This study examines messages sent by users of the microblog service Twitter during natural and technological disasters. A constant comparison model is used to generate categories of content in an attempt to build an inductive picture of the kinds of messages microblog users seek and send during disasters. Results offer insights for communicators, planners, responders, and other professionals about how messages differ depending on disaster type, disaster size, and whether users are communication professionals or “citizen journalists.”
AlbarranAlan B., AndersonTonya, BejarLigia Garcia, BussartAnna L., DaggettElizabeth, GibsonSarah, GormanMatt, GreerDanny, GuoMiao, HorstJennifer L., KhalafTania, LayJohn Phillip, McCrackenMichael, MottBill, and WayHeather. 2007. “‘What Happened to Our Audience?’ Radio and New Technology Uses and Gratifications Among Young Adult Listeners.” Journal of Radio Studies14: 92–101.
2.
AnableDavid. 2006. “The Role of Georgia's Media–and Western Aid–in the Rose Revolution.” Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics11: 7–43.
3.
BalesRobert F.1950. A Set of Categories for the Analysis of Small Group Interactions. American Sociological Review15: 257–263.
4.
BormannErnest G.1990. Small Group Communication: Theory and Practice.New York: Harper & Row.
DrabekThomas E.1986. Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings.New York: Springer-Verlag.
8.
DynesRussell R., and TierneyKathleen J. (eds). 1994. Disasters, Social Behavior, and Collective Organization.Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press.
9.
EnarsonElaine, and MorrowBetty Hearn (eds). 1998. The Gendered Terrain of Disaster: Through Women's Eyes.Westport, CT: Praeger.
10.
FitzpatrickColleen, and MiletiDennis S.. 1994. “Public Risk Communication.” Pp. 71–84 in Disasters, Social Behavior, and Collective Organization, edited by DynesRussell R., and TierneyKathleen J.Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press.
11.
GlaserBarney G., and StraussAnselm L.. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.Chicago: Aldine.
12.
GreerClark F., and FergusonDouglas A.. 2011. “Using Twitter for Promotion and Branding: A Content Analysis of Local Television Twitter Sites.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media55: 198–214.
13.
HansonGary, and HaridakisPaul. 2008. “YouTube Listeners Watching and Sharing the News: A Uses and Gratifications Approach.” The Journal of Electronic Publishing11: 6.
14.
HughesAmanda Lee, and PalenLeysia. 2009. “Twitter Adoption and Use in Mass Convergence and Emergency Events.” Proceedings of the 6th International ISCRAM Conference. Gothenburg, Sweden, May 2009, edited by J. Landgren and S. Jul.
15.
IyengarShanto, and HahnKyu S.. 2007. “Natural Disasters in Black and White: How Racial Cues Influenced Public Response to Hurricane Katrina.” Retrieved April 17, 2010 (pcl.stanford.edu/common/docs/research/iyengar/2007/katrina-cues.pdf).
16.
KrippendorffKlaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology.2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
LindellMichael K., and PerryRonald W.. 2004. Communicating Environmental Risk in Multiethnic Communities.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
LindellMichael K., PerryRonald W., PraterCarla, and PerryRonald W.. 2007. Introduction to Emergency Management.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
19.
ListerMartin, DoveyJon, GiddingsSeth, GrantIain, and KellyKieran. 2003. New Media: A Critical Introduction.London: Routledge.
20.
MaloneMichael, 2008. “New Media, New Newsrooms: Stations Overhaul Staffs, Philosophy to Tackle Web.” Broadcasting and Cable (14 January): 22–23.
21.
McQuailDenis. 2000. McQuail's Mass Communication Theory, 4th ed.London: Sage.
22.
MiladiNoureddine. 2011. “Tunisia: A Media Led Revolution?” Media Development2011: 8–12.
23.
MiletiDennis S.1999. Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States.Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
24.
MiletiDennis S., and O'BrienPaul W.. 1992. “Warnings During Disaster: Normalizing Communicated Risk.” Social Problems39: 40–57.
25.
Mungiu-PippidiAlina, and MunteanuIgor. 2009. “Moldova's ‘Twitter Revolution.”’ Journal of Democracy20: 136–142.
26.
NavarroMireya. 1995. “Damage Heavy as Hurricane Ravages St. Thomas.” New York Times (17 September): 1A.
27.
PalenLeysia, AndersonKenneth M., MarkGloria, MartinJames, SickerDouglas, PalmerMartha, and GrunwaldDirk. 2010. “A Vision for Technology-Mediated Support for Public Participation and Assistance in Mass Emergencies and Disasters.” Proceedings of ACM-BCS Visions of Computer Science, 1–11. Retrieved August 23, 2010 (www.cs.colorado.edu/users/palen/computingvisionspaper.pdf)
28.
PalserBarb. 2009. “Hitting the Tweet Spot: News Outlets Should Use Twitter to Reach Elusive and Valuable Audiences.” American Journalism Review (April-May): 54.
29.
ParisiAlbert J.1989. “New Radio Group Gains Recognition.” New York Times (11 June): 12NJ8.
QuYan, WuPhilip Fei, and WangXiaoqing. 2009. “Online Community Response to Major Disaster: A Study of Tianya Forum in the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake.” 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–11.
32.
QuigleyRobert. 2010. “Reshaping Journalism.” The Austin American-Statesman, April 25, 1F.
33.
RamirezArtemio, DimmickJohn, FeasterJohn, and LinShu-Fang. 2008. “Revisiting Interpersonal Media Competition: The Gratification Niches of Instant Messaging, E-Mail, and the Telephone.” Communication Research35: 529–547.
ShklovskiIrina, PalenLeysia, and SuttonJeanette. 2008. “Finding Community Through Information and Communication Technology During Disaster Events.” Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Retrieved August 23, 2010 (spot.colorado.edu/∼suttonj/cscw460-shklovski.pdf).
40.
StarbirdKate, PalenLeysia, HughesAmanda L., and ViewegSarah. 2010. “Chatter on The Red: What Hazards Threat Reveals about the Social Life of Microblogged Information.” Paper presented at the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. February 6–10, 2010, Savannah, GA.
41.
UristaMark A., DongQingwen, and DayKenneth D.. 2009. “Explaining Why Young Adults Use Twitter and Facebook Through Uses and Gratifications Theory.” Human Communication12: 215–229.
42.
VeilShari. 2007. “Mayhem in the Magic City: Rebuilding Credibility in a Communication Train Wreck.” Public Relations Review33: 337–339.
43.
ViewegSarah, HughesAmanda L., StarbirdKate, and PalenLeysia. 2010. “Microblogging During Two Natural Hazards Events: What Twitter May Contribute to Situational Awareness.” Paper presented at the 2010 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 10–15, 2010, Atlanta, GA.
44.
VulteeFred. 2009. “News Frames of Mitigation and Responsibility After Hurricane Katrina.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters27: 103–126.
45.
WengerDennis. 1985. “Mass Media and Disasters.” Preliminary paper #98, University of Delaware.
46.
WengerDennis, and FriedmanBarbara. 1986. “Local and National Media Coverage of Disaster: A Content Analysis of the Print Media's Treatment of Disaster Myths.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters4: 27–50.
