Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article addresses the stability and performance of dis cretized adaptive control algorithms for robotic manipulator control and the compensation of these algorithms for improved stability and tracking performance. The discretization of Slotine and Li's direct adaptive control algorithm results in a sampled- data system for which stability has not been guaranteed. By formulating the entire sampled-data system in continuous time, Lyapunov's direct method is used to determine the sta bility and to derive a nonlinear discrete-time compensating term. This compensator is added to a multirate discretization of Slotine and Li's (1987a) adaptive algorithm, to stabilize the sampled-data system. For sufficiently high gain, globally stable performance and a known bound on the norm of the fil tered error is proven. The stabilizing effect of the compensator and validity of the error bound predictions are demonstrated through simulation and implementation of 2-DOF manipulatior control.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atkeson, C.G. , An, C.H. , and Hollerbach, J.M. 1986. Estimation of inertial parameters of manipulator loads and links. Proc. 3rd International Symposium on Robotics Research

Craig, J.J. , Hsu, P. , and Sastry, S.S. 1987. Adaptive control of mechanical manipulators. Int. J. Robot. Res. 6(2): 16-28.

Goodwin, G.C. , and Sin, K.S. 1984. Adaptive Filtering, Prediction and Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Middleton, R.H. 1990. Adaptive control for robot manipulators using discrete time identification. IEEE Trans. Auto. Control AC-35(5):633-637.

Morando, A. , Horowitz, R. , and Sadegh, N. 1989. Digital implementation of adaptive control algorithms for robot manipulators. Proc. IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp.1656-1662.

Narendra, K.S. , and Annaswamy, A.M. 1989. Stable Adaptive Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Niemeyer, G. , and Slotine, J.-J.E. 1991. Performance in adaptive manipulator control. Int. J. Robot. Res. 10(2):149-161.

Schwartz, H.M. , and Warshaw, G. 1989. On the richness condition for robot adaptive control. Proc. ASME Winter Annual Meeting, pp. 43-49.

Schwartz, H.M. , Warshaw, G. , and Janabi, T. 1990. Issues in robot adaptive control. Proc. American Control Conference, San Diego, CA, pp. 2797-2805.

10.

Slotine, J.-J.E. , and Li, W. 1987a. On the adaptive control of robot manipulators. Int. J. Robot. Res. 6(3):49-59.

11.

Slotine, J.-J.E. , and Li, W. 1987b. Theoretical issues in adaptive manipulator control. Proc. 5th Yale Workshop on Applications of Adaptive Systems Theory

12.

Slotine, J.-J.E. , and Li, W. 1988. Adaptive manipulator control: A case study. IEEE Trans. Auto. Control 33(11):995-1003.

13.

Spong, M.W. , Ortega, R. , and Kelly, R. 1990. Comments on "adaptive manipulator control: A case study ." IEEE Trans. Auto. Control 35(6):761-762.

14.

Warshaw, G.D. 1990. Investigations of adaptive control for a direct drive robotic manipulator. Master's thesis. Carleton University, Department of Systems and Computer Engineering.

15.

Warshaw, G.D. , and Schwartz, H.M. 1993. Compensation of sampled-data robot adaptive controllers for improved stability. Proc. 1993 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vancouver, BC, pp. 845-850.

16.

Warshaw, G.D. , Schwartz, H.M. , and Asmer, H. 1992. Stability and performance of sampled-data robot adaptive controllers. Proc. 1992 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Raleigh, NC, pp. 95-104.

Sampled-Data Robot Adaptive Control With Stabilizing Compensation

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References