Extreme events such as large-scale natural disasters create the need for cooperation within and among responding organizations. Activities to mitigate the effects of these events can be expected to range from planned to improvised. This paper presents a methodology for describing both the context and substance of improvisation during the response phase. The context is described by (i) analyzing communication patterns among personnel in and among responding organizations and (ii) determining the appropriateness of existing plans to the event. The substance of improvisation within this context is described by modeling the behavior and cognition of response personnel. Application of the methodology leads to descriptions of improvisation and its context that may be stored in machine-readable format for use either by researchers, responding organizations or designers of computer-based tools to support improvised decision making. Data collection strategies for implementing the methodology are discussed and selected steps illustrated using a data set from a large-scale natural disaster.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BanksD., and CarleyK.. 1994. “Metric Inference for Social Networks.” Journal of Classification11: 121–149.
2.
BelardoS., PazerH. L., and DankoW. D., and WallaceW. A.. 1983. “Simulation of a Crisis Management Information Network: A Serendipitous Evaluation.” Decision Sciences14: 588–606.
3.
BigleyG. A., and RobertsK. H.. 2001. “The Incident Command System: High-Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task Environments.” Academy of Management Journal44: 1281–1299.
4.
BorgattiS. P., EverettM. G., and FreemanL. C.. 1999. “UCINET 5 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis.” Natick: Analytic Technologies.
5.
BosworthS. L., and KrepsG. A.. 1986. “Structure as Process: Organization and Role.” American Sociological Review51: 699–716.
6.
CarleyK.1990. “Content Analysis.” in Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, edited by AsherR. E., and SimpsonJ. M. Y.. Edinburgh: Pergamon Press.
7.
CarleyK.1997. “Extracting Team Mental Models through Textual Analysis.” Journal of Organizational Behavior18: 533–558.
8.
CarleyK., and PalmquistM.. 1992. “Extracting, Representing, and Analyzing Mental Models.” Social Forces70: 601–636.
9.
CarrollJ. S., and JohnsonE. J.. 1990. Decision Research: A Field Guide, vol. 22, Edited by BickmanL., and RogD. J.. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
10.
CarverN., and LesserV.. 1994. “Evolution of Blackboard Control Architectures.” Expert Systems with Applications7: 1–30.
11.
CookeN. J.1994. “Varieties of Knowledge Elicitation Techniques.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies41: 801–849.
12.
DengP.-S.1996. “Using Case-based Reasoning Approach to the Support of Ill-structured Decisions.” European Journal of Operations Research93: 511–521.
13.
DrabekT. E.1970. “Methodology of Studying Disasters: Past Patterns and Future Possibilities.” American Behavioral Scientist13: 331–343.
14.
DrabekT. E.2002a. “Following Some Dreams: Recognizing Opportunities, Posing Interesting Questions, and Implementing Alternative Methods.” Pp. 127–156 in Methods of Disaster Research, edited by StallingsR. A.. Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris Corporation.
15.
DrabekT. E.2002b. “Responding to High Water: Social Maps of Two Disaster-Induced Emergent Multiorganizational Networks.” In Western Social Science Association.Albuquerque, NM.
16.
DrabekT. E., and HaasJ. E.. 1969. “Laboratory Simulation of Organizational Stress.” American Sociological Review34: 223–238.
17.
DuttaS., WiergengaB., and DaleboutA.. 1997. “Case-based Reasoning Systems: From Automation to Decision-aiding and Simulation.” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering9: 911–922.
18.
DynesR. R., and QuarantelliE. L.. 1977. “Organizational Communications and Decision Making in Crises.” Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Columbus, OH.
19.
EricssonK. A., and SimonH. A.. 1993. Protocol Analysis.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
20.
FreemanL. C.1978/79. “Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks1: 215–239.
21.
GillespieD. F., and ColignonR. A.. 1993. “Structural Change in Disaster Preparedness Networks.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters11: 143–162.
22.
Hayes-RothB.1990. “Architectural Foundations for Real-Time Performance in Intelligent Agents.” The Journal of Real-Time Systems2: 99–125.
23.
Hayes-RothB.1995. “An Architecture for Adaptive Intelligent Agents.” Artificial Intelligence72: 329–365.
24.
Hayes-RothB., BrownstonL., and van GentR.. 1995. “Multiagent Collaboration in Directed Improvisation.” In First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, edited by LessorV. R.. San Francisco, CA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press.
25.
Hayes-RothB., PflegerK., and LalandaP., and MorignotP., and BalabanovicM.. 1994. “ADomain-specific Software Architecture for Adaptive Intelligent Systems.” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering21: 288–301.
26.
Hayes-Roth, B. “An Architecture for Adaptive Intelligent Agents,” Artificial Intelligence (72), 1995. pp. 329–365.
27.
HoffmanR., ShadboltN., and BurtonA., and KleinG.. 1995. “Eliciting Knowledge from Experts: A Methodological Analysis.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes62: 129–158.
28.
