This paper examines domestic violence reporting in a community in New Zealand struck by a snow storm. Previous theory and empirical studies are discussed to provide context for the study being presented. The results are based on in-depth interviews with representatives of agencies involved in domestic violence response and emergency management as well as statistics and case file summaries from the predominant non-statutory domestic violence agency in the community. Interviewees were asked about domestic violence reporting and their awareness of any changes during the disaster. Changes were then measured against the statistics made available. Policy and planning in place at the time of the snow storm were examined to determine if agencies were prepared for any changes in domestic violence reporting in the aftermath of the snow storm. Issues that arose from a lack of planning or policy are discussed, and suggestions are made for improving both emergency management planning, but also the planning and policies of domestic violence agencies that must continue to provide services during disasters.
AlexanderD. (1997) “The Study of Natural Disasters, 1977–1997: Some Reflections on a Changing Field of Knowledge,” Disasters21(4): 284–304.
2.
AllenN. E., BybeeD. I., and SullivanC. M. (2004) “Battered Women's Multitude of Needs: Evidence Supporting the Need for Comprehensive Advocacy,” Violence against Women10(9): 1015–1035.
3.
Amarasiri de SilvaM. W. (2008) “Ethnicity, Politics and Inequality: Post-Tsunami Humanitarian Aid Delivery in Ampara District, Sri Lanka,” Disasters33: 253–273.
4.
BarnettO. W., MartinezT. E., and KeysonM. (1996) “The Relationship Between Violence, Social Support, and Self-Blame in Battered Women,” Journal of Interpersonal Violence11(2): 221–233.
5.
BartlettE. (2006) Family Court Report 2004, Wellington: Ministry of Justice.
6.
Ben-AriA., WinstokZ., and EisikovitsZ. (2003) “Choice Within Entrapment and Entrapment Within Choice: The Challenge Facing Battered Women Who Stay,” Families in Society84(4): 539–546.
7.
BerkR. A., and NewtonP. J. (1985) “Does Arrest Really Deter Wife Battery? An Effort to Replicate the Findings of the Minneapolis Spouse Abuse Experiment,” American Sociological Review50: 253–262.
8.
BerkR. A., and NewtonP. J., and BerkS. F. (1986) “What a Difference a Day Makes: An Empirical Study of the Impact of Shelters for Battered Women,” Journal of Marriage and the Family48: 481–490.
9.
BlaikieP. T., CannonT., DavisI., and WisnerB. (1994) At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters, London: Routledge.
10.
BogatG. A., LevendoskyA. A., and von EyeA. (2005) “The Future of Research on Intimate Partner Violence: Person-Oriented and Variable-Oriented Perspectives,” American Journal of Community Psychology36(1/2): 49–70.
11.
BoumaG. D. (2000) The Research Process, (4th ed) Melbourne and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
BrownB. (2009) Organizational Response and Recovery of Domestic Violence Shelters in the Aftermath of Disaster, Doctor of Philosophy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
13.
BrownridgeD. A., and HalliS. S. (1999) “Measuring Family Violence: The Conceptualization and Utilization of Prevalence and Incidence Rates,” Journal of Family Violence14(4): 333–350.
14.
DanielsR. J., KettlD. E., and KunreutherH. (2006) On Risk and Disaster: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
15.
DavisK. M., and EnderM. G. (1999) “The 1997 Red River Valley Flood: Impact on Marital Relationships,” Applied Behavioral Science Review7(2): 181–188.
16.
DavisL. V., HagenJ. L., and EarlyT. J. (1994) “Social Services For Battered Women: Are They Adequate, Accessible, and Appropriate?” Social Work39(6): 695–704.
17.
DobashR. E., and DobashR. P. (1998) “Violent Men and Violent Contexts,” Pp 141–168 in Rethinking violence against women. Edited by DobashR. E., DobashR. P., Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
18.
DobsonN. (1994) “From Under the Mud-pack: Women and the Charleville Floods,” Australian Journal of Emergency Management9: 11–13.
19.
EnarsonE. (1999) “Violence against Women in Disasters: A Study of Domestic Violence Programs in the United States and Canada,” Violence against Women5(7): 742–768.
20.
EnarsonE., and MorrowB. H. (1997) “A Gendered Perspective: The Voices of Women,” Pp 116–140 in Hurricane Andrew: Race, Gender and the Sociology of Disaster. Edited by PeacockW. G., MorrowB. H., GladwinH., London: Routledge.
21.
FanslowJ., and RobinsonE. (2004) “Violence against Women in New Zealand: Prevalence and Health Consequences,” The New Zealand Medical Journal117: 1–12.
22.
