Disasters such as the storms that affected Sweden in 2005 and 2007 showed that citizens initially conducted a large part of the disaster response, such as clearing roads, giving psychosocial support to affected neighbours and repairing power lines in collaboration with power companies. As a result of these storms, an Emergent Citizen Group (ECG) was established in a village which continued to work on risk prevention, even after the event. The aim of this paper is to describe and analyse this local emergent citizen group's continuing work on the prevention of local risk and vulnerability, and particularly, their work on flood prevention. The results indicate that authorities seldom understand the ECG's concerns about risks. Authorities also lack the experience and capacity to collaborate with, and support, the ECG's risk and vulnerability reduction work. Bureaucratic barriers and declining motivation among volunteers within the ECGs could undermine commitment to the prevention of risks.
BardoJohn W.1978. “Organisational Response to Disaster: A Typology of Adaption and Change.” Mass Emergencies3: 87–104.
2.
BloorDavid. 1999. “Anti-Latour.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science30: 81–112.
3.
BrennanMark A., and FlintCourtney G.. 2007. “Uncovering the Hidden Dimensions of Rural Disaster Mitigation: Capacity Building through Community Emergency Response Teams.” Southern Rural Sociology22: 111–126.
4.
CampbellDavid A.2010. “Stand by Me. Organization Founding in the Aftermath of Disaster.” The American Review of Public Administration.40: 351–369.
5.
CallonMichel. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation; Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” Pp. 196–233 in Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge?, edited by LawJohnLondon: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
6.
CollinsHarry M., and YearleySteven. 1992. “Epistemological Chicken.” Pp. 301–329 in Science as Practice and Culture, edited by PickeringAndrewChicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
DavidEmmanuel. 2006. “Emergent Behavior and Groups in Postdisaster New Orleans: Notes on Practices of Organized Resistance.” Pp. 235–261 in Learning from Catastrophe: Quick Response Research in the Wake of Hurricane Katrina, Boulder, CO: Natural Hazards Center.
8.
DavidEmmanuel. 2010. ““Studying” Up on Women and Disaster: An Elite Sustained Women's Group Following Hurricane Katrina.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters28: 246–269.
9.
DrabekThomas E.2006. “Community Processes: Coordination.” Pp. 217–233 in Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by RodriguezHavidan, QuarantelliEnrico L., and DynesRussell R.New York: Springer.
10.
DrabekThomas E., and McEntireDavid A.. 2003. “Emergent Phenomena and the Sociology of Disaster: Lessons, Trends and Opportunities from the Research Literature.” Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal12: 97–112.
11.
DynesRussell R.1970. Organized Behavior in Disaster.Lexington, MA: Heath-Lexington Books.
12.
DynesRussell R.1994. “Community Emergency Planning: False Assumptions and Inappropriate Analogies.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters12: 141–158.
13.
DynesRussell R.1998. “Coming to Terms with Community Disaster.” Pp. 109–126 in What Is a Disaster?: Perspectives on the Question, edited by QuarantelliEnrico Louis. London: Routledge.
14.
ErikssonKerstin. 2010. Preparing for Preparedness - Shaping Crisis Planning Processes in Local Authorities. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
15.
FurediFrank. 2008. “Fear and Security: A Vulnerability-Led Policy Response.” Social Policy & Administration42: 645–661.
16.
ForrestThomas R.1978. “Group Emergence in Disasters.” Disasters: Pp. 105–125 in Disaster Theory and Research, edited by QuarantelliEnrico L.London: Sage.
GolinskiJan. 1998. Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
GreenKenneth E., NealDavid M., and QuarantelliEnrico L. 1984. Disaster-Related Emergent Citizen Groups: An Examination of Their Relationships to Other Organizations. Preliminary paper No. 94. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
20.
GuldåkerNicklas. 2009. Krishantering, Hushåll Och Stormen Gudrun. Att Analysera Hushålls Krishanteringsförmåga Och Sårbarheter (An Analysis of Housholds Crisis Management Capability and Vulnerability) (in Swedish with an English Summary). Doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
21.
