In this paper a program of singularity theory is pro claimed to be of systematic use in robotics. Complete lists of normal forms are proposed and are regarded as candi date models of kinematics of robot manipulators. Argu ments for the applicability of candidate normal forms to manipulator kinematics are provided. Singularities and bifurcation diagrams of the normal forms are examined and consequences derived for the inverse kinematic prob lem in redundant kinematics with singularities.
Aubin, J.P., Ekeland, I.1984. Applied Nonlinear Analysis. New York : John Wiley.
3.
Baker, D.R., Wampler II, C.W.1988. On the inverse kinematics of redundant manipulators . Int. J. Robot. Res. 7(2):3-21.
4.
Brockett, R.W.1984. Robotic manipulators and the product of exponentials formula . In Fuhrmann, P. (ed.): Mathematic Theory of Networks and Systems. Berlin : Springer-Verlag, pp. 120-129.
5.
Chang, P.H.1987. A closed-form solution for inverse kinematics of robot manipulators with redundancy. IEEE J. Robot. Automat.3(5):393-403.
6.
Davis, J.H., Hirschorn, R.M.1988. Tracing control of a flexible robot link. IEEE Trans. Auto. Control33(3):238-248.
7.
De Luca, A., Isidori, A., Nicolo, F.1986 (Athens, Greece, December). Control of robot arm with elastic joints via nonlinear dynamic feedback. 25th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control.
8.
Descusse, J., Moog, C.1985. Decoupling with dynamic compensation for strong-invertible affine nonlinear systems. Int. J. Control42(6):1387-1398.
9.
Fliess, M.1986. A note on the invertibility of nonlinear input-output systems. Sys. Control Lett. 8(2):147-151.
10.
Galicki, M.1991. A closed solution to the inverse kinematics of redundant manipulators. Mech. Machine Theory. In press.
11.
Golubitsky, M., Guillemin, V.1973. Stable Mappings and Their SingularitiesBerlin: Springer-Verlag.
12.
Golubitsky, M., Schaeffer, D.G.1985. Singularities and Groups in Bifurcation Theory . Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
13.
Hirsch, M.W.1976. Differential Topology. Berlin : Springer-Verlag.
14.
Hirschorn, R.M., Davis, J.1987. Output tracking for nonlinear systems with singular points . SIAM J. Control Opt.25(3):547-557.
15.
Hirschorn, R.M., Davis, J.1988. Global output tracking for nonlinear systems. SIAM J. Control Opt.26(6):1321-1330.
16.
Isidori, A.1985. Nonlinear Control Systems: An IntroductionBerlin: Springer-Verlag.
17.
Kasiński, A., Tchoń, K.1988. Internal trajectory determination for manipulators with locally degenerate kinematics. Proc. 2nd Nat. Robot. Conf. Wroclaw: Technical University Publ. 2:126-134 (in Polish).
18.
Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue, F., Crouch, P.E., Ighneiwa, I.1989. Tracking through singularities. In Descusse, J., et al. (eds.): New Trends in Nonlinear Control Theory. Berlin: Springer-Verlag , pp. 44-53.
19.
Litvin, F.L., Tan, J.1989. Singularities in motion and displacement functions of constrained mechanical systems. Int. J. Robot. Res.8(2):30-43.
20.
Loncaric, J.1985. Geometrical analysis of compliant mechanisms in robotics . Ph.D. thesis, Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University .
21.
Martinet, J.1982. Singularities of Smooth Functions and Maps. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Mather, J.N.1971. Stability of Cx mappings: VI. The nice dimension . In Wall, C. T. C. (ed.): Liverpool Singularities I. Berlin: Springer-Verlag , pp. 207-253.
23.
Michor, P.1976. Classification of elementary catastrophes of codimension ≤6. Institutsbericht Nr 51Linz: Johannes Kepler University Institut fur Mathematik.
24.
Morin, B.1965. Formes canoniques des singularites d'une application differentiable. Comp. RendusAcad. Sci. Paris260(2):5662-5665, 6503-6506.
25.
Nakamura, Y., Hanafusa, H.1987. Optimal redundancy control of robot manipulators . Int. J. Robot. Res. 6(1):32-42.
26.
Nijmeijer, H., Respondek, W.1988. Dynamic input-output decoupling of nonlinear control systems . IEEE Trans. Auto. Control33(11):1065-1070.
27.
Park. C.F., Brockett, R.W.1989. Harmonic maps and the optimal design of mechanisms . Preprint. Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University .
28.
Paul, R.P.1981. Robot Manipulators: Mathematics, Programming, and Control . Cambridge. Mass.: MIT Press.
29.
Sciavicco, L., Siciliano, B.1987. Solving the inverse kinematic problem for robotic manipulators. Proc. 6th Symp. Ro. Man. Sy. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, pp. 107-114.
30.
Shamir, T., Yomdin, Y.1987. Repeatability of redundant manipulators: Mathematical solution of the problem. Preprint. Department of Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science.
31.
Sontag, E.D., Sussmann, H.1985 (Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., December). Remarks on the time-optimal control of two-link manipulators. IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control.
32.
Stewart, I.N.1982. Catastrophe theory in physics. Rep. Progr. Phys.45(2):185-221.
33.
Tarn, T.J., et al. 1984 (Las Vegas, December). Nonlinear feedback in robot arm control. 23rd IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control.
34.
Tchoń, K.1986. On Stable and Typical Properties of Control SystemsWroclaw: Technical University Publ.
35.
Tchoń, K.1990. Towards a differential topological classification of robot manipulators. Progress in Systems and Control Theory in Kaashoek, M. A. et al. (eds.): Robust Control of Linear Systems and Nonlinear Control. Boston: Birkhäuser.
36.
Tchoń. K., Urban, P.1991. Displacement singularities of n pendula. In press.
37.
Wang, S-L., Waldron, K.J.1987. A study of the singular configurations of serial manipulators. J. Mech. Trans. Automat. in Des. Trans. ASME109(1):14-20.
38.
Woodcock, A.E.R., Poston, T.1974. A Geometrical Study of the Elementary CatastrophesBerlin: Springer-Verlag.
