Emergency alert messages are not always completely accessible for people who are Deaf that rely on American Sign Language (ASL). ASL is a visual and conceptual language that has its own unique syntax and grammar. ASL has no roots in English and is the 3rdmost taught foreign language in our colleges today. Not all individuals who are deaf rely on ASL for “clear and effective” communication. For many individuals who become hard-of-hearing or deaf later in life (late-deafened), closed captioning can provide accommodations. For individuals who are Deaf and rely on ASL as their primary language, closed captioning is not a useful means of communication because the information is being conveyed in a language most ASL users do not fully comprehend. Similarly, emergency alert messages delivered via SMS text or email can also present confusion to ASL users who may struggle to understand the written English messages. One size does not fit all; and in this case, English text as a sole means of communication is not entirely accessible for people who rely on ASL. This paper outlines the relationship between language, disability, and emergency messaging as learned from several research studies examining the accessibility of public alerts and warnings.
AguirreBenigno E.1988. “Feedback from the Field: The Lack of Warnings Before the Saragosa Tornado.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters6(1): 65–74.
2.
BahanBenjamin J.1996. “Non-Manual Realization of Agreement in American Sign Language.” Ph.D. Dissertation. Boston University, Boston, MA.
3.
BealeJ.1973. Prepared statement of the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf. In the Bilingual Courts Act: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Improvements in Judicial Machinery of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-Third Congress, Second Session, on S. 1724.Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
4.
BennettD., BakerP., MitchellH.. 2017. “New Media and Accessible Emergency Communications.” Pp. 119–130 in Disability and Social Media: Global Perspectives, edited by EllisKatie, and KentMikeNew York, NY: Routledge.
5.
BennettD., PhillipsB., DavisE.. 2017. “The Future of Accessibility in Disaster Conditions: How Wireless Technologies Will Transform the Life Cycle of Emergency Management.” Futures Journal87: 122–32.
6.
BornsteinHarry, SaulnierKaren L., HamiltonLillian B., and MillerRalph R.. 1983. The Comprehensive Signed English Dictionary.Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
ChiodoKay. 2014. Consultation with Kay Chiodo, Founder and CEO, Deaf Link: Accessible Emergency Messaging for People with Sensory Disabilities. An interview at the IPAWS Alerts for People with Disabilities or Language Differences (Contract # HSFE5-13-P-0434), Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
11.
Department of Justice (DOJ).2006. “ADA Best Practices Toolkit for State and Local Governments: About this Toolkit.” Washington, DC. Retrieved 15, 2014 (http://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/noticetoolkit.pdf).
12.
Department of Justice (DOJ).2007. “Title II Checklist: General Effective Communication.” ADA Best Practices Tool Kit for State and Local Governments. Washington, DC. Retrieved March 15, 2014 (http://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/abouttoolkit.pdf.).
13.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC).2007. In the matter of the Review of the Emergency Alert System. Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, (EB Docket No, 04-296). Washington, DC.
14.
FergusonCharles A., FineganEdward, HeathShirley B., and RickfordJohn R.. 2004. Language in the USA: Themes for the Twenty-First Century.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
FriedmanDaniela B., TanwarManju, and RichterJane V.E.. 2008. “Evaluation of Online Disaster and Emergency Preparedness Resources.” Prehospital and Disaster Medicine23(5): 438–46.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
18.
JohnsonRobert E., LiddellScott K., and ErtingCarol J.. 1989. Unlocking the Curriculum: Principles for Achieving Access in Deaf Education. Gallaudet Research Institute Working Paper, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC.
19.
JonesNancy L.2010. The Americans with Disabilities Act and Emergency Preparedness and Response. Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC. Retrieved March 12, 2014 (http://fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/RS22254.pdf).
20.
KacorriHernisa, LuPengfei, and HuenerfauthMatt. 2013. “Evaluating facial expressions in American sign language animations for accessible online information.” Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design Methods, Tools, and Interaction Techniques for eInclusion. 8009: 510–19.
21.
KailesJune I.2008. Southern California Wildfires After Action Report. Prepared in partnership with the Access to Readiness Coalition, The California Foundation for Independent Living Centers, and The Center for Disability Issues and the Health Professions at Western University of Health Sciences. Retrieved March 10, 2014 (http://www.jik.com/CaliforniaWildfires.pdf).
22.
KailesJ.I., and EndersA.. 2007. “Moving beyond Special Needs: A function-based Framework for Emergency Management and Planning.” Journal of Disability Policy Studies17(4): 230–37.
23.
KongW.W., and RanganathS.. 2010. “Sign Language Phoneme Transcription with Rule-based Hand Trajectory Segmentation.” J Sign Process Syst59: 211–22.
