Experimental Evaluation of Nonlinear Feedback and Feedforward Control Schemes for Manipulators

Abstract

The manipulator trajectory tracking control problem revolves around computing the torques to be applied to achieve accu rate tracking. This problem has been extensively studied in simulations, but real-time results have been lacking in the robotics literature. In this paper, we present the experimental results of the real-time performance of model-based control algorithms. We compare the computed-torque control scheme with the feedforward dynamics compensation scheme. The feedforward scheme compensates for the manipulator dy namics in the feedforward path, whereas the computed-torque scheme uses the dynamics in the feedback loop for lineariza tion and decoupling. The parameters in the dynamics model for the computed-torque and feedforward schemes were esti mated by using an identification algorithm. Our experiments underscore the importance of including the off-diagonal terms of the manipulator inertia matrix in the torque compu tation. This observation is further supported by our analysis of the dynamics equations. The manipulator control schemes have been implemented on the CMU DD arm II with a sam pling period of 2 ms.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

An, C.H. , Atkeson, C.G. , and Hollerbach, J.M. 1986 (San Francisco, California , April). Experimental determination of the effect of feedforward control on trajectory tracking errors. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation, ed. A. K. Bejczy. IEEE, pp. 55-60.

Asada, H. , Kanade, T. , and Takeyama, I. 1982 (April). Control of a direct-drive arm. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-82-4. The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.

Bejczy, A.K. 1974 (February). Robot arm dynamics and control. Technical Memorandum 33-669. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.

Brady, M. , et al. eds. 1982. Robot motion: planning and control. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Freund, E. 1982. Fast nonlinear control with arbitrary pole placement for industrial robots and manipulators. Int. J. Robotics Res. 1(1):65-78.

Gilbert, E.G. , and Ha, I.J. 1984. An approach to nonlinear feedback control and its application to robotics. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybernet. SMC-14(6):879-884.

Horowitz, R. , and Tomizuka, M. 1980 (Chicago, Illinois, November). An adaptive control scheme for mechanical manipulators—compensation of nonlinearity and decoupling control. Proc. ASME Winter Ann. Meeting.

Kanade, T. , Khosla, P.K. , and Tanaka, N. 1984 (Las Vegas, Nevada, December). Real-time control of the CMU direct drive arm II using customized inverse dynamics. In Proc. 23rd IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, ed. M. P. Polis. pp. 1345-1352.

Khosla, P.K. 1986 (August). Real-time control and identification of direction-drive manipulators. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering , Carnegie Mellon University.

10.

Khosla, P.K. 1987 (Raleigh, North Carolina, March). Choosing sampling rates for robot control. Proc. IEEE Conf. on Robotics and Automation. IEEE.

11.

Khosla, P.K. , and Kanade, T. 1985 (Florida, December). Parameter identification of robot dynamics. In Proc. 24th CDC, ed. G. F. Franklin. pp. 1754-1760.

12.

Khosla, P.K. , and Kanade, T. 1986 (April). Real-time implementation and evaluation of model-based controls on CMU DD arm II. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, ed. A. K. Bejczy. IEEE.

13.

Leahy, M.B. , Valavanis, K.P. , and Saridis, G.N. 1986 (San Francisco, California, April). The effects of dynamics models on robot control. Proc. IEEE Conf on Robotics and Automation. IEEE.

14.

Liegeois, Fournier and Aldon. 1980 (June). Model-reference control of high velocity robots. Proc. Joint ACC. AACC.

15.

Neuman, C.P. , and Khosla, P.K. 1985. Identification of robot dynamics: an application of recursive estimation. In Advances in adaptive systems theory, ed. K. S. Narendra. New York : Plenum.

16.

Raibert, M.H. , and Horn, B.K.P. 1978. Manipulator control using configuration space method. Industrial Robot 5:69-73.

17.

Schmitz, D. , Khosla, P.K. , and Kanade, T. 1985 (Tokyo, Japan, September). Development of CMU direct-drive arm II. In Proc. 15th Int. Symp. on Industrial Robotics, ed. Yukio Hasegawa.

18.

Seraji, H. 1986 (San Francisco, Calfiornia, April). Linear multivariable control of robot manipulators. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf on Robotics andautomation. IEEE, pp. 565-571.

19.

Slotine, J-J. E. 1985. The robust control of robot manipulators. Int. J. Robotics Res. 4(2):81-100.

20.

Tourassis, V.D. 1985 (June). Dynamic modeling and control of robotic manipulators. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University.