HabermasJürgen. 1987. The Theory of the Communicative Action. The Critique of Functionalist Reason (Theorie Des Kommunikativen Handelns Band 2: Zur Kritik Der Funktionalistischen Vernunft) (Thomas McCarthy, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
22.
HabermasJürgen. 1990. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Twelve Lectures (Der Philosphische Diskurs Der Moderne: Zwölf Vorlesungen) (Thomas McCarthy, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
23.
HaasJ. Eugene, KatesRobert W., and BowdenMartyn J.. 1977. Reconstruction Following Disaster.The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England.
24.
HaigBrian H.2008. “An Abductive Perspective on Theory Construction”. The Journal of Theory Construction & Testing12: 7–10.
25.
Jeppsson GrassmanEva, and SvedbergLars. 2007. “Civic Participation in a Scandinavian Welfare State: Patterns in Contemporary Sweden.” Pp. 126–164 in State and Civil Society in Northern Europe, edited by TrädgårdhLarsNew York, Oxford: Berghahn Books.
26.
KlagMalvina, and LangleyAnn. 2013. “Approaching the Conceptual Leap in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Management Reviews.15: 149–166.
27.
KrepsGary A.1983. “The Organization of Disaster Response Core Concepts and Processes.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters1: 440–465.
28.
KrepsGary A., and BosworthSusan L.. 2006. “Organizational Adaptation to Disaster.” Pp. 297–315 in Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by RodriguezHavidan, QuarantelliEnrico L., and DynesRussell R.New York: Springer.
29.
LatourBruno. 1991. “Technology Is Society Made Durable.” Pp. 103–131 in A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, edited by LawJohnLondon: Routledge.
30.
LatourBruno. 1992. “The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts.” Pp. 225–258 in Shaping Technology/ Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by BijkerWiebe, and LawJohnCambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
McCarthyJohn D., and ZaldMayer N.. 2001. “The Enduring Vitality of the Resource Mobilization Theory of Social Movements.” Pp. 533–565 in Handbook of Sociological Theory, edited by TurnerJonathan H.
32.
McEntireDavid A.2006. “Local Emergency Management Organizations.” Pp. 168–182 in Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by RodriguezHavidan, QuarantelliEnrico L., and DynesRussell R.New York: Springer.
33.
NealDavid M.1983. “Types and Functions of Umbrella Organizations for Local Social Movement Organizations: A Look at Emergent Citizen Groups in Disasters.” Pp. 119–122 in Sociological Research Symposium XIII, Richmond, VA.
34.
NealDavid M.1985. A Comparative Analysis of Emergent Group Behavior in Disaster: A Look at the United States and Sweden. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
35.
NealDavid M., and PhillipsBrenda D.. 1990. “Female-Dominated Local Social Movement Organizations in Disaster-Threat Situations.” Pp. 242–255 in Women and Social Protest, edited by WestGuida, and BlumbergRhoda LoisNew York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Nieminen KristoferssonTuija. 2002. Krisgrupper Och Spontant Stöd: Om Insatser Efter Branden I Göteborg 1998 (Crisis Groups and Spontaneous Support - on Measures after the Fire in Gothenburg 1998) (in Swedish with an English Summary). Doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
37.
Nieminen KristoferssonTuija. 2007. Sårbar Men Inte Ensam: En Studie Av Några Drabbades Erfarenheter Av Kemiraolyckan, Tsunamin Och Stormen Gudrun (Vulnerable but Not Alone: A Study of Some Affected Individuals Experiences of Kemira, the Tsunamin and the Storm Gudrun) (in Swedish).Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
38.
PerryRonald W., GillespieDavid F., and MiletiDennis S.. 1974. “System Stress and the Persistence of Emergent Organizations.” Sociological Inquiry, 44: 111–119.
39.
QuarantelliEnrico L.1970. “Emergent Accommodation Groups: Beyond Current Collective Behavior Typologies.” Pp. 111–123 in Human Nature and Collective Behavior: Papers in Honor of Herbert Blumer. edited by ShibutaniTamotsu, ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
40.
