One hundred-fifteen pet care professionals (veterinarians, boarding kennels, groomers, etc.) from Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas were surveyed following Hurricanes Gustav and Ike regarding their preparedness for and response to these hurricanes. Results indicate this group is similar to the public in some respects including reliance on television for weather information, and evacuation being related to 1) having a plan for evacuation, 2) being in an area ordered to evacuate, and 3) not requiring outside resources to accomplish the evacuation. Respondents’ decisions were uniquely complicated by their role as both residents and also caregivers of animals owned by other residents who also may need to evacuate. Finally, a large percentage of this group had emergency plans, which may have been influenced by state laws or their experiences with Hurricanes Katrina or Rita. Back-up plans are recommended when emergency plans rely on owners claiming animals prior to an evacuation.
ArlikattiSudha, LindellMichael K., PraterCarla S., and ZhangYang. 2006. “Risk Area Accuracy and Hurricane Evacuation Expectations of Coastal Residents.” Environment and Behavior38: 226–247.
2.
BakerEarl J.1991. “Hurricane Evacuation Behavior.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters9: 287–310.
3.
BeaverBonnie V., GrosRobert, BaileyE. Murl, and LovernCindy S.. 2006. “Report of the 2006 National Animal Disaster Summit.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association229: 943–948.
4.
Bureau of Labor Statistics2009. Occupational Outlook Handbook 2008–2009. Available at www.bls.gov/oco/home.htm
5.
BurnsKatie. 2006. “Animal Facilities Need to Plan for Disasters.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association229: 903.
6.
BurnsideRandolph, MillerDeMond Shondell, and RiveraJason D.. 2007. “The Impact of Information and Risk Perception on the Hurricane Evacuation Decision-Making of Greater New Orleans Residents.” Sociological Spectrum27: 727–740.
7.
BurrusRobert T., DumasChristopher F., FarrellClaude H., and HallWilliam W.Jr.2002. “Impact of Low-Intensity Hurricanes on Regional Economic Activity.” Natural Hazards Review2: 118–125.
8.
DashNicole, and GladwinHugh. 2007. “Evacuation Decision Making and Behavioral Responses: Individual and Household.” Natural Hazards Review8: 69–77.
9.
DrobotSheldon. 2007. Evaluation of Winter Storm Warnings: A Case Study of the Colorado Front Range December 20–21, 2006, Winter Storm. Quick Response #192. Natural Hazards Research Applications and Information Center: Boulder, CO
10.
EdmondsAndrew S., and CutterSusan L.. 2008. “Planning for Pet Evacuations during Disasters.” Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management5(1): 1–18. Downloaded from http://www.bepress.com/jhsem/vol5/iss1/33, November 10, 2008.
11.
FitzpatrickColleen, and MiletiDennis S.. 1991. “Motivating Public Evacuation.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters9: 137–152. Available at www.ijmed.org.
12.
HaydenM., DrobotS.D., RadilS., BenightC., GruntfestE.C.. 2007: Information Sources for Flash Flood and Tornado Warnings in Denver, CO and Austin, TX.” Environmental Hazards7: 211–219
13.
HeathSebastian E., BeckAlan M., KassPhilip H, and GlickmanLarry T.. 2001a. “Risk Factors for Pet Evacuation Failure after a Slow-Onset Disaster.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association218: 1905–1910.
14.
HeathSebastian E., KassPhilip H, BeckAlan M., and GlickmanLarry T.. 2001b. “Human and Pet-Related Risk Factors for Household Evacuation Failure During a Natural Disaster.” American Journal of Epidemiology153: 659–665.
15.
HeathSusan K. Voeks, and GlickmanLarry T.. 2001c. “Epidemiologic Features of Pet Evacuation Failure in a Rapid-Onset Disaster.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association218: 1898–1904.
16.
HeathSusan K. Voeks, and GlickmanLarry T.. 2000. “A Study of Pet Rescue in Two Disasters.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters18: 361–81.
17.
IrvineLeslie. 2006. Providing for Pets during Disasters, Part II: Animal Response Volunteers in Gonzales, Louisiana. Quick Response Report #187. Natural Hazards Research Applications and Information Center, Boulder, CO.
18.
IrvineLeslie. 2004. Providing for Pets during Disaster: An Exploratory Study. Quick Response Report #171. Natural Hazards Research Applications and Information Center, Boulder, CO.
19.
LazoJeffrey K, MorssRebecca E., and DemuthJulie L.. 2009. “300 Billion Served: Sources, Perceptions, Uses, and Values of Weather Forecasts.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society90: 785–98.
20.
LindellMichael K., and HwangSeong Nam. 2008. “Households’ Perceived Personal Risk and Responses in a Multihazard Environment.” Risk Analysis28: 539–556.
21.
MiletiDennis S., and DarlingtonJoanne Derouen. 1997. “The Role of Searching in Shaping Reactions to Earthquake Risk Information.” Social Problems44: 89–101.
22.
MitchemJamie D.2003. “An Analysis of the September 20, 2002 Indianapolis Tornado: Public Response to a Tornado Warning and Damage Assessment Difficulties.” Quick Response #161. Natural Hazards Research Applications and Information Center: Boulder, CO
NusbaumKenneth E., RollinBernard E., and WohlJames S.. 2007. “The Veterinary Profession's Duty of Care in Response to Disasters and Food Animal Emergencies.” Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association231: 200–202.
25.
PaulBimal Kanti, BrockVicki Tinnon, CsikiShane, and EmersonLori. 2003. “Public Response to Tornado Warnings: A Comparative Study of the May 4 2003 Tornados in Kansas, Missouri and Tennessee.” Quick Response #165. Natural Hazards Research Applications and Information Center: Boulder, CO
26.
PeacockWalter Gillis, BrodySamuel David, and HighfieldWes. 2005. “Hurricane Risk Perceptions among Florida's Single Family Homeowners.” Landscape and Urban Planning73: 120–135.
27.
RiadJasmin K., NorrisFran H., and RubackR. Barry. 1999. “Predicting Evacuation in Two Major Disasters: Risk Perception, Social Influence, and Access to Resources.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology29: 918–934.
28.
SchumacherAndrea, Sherman-MorrisKathleen, McNealKaren, and DrobotSheldon. (forthcoming). Pet Care Professionals’ Preparedness for, Response to and Utilization of Resources During Hurricane Gustav. Quick Response Report # 210. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Natural Hazards Center.
29.
Sherman-MorrisKathleen. 2005. “Tornadoes, Television and Trust—A Closer Look At The Influence of the Local Weathercaster During Severe Weather.” Environmental Hazards6: 201–210.
30.
WhiteheadJ. C.2005. “Environmental Risk and Averting Behavior: Predictive Validity of Jointly Estimated Revealed and Stated Behavior Data.” Environmental & Resource Economics32: 301–316.
31.
ZhangFuqing, MorssRebecca E., SippelJ. A., BeckmanT. K., ClementsN. C., HampshireN. L., HarveyJ. N., HernandezJ. M., MorganZ. C., MosierR. M., WangS., WinkleyS. D.. 2007. “An In-Person Survey Investigating Public Perceptions of and Responses to Hurricane Rita Forecasts along the Texas Coast.” Weather and Forecasting22: 1177–1190.