24.
Laurent Clerc National Deaf Education Center.2000. States that Recognize American Sign Language as a Foreign Language.Laurent Clerc National Deaf Education Center, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC.
25.
LindellMichael K., and PerryRonald W.. 2004. Communicating Environmental Risk in Multiethnic Communities.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
26.
MiletiDennis. 1999. Disasters by design.Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
27.
MitchellRoss E.2006. “How Many Deaf People Are There in the United States? Estimates from the Survey of Income Program Participation.” Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education11(1): 112–19.
28.
MitchellHelena, JohnsonJ., LaForceSalimah, LuciaFrank, PriceEd, and MorrisJohn. 2011. “Ex Parte Comments filed.” Pp. 9–17 in the Open proceedings of the Emergency Alert System [04-296] and the Commercial Mobile Alert System [07–287]. Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC, April 25, 2011.
29.
MitchellRoss E, and KarchmerMichael A.. 2011. “Demographic and Achievement Characteristics of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students.” Oxford handbook of Deaf studies, language, and education1: 18–31.
30.
MitchellRoss E., YoungTravas A., and BachledaBellamie. 2006. “How many people use ASL in the United States? Why estimates need updating.” Sign Language Studies6(3): 306–35.
31.
MontoyaLouise A., EngatovichReginald, EchardtElizabeth A., GoldsteinMarjorie T., GoldsteinRichard A., and SteinbergAnnie G.. 2004. “Translation Challenges and Strategies: The ASL Translation of a Computer-Based, Psychiatric Diagnostic Interview.” Sign Language Studies4(4): 314–44.
32.
National Association of the Deaf.2000. Legal Rights, 5th Ed.: The Guide for Deaf and Hard of Hearing People.Gallaudet University Press, Washington, DC.
33.
National Council on Disability.2005. Saving Lives: Including People with Disabilities in Emergency Planning.Washington, DC.
34.
NeidleCarol J.2000. The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
PaddenC., and HumphriesT.. 1988. Deaf in America: Voices from a Culture.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
PeacockW.G., GirardC., MorrowB.H., GladwinH., RagsdaleK.A.. 1997. “Social systems, ecological networks and disasters: Toward a socio-political ecology of disasters.” Pp. 20–35 in Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters, edited by PeacockNew York, NY: Routledge.
37.
PegueroA. A.2006. “Latino disaster vulnerability: The dissemination of hurricane mitigation information among Florida's homeowners.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences28(1), 5–22.
38.
PerryR. (1987). “Racial and Ethnic Minority Citizens in Disasters.” Pp. 87–99 in Sociology of Disasters, edited by DynesR., PelandaC.. Goriza, Italy: Franco Angelli.
39.
PollardRobert Q.Jr., DeanRobyn K., O'HearnAmanda, and HaynesSharon L.. 2009. “Adapting Health Education Material for Deaf Audiences.” Rehabilitation Psychology54.2(2009): 232–38.
40.
ReaganTimothy. 2011. “Ideological Barriers to American Sign Language: Unpacking Linguistic Resistance.” Sign Language Studies11(4): 606–36.
41.
ReillyJudy, and McIntireMarina L.. 1980. “American Sign Language and Pidgin Sign English: What's the Difference?” Sign Language Studies27: 151–92.
42.
RosenstockRachel. 2008. “The Role of Iconicity in International Sign.” Sign Language Studies8(2): 131–218.
ScheinJerome D.1989. At Home among Strangers.Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
45.
SmithRobert C.2010. The Case About Amy.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
46.
StoughL. M., and KelmanI.. 2017. “People with disabilities and disasters.” Pp. 225–42 in Handbook of disaster research, edited by RodríguezH., QuarantelliE.L., DynesR.R.. New York, NY: Springer.
47.
TownsendFrances F.2006. The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons learned.Washington, DC: The White House.
U.S. Department of Education (USED).2006. “Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with Disabilities: Final Rule.” 34 C.F.R. § 300 and 301, Federal Register, 71: 156: 46540–845.
52.
WestDarrell M., and OrrMarion. 2007. “Race, Gender, and Communications in Natural Disasters.” Policy Studies Journal35: 569–86.
53.
WilcoxSherman, and PeytonJoy Kreeft. 1999. “American Sign Language as Foreign Language.” CAL Digest February 1999:159–60. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
54.
WisnerBen, BlaikieP., CannonT., DavisI.2004. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters.New York, NY: Routledge.
55.
WoodwardJames, and DesantisSusan. 1977. “Negative Incorporation in French and American Sign Language.” Language in Society6(3): 379–88.
