A Comparative Study of Generalized Coordinates for Solving the Inverse- Kinematics Problem of a 6R Robot Manipulator

Abstract

This paper studies two different approaches to the inverse- kinematics problem for a six-degree-of-freedom robot manip ulator having three revolute joint axes intersecting at the wrist. One method uses three rotational generalized coordi nates to describe the orientation of the body. The other method uses equivalent Euler parameters with one constraint equation. These two approaches have been incorporated into two different computer algorithms, and the results from each are compared on the basis of computational complexity, time simulation, singularity, etc. It was found that Euler parame ters were less efficient than three rotational angles for solving the inverse-kinematics problem of the robot considered, and that the physical singularities caused by the robot mecha nism could not be eliminated by using either of the two ap proaches.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bezhko, A.P. , et al. 1971. Applications of quaternions in the theory of finite rotations of a rigid body. Mechanics of Solids 6(1):110-119.

Featherstone, R. 1983a. Calculation of robot joint rates and actuator torques from end effector velocities and applied forces. Mechanism and Machine Theory 18(3):193-198.

Featherstone, R. 1983b. Position and velocity transformations between robot end-effector coordinates and joint angles. Int. J. Robotics Res. 2(2):35-45.

Hollerbach, J.M. , and Sahar, G. 1983. Wrist-partitioned, inverse kinematic accelerations and manipulator dynamics. Int. J. Robotics Res. 2(4):61-76.

Huston, R.L. , Passerello, C.E. , and Harlow, M.W. 1978 (Dec.). Dynamics of multirigid-body systems. Trans. ASME J. Applied Mechanics 45:889-894.

Ickes, B.P. 1970 (Jan.). A new method for performing digital control system attitude computations using quaternions. AIAA J. 8(1):13-17.

Lipkin, H. , and Duffy, J. 1985. A vector analysis of robot manipulators. In Recent advances in robotics, ed. G. Beni and S. Hackwood. New York: Wiley, pp. 214-219.

Nikravesh, P.E. , and Chung, I.S. 1982 (Oct.). Application of Euler parameters to the dynamic analysis of three-dimensional constrained mechanical systems. Trans. ASME J. of Mechanical Design 104:785-791.

Paul, R.P. 1981. Robot manipulators: mathematics, programming, and control . Cambridge: MIT Press.

10.

Pieper, D.L. , and Roth, B. 1969 (Zakopane, Poland). The kinematics of manipulators under computer control. Proc. 2nd Int. Congress on the Theory of Mechanisms and Machines 2:159-169.

11.

Whittaker, E.T. 1965. A treatise on the analytical dynamics of particles and rigid bodies. London: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Wittenburg, J. 1977. Dynamics of systems of rigid bodies. Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner.

13.

Yang, A.T. , and Freudenstein, F. 1964 (June). Application of dual-number quaternion algebra to the analysis of spatial mechanisms. Trans. ASME J. Applied Mechanics 31:300-308.