In this paper I show that one can teach Introduction to Disaster Management effectively using either traditional or web-based instruction. To create the foundation for comparison, I discuss course structure, learning objectives, Bloom's taxonomy and teaching techniques. My analysis focuses upon issues of course development, the learning process, the degree of material presented and the amount of labour and time expended by the faculty member. Two key points emerge from this analysis. First, the instructor must realize that although the end results should and can be similar for both teaching methods, the paths taken to achieve those results are much different. Second, even after a class is developed and established, web-based distance learning is much more labour-intensive than traditional classroom methods.
DrabekThomas E.1991. “The Evolution of Emergency Management,” In Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government (Drabek and Hoetmer, eds.), pp. 3–29. Washington, D.C.: International City Management Association.
4.
DrabekThomas E., and HoetmerGerard J., Editors 1991. Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government.Washington, D.C.: International City Management Association.
5.
DravesWilliam A.2000. Teaching Online.River Falls, Wisconsin: LERN Books.
6.
FischerHenryIII2003. Distance Learning via the Internet: The Tale of Two Programs,” Contemporary Disaster Review1(2): pp. 46–51.
HansellWilliam H1991. “Forward,” In Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government (Drabek and Hoetmer, eds.), pp. xiii–xiv. Washington, D.C.: International City Management Association.
9.
KanterRosabeth Moss2001. e*Volve!: Succeeding in the Digital Culture of Tomorrow.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
10.
KeeganDesmond2000. Distance Training: Taking Stock at a Time of Change.London: Routledge.
11.
LeforPatricia J., and BenkeMeg, and TingEvelyn2001. “Empire State College: The Development of Online Learning,” International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning1(January 2), www.irrod/org/content/v1.2/esc.html.
MiletiDennis1999. Disaster by Design: A reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States.Washington, DC: John Henry Press.
14.
National Governors’ Association1979. Comprehensive Emergency Management: A Governor's Guide.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15.
NealDavid M.1997. “Reconsidering the Phases of Disaster,” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters15(2), pp. 239–264.
16.
NealDavid M.2000. “Developing Degree Programs in Disaster Management: Some Reflections and Observations,” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters18(3), pp. 417–437.
17.
OlsonTatana M, and WisherRobert A.2002. “The Effectiveness of Web-Based Instruction: An Initial Inquiry,” International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning Education3(October 2), www.irrod/org/content/v3.2/olsen.html.
18.
PachnowskiLynne M., and JurcaukJoseph P.2003. “Perceptions of Faculty on the Effect of Distance Learning Technology on Faculty Preparation Time,” Online Journal of Distance Learning AdministrationVI (III Fall), www.westga/∼distance/ojdla/-fall63/pachnowski64.html.
19.
PalloffRena M., and PrattKeith1999. Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace.San Francisco: Jessey-Bosse.
20.
PaulsenMorten, and RekkedalTorstein. 2001. “The NKI Internet College: A Review of 15 Years Delivery of 10,000 Online Courses,” International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning.1(2): www.irrod/org/content/v1.2/esc.html.
21.
ReevesT. C.2002. “Distance Education and the Professorate: The Issue of Productivity,” Distance Education and Distributed Learning (XX, eds.), pp. 135–156. Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.
22.
SharmaR.2001. “Online Delivery of Programmes: A Case Study of IGNOU,” International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning.1(2): www.irrod/org/content/v1.2/esc.html.