QuarantelliEnrico L.1984a. Emergent Behavior at the Emergency Time Periods of Disasters. DRC Final Project Reports No. 31. Newark, DE: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
41.
QuarantelliEnrico L.1984b. Emergent Citizen Groups in Disaster Preparedness and Recovery Activities. DRC Final Project Reports No. 33. Newark, DE: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
42.
QuarantelliEnrico L.1987. Citizen Groups and Hazardous Waste: Their Careers and Conditions for Emergence. Preliminary Paper #124. Newark, DE: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
43.
QuarantelliEnrico L.1995. Emergent Behaviors and Groups in the Crisis Time of Disasters. DRC Preliminary Paper No. 226. Newark, DE: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
44.
QuarantelliEnrico L., DynesRussell R., and HaasEugene J.. 1966. Organizational Functioning in Disaster: A Preliminary Report. DRC Working Paper no. 7. Newark, DE: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
45.
QuarantelliEnrico L., GreenKenneth E., EricIreland, SusanMcCabe, and NealDavid M.. 1983. Emergent Citizen Groups in Disaster Preparedness and Recovery Activities. An Interim Report. Miscellaneous report No. 33. Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
46.
QuarantelliEnrico L., LagadecPatrick, and BoinArjen. 2006. “A Heuristic Approach to Future Disaster and Crisis: New, Old, and in-between Types.” Pp. 16–41 in Handbook of Disaster Research, edited by RodriguezHavidan, QuarantelliEnrico L., and DynesRussell R.New York: Springer.
47.
RodríguezHavidán, JosephTrainor, and QuarantelliEnrico L.. 2006. “Rising to the Challenges of a Catastrophe: The Emergent and Prosocial Behavior Following Hurricane Katrina.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science604: 82–101.
48.
RossAlexander G.1980. “The Emergence of Organization Sets in Three Ecumenical Disaster Recovery Organizations: An Empirical and Theoretical Exploration.” Human Relations33: 23–39.
49.
RothsteinBo, and TrägårdhLars. 2007. “The State and Civil Society in a Historical Perspective: The Swedish Case.” Pp. 229–253 in State and Civil Society in Northern Europe, edited by TrädgårdhLarsNew York, Oxford: Berghahn Books.
50.
SaundersSarah L., and KrepsGary A.. 1987. “The Life History of the Emergent Organization in Times of Disaster.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science23: 443–462.
51.
ScanlonJoseph. 1999. “Emergent Groups in Established Frameworks: Ottawa Carletons's Response to the 1998 Ice Disaster.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management7: 30–37.
52.
SFS.2006. Lag Om Kommuners Och Landstings Åtgärder Inför Och Vid Extraordinära Händelser I Fredstid Och Höjd Beredskap (Act on Municipal and County Council Measures Prior to and During Extra-Ordinary Events in Peacetime and During Periods of Heightened Alert) (in Swedish).
53.
StallingsRobert A., and QuarantelliEnrico L.. 1985. “Emergent Citizen Groups and Emergency Management.” Public Administration Review45: 93–100.
The National Encyclopaedia.2012. The Concept: “Rote” (in Swedish). Retrieved September 5, 2012, from http://www.ne.se/lang/rote/295708.
56.
The Swedish Government proposition 2007/08:92. Stärkt Krisberedskap–För Säkerhets Skull (Enhanced Emergency Preparedness - for Safety's Sake) (in Swedish). Retrieved October 23, 2012.
57.
WachtendorfTricia. 2004. Improvising 9/11: Organizational Improvisation Following the World Trade Center Disaster. Doctoral dissertation, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
WengerDennis E.1978. “Community Response to Disaster: Functional and Structural Alterations.” Pp. 18–47 in Disasters: Theory and Research, edited by QuarantelliEnrico L.London: Sage.
60.
WengerDennis E.1992. “Emergent and Volunteer Behavior during Disaster: Research Findings and Planning Implications.” HHRC Publication 27P.College Station, TX: Hazard Reduction Recovery Center, Texas A&M University.
