Catastrophe in Reel Life versus Real Life: Perpetuating Disaster Myth through Hollywood Films *

Abstract

Hollywood productions continuously feature disasters and the human struggle against them. Recent entries from the disaster movie genre include films on tornadoes, volcanoes, and asteroids. This article is an exploration of how mass media, specifically the entertainment industry, conveys messages about disasters. For this paper, we examine eleven disaster films looking for five key disaster “myths “ as identified by Jones (1993) that perpetuate common misconceptions about hazards. Specifically, we research whether the entertainment industry passes along these myths; we also provide an update for earlier work conducted by Quarantelli (1985) and conclude that the message regarding hazards provided through these films is often mixed and inconsistent. Hollywood's fascination with the disaster genre, the validity of the science portrayed, and the language used to characterize the disaster are among the topics we explore between “reel” life and “real” life.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arthur

Paul

. 1998. “Unnatural Disasters.” Film Comment 34: 72–75.

Broderick

Mick

. 1991. Nuclear Movies: A Critical Analysis and Filmography of International Feature Length Films Dealing with Experimentation, Aliens, Terrorism, Holocaust and Other Disaster Scenarios, 1914–1989. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company.

Caldicott

1991. “Foreword.” In Nuclear Movies, edited by Broderick

. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company.

Cohn

Victor

. 1990. Reporting on Risk: Getting It Right in an Age of Risk. Washington, DC: The Media Institute.

Fischer III , Henry

1998. Response to Disaster Fact Versus Fiction & Its Perpetuation: The Sociology of Disaster. Second Edition. New York: University Press of America.

Gregory

1991. “Risk Perceptions as Substance and Symbol,” In Risky Business: Communicating Issues of Science, Risk, and Public Policy, edited by Wilkins

Lee

, and Patterson

Philip

. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Internet Movie Database. 1999. http://us.imdb.com/

Jones

David

. 1993. “Environmental Hazards in the 1990s: Problems, Paradigms, and Prospects.” Geography 161–165.

Krimsky

Sheldon

, and Plough

Alonzo

. 1988. Environmental Hazards: Communicating Risks as a Social Process. Dover, MA: Auburn House Publishing Company.

10.

The Movie Times. 2000. http://www.the-movie-times.com/

11.

Nelkin

Dorothy

. 1995. Selling Science: How the Press Co vers Science and Technology. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

12.

Perrine

Toni

. 1991. Beyond Apocalypse: Recent Representations of Nuclear War and Its Aftermath in U.S. Narrative Film. Evanston, IL: unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Radio, Television, and Film, Northwestern University.

13.

Perrow

Charles

. 1984. Normal Accidents: living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books.

14.

Quarantelli

E. L.

1985. “Realities and Mythologies in Disaster Films.” Communications: The European Journal of Communication 11: 31–44.

15.

Quarantelli

E. L.

(ed.). 1998. What is a Disaster?: Perspectives on the Question. London and New York: Routledge.

16.

Sontag

Susan

. 1965. “The Imagination of Disaster.” Reprinted 1986 in Against Interpretation and Other Essays. New York: Octagon Books.

17.

Wenger

Dennis E.

, Dykes

James D.

, Sebok

Thomas D.

, and Neff

Joan L.

. 1975. “It's a Matter of Myths: An Empirical Examination of Individual Insight into Disaster Response.” Mass Emergencies 1: 33–46.

18.

Yacowar

Maurice

. 1995. “The Bug in the Rug: Notes on the Disaster Genre.” Pp. 261–279 in Film Genre Reader II, edited by Grant

B. K.

. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.