FergussonD. M., HorwoodL. J., and RidderE. M. (2005) “Partner Violence and Mental Health Outcomes in a New Zealand Birth Cohort,” Journal of Marriage and Family67: 1103–1119
23.
FisherS. (2005) Gender-Based Violence in Sri Lanka in the Aftermath of the 2004 Tsunami Crisis: The Role of International Organisations and International NGOs in Prevention and Response to Gender-Based Violence, Master of Arts in International Studies, University of Leeds.
24.
FordhamM. H. (1998) “Making Women Visible in Disasters: Problematising the Private Domain,” Disasters22(2): 126–143.
25.
FothergillA. (1999) “An Exploratory Study of Woman Battering in the Grand Forks Flood Disaster: Implications for Community Responses and Policies,” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters17(1): 79–98.
26.
GellesR. J. (1974) The Violent Home: A Study of Physical Aggression Between Husbands and Wives, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
27.
GellesR. J. (1976) “Abused Wives: Why do They Stay?” Journal of Marriage and the Family38(4): 659–668.
28.
GellesR. J. (1985) “Family Violence,” Annual Review of Sociology11: 347–367.
29.
HagueG., and WilsonC. (2000) “The Silenced Pain: Domestic Violence 1945–1970,” Journal of Gender Studies9(2): 157–169.
30.
HegartyK., and RobertsG. (2008) “How Common is Domestic Violence against Women? The Definition of Partner Abuse in Prevalence Studies,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health22(1): 49–54.
31.
HegartyK., SheehanM., and SchonfeldC. (1999) “A Multidimensional Definition of Partner Abuse: Development and Preliminary Validation of the Composite Abuse Scale,” Journal of Family Violence14(4): 399–415.
32.
HendrikxJ. (2006) “Preliminary Analysis of the 12 June 2006 Canterbury Snow Storm,” NIWA Client Report, 2006–088, 18p.
33.
HolimanM., and SchilitR. (1991) “Aftercare for Battered Women: How to Encourage the Maintenance of Change,” Psychotherapy28(2): 345–353.
34.
HoneycombeB. (1994) “Special Needs of Women in Emergency Situations,” Australian Journal of Emergency Management8(4): 28–31.
35.
HoughtonR. M. E. (2010) ““We Had to Cope with What We Gad”: Agency Perspectives on Domestic Violence and Disasters in New Zealand, Doctor of Philosophy, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington.
JenkinsP., and PhillipsB. (2008) “Battered Women, Catastrophe, and the Context of Safety after Hurricane Katrina,” NWSA Journal20(3): 49–68.
38.
JewkesR., LevinJ., and Penn-KekanaL. (2002) “Risk Factors for Domestic Violence: Findings from a South African Cross-Sectional Study,” Social Science and Medicine55: 1603–1617.
39.
JohnsonM. P. (1995) “Patriarchal Terrorism and Common Couple Violence: Two Forms of Violence against Women,” Journal of Marriage and the Family57: 283–294.
40.
KirbyR. K. (2008) “Phenomenology and the Problems of Oral History,” The Oral History Review35(1): 22–38.
41.
LevendoskyA. A., BogatG. A., TheranS. A., TrotterJ. S., von EyeA., DavidsonW. S.II (2004) “The Social Networks of Women Experiencing Domestic Violence,” American Journal of Community Psychology34(1/2): 95–109.
42.
LoganT. K., WalkerR., ColeJ., RatliffS., and LeukefeldC. (2003) “Qualitative Differences among Rural and Urban Intimate Violence Victimization Experiences and Consequences: A Pilot Study,” Journal of Family Violence18(2): 83–92.
43.
McDermottM. J., and GarofaloJ. (2004) “When Advocacy for Domestic Violence Victims Backfires,” Violence against Women10(11): 1245–1266.
44.
MichalskiJ. H. (2004) “Making Sociological Sense Out of Trends in Intimate Partner Violence,” Violence against Women10(6): 652–675.
45.
MiletiD. S. (1999) Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States.Washington DC: Joseph Henry Press.
46.
MillsC. W. (1959) The Sociological Imagination, New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
Ministry of Social Development (2002) Te Rito Family Violence Strategy, Wellington: Ministry of Social Development.
48.
NCIWR (National Collective of Independent Women's Refuges). (2005) Annual Report 2004–2005, Wellington: National Collective of Independent Women's Refuges, 32 p.
49.
NCIWR (National Collective of Independent Women's Refuges). (2009) Annual Report 2008–2009, Wellington: National Collective of Independent Women's Refuges, 33p.
OakleyA. (1998) “Gender, Methodology and People's Ways of Knowing: Some Problems with Feminism and the Paradigm Debate in Social Science,” Sociology32(4): 707–731.
