Modeling of Contact Mechanics and Friction Limit Surfaces for Soft Fingers in Robotics,with Experimental Results

Abstract

A new theory in contact mechanics for modeling of soft fingers is proposed to define the relationship between the normal force and the radius of contact for soft fingers by considering general soft-finger materials, including linearly and nonlinearly elastic materials. The results show that the radius of contact is proportional to the normal force raised to the power of, which ranges from 0 to 1/3. This new theory subsumes the Hertzian contact model for linear elastic materials, where D 1/3. Experiments are conducted to validate the theory using artificial soft fingers made of various materials such as rubber and silicone. Results for human fingers are also compared. This theory provides a basis for numerically constructing friction limit surfaces. The numerical friction limit surface can be approximated by an ellipse, with the major and minor axes as the maximum friction force and the maximum moment with respect to the normal axis of contact, respectively. Combining the results of the contactmechanics model with the contact-pressure distribution, the normalized friction limit surface can be derived for anthropomorphic soft fingers. The results of the contact-mechanics model and the pressure distribution for soft fingers facilitate the construction of numerical friction limit surfaces, and will enable us to analyze and simulate contact behaviors of grasping and manipulation in robotics.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. 1972. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, 7th ed. Dover .

Cutkosky, M. R., Jordain, J. M., and Wright, P. K. 1987. Skin materials for robotic fingers. Proc. of the 1987 IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robot. and Automat. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE , pp. 1649–1654.

Fung, Y. C. 1993. Biomechanics, Medical Properties of Living Tissues, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag .

Goyal, S. 1989. Planar sliding of a rigid body with dry friction: Limit surfaces and dynamics of motion. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.

Goyal, S., Ruina, A., and Papadopoulos, J. 1989 (Scottsdale, AZ). Limit surface and moment function description of planar sliding. Proc. of the 1989 IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robot. and Automat. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE , pp. 794–799.

Goyal, S., Ruina, A., and Papadopoulos, J. 1991a. Planar sliding with dry friction: Part 1. Limit surface and moment friction . Wear 143: 307–330 .

Goyal, S., Ruina, A., and Papadopoulos, J. 1991b. Planar sliding with dry friction: Part 2. Dynamics of motion . Wear 143: 331–352 .

Han, H.-Y., Shimada, A., and Kawamura, S. 1996. Analysis of friction on human fingers and design of artificial fingers. Proc. of the 1996 IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robot. and Automat. Washington, DC: IEEE , pp. 3061–3066.

Hertz, H. 1882. On the Contact of Rigid Elastic Solids and on Hardness, chapter 6. New York: Macmillan .

10.

Howe, R. D., and Cutkosky, M. R. 1996. Practical forcemotion models for sliding manipulation . Intl. J. Robot. Res. 15(6): 557–572 .

11.

Howe, R., Kao, I., and Cutkosky, M. 1988 (Philadelphia, PA). Sliding of robot fingers under combined torsion and shear loading. Proc. of the 1988 IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robot. and Automat., vol. 1. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE , pp. 103–105.

12.

Hutchinson, J. W. 1983. Fundamentals of the phenomenological theory of nonlinear fracture mechanics . Trans. ASME, J. Appl. Mech. 50: 1042–1051 .

13.

Jameson, J. W. 1985. Analytic techniques for automated grasp. PhD dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University.

14.

Kao, I., and Cutkosky, M. R. 1992. Dextrous manipulation with compliance and sliding . Intl. J. Robot. Res. 11(1): 20–40 .

15.

Kao, I., Cutkosky, M. R., and Johansson, R. S. 1997. Robotic stiffness control and calibration as applied to human grasping tasks . IEEE Trans. Robot. and Automat. 13(4): 557–566 .

16.

Kao, I., Wu, X., and Chen, S. Forthcoming. Dual relationship in dextrous sliding manipulation under force and position control . Intl. J. Robot. Automat.

17.

Kinoshita, H., Backstrom, L., Flanagan, J. R., and Johansson, R. 1997. Tangential torque effects on the control of grip forces when holding objects with precision grip . J. Neurophys. 78(3): 1619–1630 .

18.

Mooney, M. 1949. A theory of large elastic deformation . J. Appl. Physics 11: 582–592 .

19.

Nicolson, E. J., and Fearing, R. S. 1995. The reliability of curvature estimates from linear elastic tactile sensors. Proc. of the 1995 IEEE Intl. Conf. on Robot. and Automat. Washington, DC: IEEE .

20.

Schallamach, A. 1969. The load dependence of rubber friction . Proc. Physical Soc. 65(9): 657–661 .

21.

Tatara, Y. 1989. Extensive theory of force-approach relations of elastic spheres in compression and in impact . ASME J. Eng. Materials Tech. 111: 163–168 .

22.

Tatara, Y. 1991. On compression of rubber elastic sphere over a large range of displacements. Part 1: Theoretical study . ASME J. Eng. Materials Tech. 113: 285–291 .

23.

Tatara, Y., Shima, S., and Lucero, J. C. 1991. On compression of rubber elastic sphere over a large range of displacements. Part 2: Comparison of theory and experiment . ASME J. Eng. Materials Tech. 113: 292–295 .

24.

Timoshenko, S. P., and Goodier, J. N. 1970. Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill .

25.

Wolf, Emil. 1992. Progress in Optics, vol. 30. New York: North-Holland .