HoffmanR. R., CrandallB., and ShadboltN.. 1998. “Use of the Critical Decision Method to Elicit Expert Knowledge: A Case Study in the Methodology of Cognitive Task Analysis.” Human Factors40: 254–276.
29.
JagannathanV., DodhiawalaR., and BaumL. S.. 1989. Blackboard Architectures and Applications.New York: Academic Press, Inc.
30.
Johnson-LairdP. N.1983. Mental Models.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
KillianL. M.2002. “An Introduction to Methodological Problems of Field Studies in Disasters.” Pp. 49–93 in Methods of Disaster Research, edited by StallingsR. A.. Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris Corporation.
32.
KleinG. A.1993. “Twenty Questions-Suggestions for Research in Naturalistic Decision Making.” Pp. 389–403 in Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, edited by KleinG. A., and OrasanuJ., and CalderwoodR., and ZsambokC. E.. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
33.
KrepsG. A.1991. “Organizing for Emergency Management.” Pp. 30–54 in Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Governments, edited by DrabekT. E., and HoetmerG. J.. Washington, D.C.: International City Management Association.
34.
KrepsG. A., and BosworthS. L.. 1993. “Disaster, Organizing and Role Enactment: AStructural Approach.” American Journal of Sociology99: 428–463.
35.
LiouY. I.1990. “Knowledge Acquisition: Issues, Techniques, and Methodology.” Pp. 212–236 in ACM SIGBDP conference on Trends and Directions in Expert Systems.Orlando, Florida.
36.
MendonçaD., and WallaceW. A.. 2002. “Development of a Decision Logic to Support Group Improvisation: An Application to Emergency Response.” In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-35).Big Island, HI, pp. 220b–221.
37.
MertonR. K.1957. Social Theory and Social Structure.Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
38.
MoormanC., and MinerA. S.. 1998. “Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory.” Academy of Management Review23: 698–723.
39.
MuldoonJ. E., BosworthS. L., and KrepsG. A.. 1998. “The Relational Dimension of Role Enactment in Disaster Research.” In World Congress of Sociology.Montreal, Canada.
40.
NiiH. P.1989. “Blackboard Systems.” Pp. 1–82 in The Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, edited by BarrA., and CohenP. R., and FeigenbaumE. A.. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
41.
Office of Emergency Preparedness.1969. “Hurricane Camille: A Month of Federal Action.” U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C
42.
PflegerK., and Hayes-RothB.. 1997. “An Introduction to Blackboard-style Systems Organization.” Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford.
43.
QuarantelliE. L.1978. Uses and Problems of Local EOCs in Disasters.Newark, DE: Disaster Research Center.
44.
QuarantelliE. L.1987. “Disaster Studies: An Analysis of the Social Historical Factors Affecting the Development of Research in the Area.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters5: 285–310.
45.
QuarantelliE. L.1997. “The Disaster Research Center Field Studies of Organizational Behavior in the Crisis Time Period of Disasters.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters15: 47–69.
46.
ScanlonJ.1994. “The Role of EOCs in Emergency Management: A Comparison of American and Canadian Experience.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters12: 51–75.
47.
StallingsR. A.2002. “Methods of Disaster Research: Unique or Not?” Pp. 21–44 in Methods of Disaster Research, edited by StallingsR. A.. Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris Corporation.
48.
TurnerB. A.1995. “The Role of Flexibility and Improvisation in Emergency Response.” Pp. 463–475 in Natural Risk and Civil Protection, edited by Horlick-JonesT., and AmendolaA., and CasaleR.. London: E.&F. Spon.
49.
van EppsA.2001. “Categorizing Disaster Response: Eight Stories From Hurricane Camille.” Master's Thesis, Decision Sciences and Engineering Systems, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
50.
WassermanS., and FaustK.. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Application.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
WatsonI., and MarirF.. 1994. “Case-based Reasoning: A Review.” The Knowledge Engineering Review9: 327–354.
52.
WebbG. R., BeverlyM., and McMichaelM., and NoonJ., and PattersonT.. 1998. “Role Improvising Under Conditions of Uncertainty: A Classification of Types.” University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
53.
WeickK. E.1993. “The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster.” Administrative Science Quarterly: 628–652.
54.
WeickK. E.1997. “Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis.” Organization Science9: 543–555.
55.
WengerD.1989. “Appendix to Part One: The Role of Archives for Comparative Studies of Social Structure and Disaster.” In Social Structure and Disaster, edited by KrepsG.. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press, pp. 238–250.
56.
WongA.1999. “Social Network Analysis Of Emergency Responses In Hurricane Camille.” Master's Thesis, Decision Sciences and Engineering Systems, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
57.
WoodsD. D.1993. “Process-tracing Methods for the Study of Cognition Outside of the Experimental Psychology Laboratory.” Pp. 228–251 in Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, edited by KleinG. A., and OrasnuJ., and CalderwoodR., and ZsambokC. E.. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
58.
YinR. K.1993. Applications of Case Study Research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
59.
YinR. K.1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