52.
PackwoodA. (2002) “Evidence-based Policy: Rhetoric and Reality,” Social Policy and Society1(3): 267–272.
53.
PalinkasL. A., DownsM. A., PettersonJ. S., and RussellJ. (1993) “Social, Cultural and Psychological Impacts of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill,” Human Organization52(1): 1–13.
54.
PerryR. W. (2007) “What is a Disaster?” Pp 1–15 in Handbook of Disaster Research. Edited by RodriguezH., QuarantelliE. L., DynesR. R., New York: Springer.
55.
QuarantelliE. L. (2001) “Statistical and Conceptual Problems in the Study of Disasters,” Disaster Prevention and Management10(5): 325–338.
56.
RashidS. F. (2000) “The Urban Poor in Dhaka City: Their Struggles and Coping Strategies during the Floods of 1998,” Disasters24(3): 240–253.
57.
RhatiganD. L., MooreT. M., and StreetA. E. (2005) “Reflections on Partner Violence: 20 Years of Research and Beyond,” Journal of Interpersonal Violence20(1): 82–88.
58.
RhatiganD. L., StreetA. E., and AxsomD. K. (2006) “A Critical Review of Theories to Explain Violent Relationship Termination: Implications for Research and Intervention,” Clinical Psychology Review26(3): 321–345.
59.
RodriguezH., and RussellC. N. (2006) “Understanding Disasters: Vulnerability and Resiliency,” in BlauJ., and Iyall SmithK. E. (eds) (2006) Public Sociologies Reader, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Pulishers, inc.
60.
SaundersD. G. (1988) “Wife Abuse, Husband Abuse or Mutual Combat? A Feminist Perspective on the Empirical Findings,” pp. 90–113 in Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse. Edited by YlloK., BogradM., Thousand Oaks, London and Delhi: Sage Publications.
61.
SmithW. (2007) “The Resilience and Response of Farm Households in the Aftermath of the 2006 Canterbury Snow Storm,” Contract Report for The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Auckland: University of Auckland, June 2007.
62.
StallingsR. A. (2005) “Disaster, Crisis, Collective Stress and Mass Deprivation,” Pp 237–274 in What is a Disaster: New Answers to Old Questions. Edited by PerryR. W., QuarantelliE. L., Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris.
63.
StetsJ. E. (1991) “Cohabiting and Marital Aggression: The Role of Social Isolation,” Journal of Marriage and the Family53(3): 669–680.
64.
StrausM. A. (1980) “Victims and Aggressors in Marital Violence,” American Behavioral Scientist23: 681–704.
65.
SullivanC. M. (1991) “The Provision of Advocacy Services to Women Leaving Abusive Partners: An Exploratory Study,” Journal of Interpersonal Violence6(1): 41–54.
66.
SullivanC. M., and BybeeD. I. (1999) “Reducing Violence using Community-based Advocacy for Women with Abusive Partners,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology67(1): 43–53.
67.
TaylorD. (2005) “Governing through Evidence: Participation and Power in Policy Evaluation,” Journal of Social Policy34(4): 601–618.
68.
ThomsonA. (1998) “Fifty Years on: An International Perspective on Oral History,” Journal of American History85(2): 581–595.
69.
TierneyK. (2006) “Social Inequality, Hazards and Disasters,” Pp 109–128 in On risk and disaster: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Edited by DanielsR. J., KettlD. E., KunreutherH., Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
70.
VivianD., and Langhinrichsen-RohlingJ. (1996) “Are Bi-directionally Violent Couples Mutually Victimised? A Gender-sensitive Comparison,” Pp. 23–52 in Domestic Partner Abuse. Edited by HambergerL. K., RenzettiC., New York: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.
71.
WilsonJ., PhillipsB. D., and NealD. M. (1998) “Domestic Violence after Disaster,” Pp 115–122 in The Gendered Terrain of Disaster. Edited by EnarsonE., MorrowB. H., Florida: International Hurricane Center.
72.
WilsonT. M., JohnstonD. M., PatonD., and HoughtonR. M. E. (2008) “Impacts and Emergency Response to the 12 June 2006 South Island Snowstorm: Tabulated Results of a Survey of Responding Organisations in the Canterbury Region,” GNS Science Report 2008/, 49 p.
73.
WisnerB., BlaikieP., CannonT., and DavisI. (2004) At Risk: Natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters.2nd edition.London and New York: Routledge.
74.
YlloK. (1988) “Political and Methodological Debates in Wife Abuse Research,” Pp. 28–50 in Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Edited by YlloK., BogradM., Thousand Oaks, London and Delhi: Sage Publications.
