 17–29.
18.
Schwartz-SheaPeregrine. 1991. “Understanding Subgroup Optimization: Experimental Evidence on Individual Choice and Group Processes.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART1(1): 49–74.
19.
ScottPatrick. 2015. “Laboratory Experiments in Public Policy and Management.” A Public Lecture presented on November 11. Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.
20.
ScottPatrick. 2000. “The Influence of Red Tape on Bureaucratic Behavior: An Experimental Simulation.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management19(4): 615–33.
21.
StallingsRobert A., ed. 2002. Methods of Disaster Research.Bloomington, IN: Xlibris Corporation.
22.
VissersGeert, HeyneGerton, PetersVincent, and GuertsJac. 2001. “The Validity of Laboratory Research in Social and Behavioral Science.” Quality & Quantity35(2): 129–45.
23.
WeissJanet A.1982. “Coping with Complexity: An Experimental Study of Public Policy Decision-Making.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management2(1): 66–87.
