BeckUlrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BlaikiePiers, CannonTerry, DavisIan, and WisnerB.. 1994. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters.London: Routledge.
3.
BolinRobert C., with StanfordLois. 1998. The Northridge Earthquake: Vulnerability and Disaster.London: Routledge.
4.
ClarkeLec. 1999. Mission Improbable: Using Fantasy Documents to Tame Disaster.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
DombrowskiWolf R.1998. “Again and Again: Is a Disaster What We Call a ‘Disaster'?” Pp. 19–30 in What is a Disaster? Perspectives on the Question, ed. QuarantelliE.L.. London: Routledge.
6.
DrabekThomas E.1986. Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings.New York: Springer-Verlag.
7.
EyreAnne1999. “In Remembrance: Post-Disaster Rituals and Symbols.” Australian Journal of Emergency Management14: 23–29
8.
FritzCharles. 1952. “The Social Psychology of Disaster: Some Theoretical Notes and Suggested Problems for Research;’ Unpublished paper.
9.
GiacaloneRobert A., and RosenfeldPaul (ed.). 1989. Impression Management in the Organization.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
GramsciAntonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Edited and translated by Quint in Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
11.
HabermasJürgen. 1994. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger with the assistance of Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
12.
HagenCarol A., EnderMorten G., TiemannKathleen A., and HagenClifford 0.Jr.1999. “Graffiti on the Great Plains: A Social Reaction to the Red River Valley Flood of 1997.” Applied Behavioral Science Review7(2): 145–158.
13.
HorkheimerMax, and AdornoTheodor W.. 1996. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Translated by John Cumming. New York: Continuum.
14.
JohnstonHank, and KlandermansBert (eds.). 1995. Social Movements and Culture.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
KrepsGary A.1981. “The Worth of the NAS-NRC (1952–1963) and DRC (1963 to present) Studies of Individual and Social Responses to Disasters.” Pp. 91–122 in Social Science and Natural Hazards, edited by WrightJames D., and RossiPeterCambridge, MA: Abt Books.
16.
LarañaEnrique, JohnstonHank, and GusfieldJoseph R.. 1994. New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
17.
MarxGary T.1986. Guest Editor. “Comparative Perspectives and Research on Collective Behavior and Social Movements.'” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters (Special Issue) 4: 3–298.
18.
McAdamDoug, McCarthyJohn D., and ZaldMayer N. (eds). 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings.Cambridge University Press.
19.
McGuiganJim. 1992. Cultural Populism.London: Rout ledge.
20.
MillsC. Wright. 1959. “The Cultural Apparatus.” Pp. 405–422 in C Wright Mills: Power, Politics, and People, edited by HorowitzIrving Louis. New York: Ballantine Books.
21.
MoranC. C.1990. “Does the Use of Humor as a Coping Strategy Affect Stresses Associated with Emergency Work?” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters8: 361–377.
22.
MorganGareth, FrostPeter J., and PondyLous R.. “Organizational Symbolism.” Pp. 3–35 in Organizational Symbolism, edited by PondyLouis R., FrostPeter J., MorganGareth, and DandridgeThomas C.. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
23.
MukerjiChandra, and SchudsonMichael. 1991. Rethinking Popular Culture.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24.
NiggJoanne M.1994. “Influence of Symbolic Interaction on Disaster Research.” Pp. 33–50 in Collective Behavior and Society: Essays Honoring the Contributions of Ralph H. Turner, edited by PlattGerald, and GordonChadGreenwich, CT: JAI Press.
25.
QuarantelliE. L.1985. “Realities and Mythologies in Disaster Films.” Communications11: 31–44.
26.
QuarantelliE. L.1987. “Disaster Studies: An Analysis of the Social Historical Factors Affecting the Development of Research in the Area” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters5: 285–310.
27.
QuarantelliE. L.1994. “Disaster Studies: The Consequences of the Historical Use of a Sociological Approach in the Development of Rcsearch.” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters12: 25–49.
28.
StallingsRobert A.1995. Promoting Risk: Constructing the Earthquake Threat.New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
29.
StoreyJohn. 1998. An Introduction to Cultural Theory and Popular Culture.Second Edition. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.
30.
TarrowSidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Polities.Second Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
TierneyKathleen J., LindellMichael K., and PerryRonald W.. Forthcoming. Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States.Washington, DC: The Joseph Henry Press.
32.
WachtendorfTricia. 1999. “Practical Lessons from the Popular Culture of Disaster.” Newark, DE: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
33.
WebbGary R.1998. “The Popular Culture of Disaster: What Is It and Why Is It Important?” Newark, DE: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
34.
WengerDennis E.1987. “Collective Behavior and Disaster Research.” Pp. 213–238 in Sociology of Disasters: Contributions of Sociology to Disaster Research, edited by DynesRussell R., MarchiBruna De, and PelandaCarloMilano, Italy: Franco Angeli.
35.
WengerDennis E., with JamesThomas, and FaupelCharles. 1980. “A Few Empirical Observations Concerning the Relationship Between the Mass Media and Disaster Knowledge: A Research Report.” Pp. 241–253 in Disasters and the Mass Media.Washington, DC: Committee on Disasters and the Mass Media, National Academy of Sciences.
36.
WengerDennis E., and WellerJack M.. 1973. “Disaster Subcultures: The Cultural Residues of Community Disasters.” Newark, DE: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.